Face Verification Using Synthesized Non-Frontal Models

{NOTE}: {THIS} {REPORT} {HAS} {BEEN} {SUPERSEDED} {BY} {IDIAP-RR} 04-04. {I}n this report we address the problem of non-frontal face verification when only a frontal training image is available (e.g. a passport photograph) by augmenting a client's frontal face model with artificially synthesized models for non-frontal views. In the framework of a {G}aussian {M}ixture {M}odel ({GMM}) based classifier, two techniques are proposed for the synthesis: {UBM}diff and {L}in{R}eg. {B}oth techniques rely on prior information and learn how face models for the frontal view are related to face models at a non-frontal view. {T}he synthesis and augmentation approach is evaluated by applying it to two face verification systems: {P}rincipal {C}omponent Analysis ({PCA}) based and {DCT}mod2 based; the two systems are a representation of holistic and non-holistic approaches, respectively. {R}esults from experiments on the {FERET} database suggest that in almost all cases, frontal model augmentation has beneficial effects for both systems; they also suggest that the {L}in{R}eg technique (which is based on multivariate regression of classifier parameters) is more suited to the {PCA} based system and that the {UBM}diff technique (which is based on differences between two general face models) is more suited to the {DCT}mod2 based system. The results also support the view that the standard {DCT}mod2/{GMM} system (trained on frontal faces) is less affected by out-of-plane rotations than the corresponding {PCA}/{GMM} system; moreover, the {DCT}mod2/{GMM} system using augmented models is, in almost all cases, more robust than the corresponding {PCA}/{GMM} system.

[1]  Sébastien Marcel,et al.  Comparison of MLP and GMM Classifiers for Face Verification on XM2VTS , 2003, AVBPA.

[2]  Douglas A. Reynolds,et al.  The NIST speaker recognition evaluation - Overview, methodology, systems, results, perspective , 2000, Speech Commun..

[3]  Douglas A. Reynolds,et al.  Speaker Verification Using Adapted Gaussian Mixture Models , 2000, Digit. Signal Process..

[4]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[5]  Alexander H. Waibel,et al.  Growing Gaussian mixture models for pose invariant face recognition , 2000, Proceedings 15th International Conference on Pattern Recognition. ICPR-2000.

[6]  Chin-Hui Lee,et al.  Maximum a posteriori estimation for multivariate Gaussian mixture observations of Markov chains , 1994, IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process..

[7]  Shigeo Abe DrEng Pattern Classification , 2001, Springer London.

[8]  M. Turk,et al.  Eigenfaces for Recognition , 1991, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[9]  Joachim M. Buhmann,et al.  Distortion Invariant Object Recognition in the Dynamic Link Architecture , 1993, IEEE Trans. Computers.

[10]  David G. Stork,et al.  Pattern Classification , 1973 .

[11]  Surendra Ranganath,et al.  Pose-invariant face recognition using a 3D deformable model , 2003, Pattern Recognit..

[12]  Christoph von der Malsburg,et al.  Learning Feature Transformations to Recognize Faces Rotated in Depth , 1995 .

[13]  Paul A. Griffin,et al.  Statistical Approach to Shape from Shading: Reconstruction of Three-Dimensional Face Surfaces from Single Two-Dimensional Images , 1996, Neural Computation.

[14]  Kuldip K. Paliwal,et al.  Fast features for face authentication under illumination direction changes , 2003, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[15]  Luc Vandendorpe,et al.  Face Verification Competition on the XM2VTS Database , 2003, AVBPA.

[16]  Douglas A. Reynolds,et al.  A Gaussian mixture modeling approach to text-independent speaker identification , 1992 .

[17]  David Beymer,et al.  Face recognition from one example view , 1995, Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision.

[18]  Hyeonjoon Moon,et al.  The FERET Evaluation Methodology for Face-Recognition Algorithms , 2000, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[19]  Gerhard Rigoll,et al.  Recognition of JPEG compressed face images based on statistical methods , 2000, Image Vis. Comput..

[20]  D. Huang,et al.  Some variable selection procedures in multivariate linear regression models , 1994 .

[21]  Alex Pentland,et al.  Probabilistic Visual Learning for Object Representation , 1997, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[22]  Chin-Chuan Han,et al.  Why recognition in a statistics-based face recognition system should be based on the pure face portion: a probabilistic decision-based proof , 2001, Pattern Recognit..

[23]  Alex Pentland,et al.  View-based and modular eigenspaces for face recognition , 1994, 1994 Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[24]  Tomaso Poggio,et al.  Incorporating prior information in machine learning by creating virtual examples , 1998, Proc. IEEE.

[25]  Roberto Brunelli,et al.  Face Recognition: Features Versus Templates , 1993, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[26]  Samy Bengio,et al.  Robust Features for Frontal Face Authentication in Difficult Image Conditions , 2003, AVBPA.

[27]  Philip C. Woodland,et al.  Speaker adaptation of HMMs using linear regression , 1994 .

[29]  D. Rubin,et al.  Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM - algorithm plus discussions on the paper , 1977 .

[30]  C. Sanderson,et al.  Face Processing & Frontal Face Verification , 2003 .

[31]  Stefan Fischer,et al.  Face authentication with Gabor information on deformable graphs , 1999, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[32]  Philip C. Woodland,et al.  Maximum likelihood linear regression for speaker adaptation of continuous density hidden Markov models , 1995, Comput. Speech Lang..

[33]  Sadaoki Furui,et al.  Recent advances in speaker recognition , 1997, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[34]  Ferdinando Silvestro Samaria,et al.  Face recognition using Hidden Markov Models , 1995 .