First-principles Rheological Modelling and Parameter Estimation for Nanoparticle-based Smart Drilling Fluids

Abstract Drilling fluids serve many applications in the oil-drilling process, including the removing of cuttings, drill bit cooling and the prevention of fluid transfer to and from the rock strata. With the addition of nanoparticles it is possible to facilitate in-situ control of the drilling fluid rheology, increasing the hydraulic efficiency of drilling campaigns and reducing costs in a variety of reservoir environments. This paper proposes a first-principles approach to the rheology of smart drilling fluids containing Fe 3 O 4 nanoparticles which have shown advantages to increasing drilling efficiency in a variety of reservoir environments. The model for shear stress is developed based on a force balance between the Van der Waals attractions of monodispersed Fe 3 O 4 nanoparticle spheres. The model for viscosity is developed by considering the force required to maintain the nanoparticles in suspension being equal to the drag force as calculated for Stokes flow approximation about a sphere. Both models had a candidate equation for interparticle distance under increasing shear rate. A bivariate model described the rheological effects of shear rate and Fe 3 O 4 nanoparticle concentration with a high predictive potential R 2 τ γ . ϕ = 0.993 , R 2 μ γ . ϕ = 0.999 . The trivariate model accounts for temperature with high predicative potential R 2 τ γ . ϕ T = 0.983 , R 2 μ γ . ϕ T = 0.986 . Heating effects and low nanoparticle concentrations increase standard correlation error.

[1]  A. Dandekar,et al.  Petroleum Reservoir Rock and Fluid Properties , 2006 .

[2]  Roberto Maglione,et al.  Optimal determination of rheological parameters for Herschel-Bulkley drilling fluids and impact on pressure drop, velocity profiles and penetration rates during drilling , 2006 .

[3]  R. Flatt,et al.  Yodel: A Yield Stress Model for Suspensions , 2006 .

[4]  S. A. Sadough,et al.  An Enhanced Herschel–Bulkley Model for Thixotropic Flow Behavior of Semisolid Steel Alloys , 2013, Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B.

[5]  Thomas J. Dougherty,et al.  A Mechanism for Non‐Newtonian Flow in Suspensions of Rigid Spheres , 1959 .

[6]  B. Abu-Jdayil,et al.  The Modification of Rheological Properties of Sodium Bentonite-water Dispersions with Low Viscosity CMC Polymer Effect , 2014 .

[7]  R. Flatt,et al.  Yield Stress of Multimodal Powder Suspensions: An Extension of the YODEL (Yield Stress mODEL) , 2007 .

[8]  Dimitrios I. Gerogiorgis,et al.  Development and Parameter Estimation for a Multivariate Herschel-Bulkley Rheological Model of a Nanoparticle-Based Smart Drilling Fluid , 2015 .

[9]  A. James,et al.  The yield surface of viscoelastic and plastic fluids in a vane viscometer , 1997 .

[10]  J. Hermoso,et al.  High Pressure Mixing Rheology of Drilling Fluids , 2012 .

[11]  James J. Sheng,et al.  Modern Chemical Enhanced Oil Recovery: Theory and Practice , 2010 .

[12]  Q. D. Nguyen,et al.  Measuring the Flow Properties of Yield Stress Fluids , 1992 .

[13]  V. Kelessidis,et al.  Yield stress of water–bentonite dispersions , 2008 .

[14]  Neil J. Balmforth,et al.  Yielding to Stress: Recent Developments in Viscoplastic Fluid Mechanics , 2014 .

[15]  Graeme Puxty,et al.  Tutorial on the fitting of kinetics models to multivariate spectroscopic measurements with non-linear least-squares regression , 2006 .

[16]  M. Annis High-Temperature Flow Properties of Water-Base Drilling Fluids , 1967 .