A surface on the androgen receptor that allosterically regulates coactivator binding

Current approaches to inhibit nuclear receptor (NR) activity target the hormone binding pocket but face limitations. We have proposed that inhibitors, which bind to nuclear receptor surfaces that mediate assembly of the receptor's binding partners, might overcome some of these limitations. The androgen receptor (AR) plays a central role in prostate cancer, but conventional inhibitors lose effectiveness as cancer treatments because anti-androgen resistance usually develops. We conducted functional and x-ray screens to identify compounds that bind the AR surface and block binding of coactivators for AR activation function 2 (AF-2). Four compounds that block coactivator binding in solution with IC50 ≈ 50 μM and inhibit AF-2 activity in cells were detected: three nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs and the thyroid hormone 3,3′,5-triiodothyroacetic acid. Although visualization of compounds at the AR surface reveals weak binding at AF-2, the most potent inhibitors bind preferentially to a previously unknown regulatory surface cleft termed binding function (BF)-3, which is a known target for mutations in prostate cancer and androgen insensitivity syndrome. X-ray structural analysis reveals that 3,3′,5-triiodothyroacetic acid binding to BF-3 remodels the adjacent interaction site AF-2 to weaken coactivator binding. Mutation of residues that form BF-3 inhibits AR function and AR AF-2 activity. We propose that BF-3 is a previously unrecognized allosteric regulatory site needed for AR activity in vivo and a possible pharmaceutical target.

[1]  F. Larrea,et al.  Novel molecular defects in the androgen receptor gene of Mexican patients with androgen insensitivity , 2001, Clinical genetics.

[2]  N. Chirgadze,et al.  A second binding site for hydroxytamoxifen within the coactivator-binding groove of estrogen receptor beta. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  Grazia Chiellini,et al.  Ligand selectivity by seeking hydrophobicity in thyroid hormone receptor , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  Mutations at the boundary of the hinge and ligand binding domain of the androgen receptor confer increased transactivation function. , 2001, Molecular endocrinology.

[5]  V. Jordan,et al.  Treatment of Postmenopausal Breast Cancer with Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators (SERMs). , 2005, Breast disease.

[6]  D. Chen,et al.  Identification of amino acids in the tau 2-region of the mouse glucocorticoid receptor that contribute to hormone binding and transcriptional activation. , 1997, Molecular endocrinology.

[7]  R. Fletterick,et al.  Structure-based design and synthesis of a thyroid hormone receptor (TR) antagonist. , 2002, Endocrinology.

[8]  D. McDonnell,et al.  Development of peptide antagonists for the androgen receptor using combinatorial peptide phage display. , 2005, Molecular endocrinology.

[9]  R. Flower The development of COX2 inhibitors , 2003, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[10]  R. Fletterick,et al.  A High-Throughput Screening Method to Identify Small Molecule Inhibitors of Thyroid Hormone Receptor Coactivator Binding , 2006, Science's STKE.

[11]  D. McDonnell,et al.  Androgen receptor-cofactor interactions as targets for new drug discovery. , 2005, Trends in pharmacological sciences.

[12]  J. Katzenellenbogen,et al.  Design, synthesis, and in vitro biological evaluation of small molecule inhibitors of estrogen receptor α coactivator binding , 2004 .

[13]  R. Fletterick,et al.  Discovery of Small Molecule Inhibitors of the Interaction of the Thyroid Hormone Receptor with Transcriptional Coregulators* , 2005, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[14]  B. O’Malley,et al.  The Expanding Cosmos of Nuclear Receptor Coactivators , 2006, Cell.

[15]  Bin He,et al.  Structural basis for androgen receptor interdomain and coactivator interactions suggests a transition in nuclear receptor activation function dominance. , 2004, Molecular cell.

[16]  P B Sigler,et al.  Crystallographic comparison of the estrogen and progesterone receptor's ligand binding domains. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  P. Toogood Progress toward the development of agents to modulate the cell cycle. , 2002, Current opinion in chemical biology.

[18]  Vicki L. Nienaber,et al.  Discovering novel ligands for macromolecules using X-ray crystallographic screening , 2000, Nature Biotechnology.

[19]  H. Scher,et al.  Collocation of androgen receptor gene mutations in prostate cancer. , 2001, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[20]  Michelle R. Arkin,et al.  Small-molecule inhibitors of protein–protein interactions: progressing towards the dream , 2004, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[21]  R J Fletterick,et al.  Hormone-dependent coactivator binding to a hydrophobic cleft on nuclear receptors. , 1998, Science.

[22]  C. Glass,et al.  Sensors and signals: a coactivator/corepressor/epigenetic code for integrating signal-dependent programs of transcriptional response. , 2006, Genes & development.

[23]  M. McPhaul Androgen receptor mutations and androgen insensitivity , 2002, Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology.

[24]  F. Ghadessy,et al.  Human androgen receptor mutation disrupts ternary interactions between ligand, receptor domains, and the coactivator TIF2 (transcription intermediary factor 2). , 2000, Molecular endocrinology.

[25]  T. Berg Modulation of protein-protein interactions with small organic molecules. , 2003, Angewandte Chemie.

[26]  N. Mitro,et al.  The nuclear receptor LXR is a glucose sensor , 2007, Nature.

[27]  E. Wilson,et al.  The NH(2)-terminal and carboxyl-terminal interaction in the human androgen receptor. , 2002, Molecular genetics and metabolism.

[28]  Drug discovery at signaling interfaces. , 2003, Ernst Schering Research Foundation workshop.

[29]  Liang Xia,et al.  Functional analysis of 44 mutant androgen receptors from human prostate cancer. , 2002, Cancer research.

[30]  Olivier Poch,et al.  Signature of the oligomeric behaviour of nuclear receptors at the sequence and structural level , 2004, EMBO reports.

[31]  B. Darimont Finding specificity within a conserved interaction site. , 2003, Chemistry & biology.

[32]  D. Djakiew,et al.  Dihydrotestosterone (DHT) modulates the ability of NSAIDs to induce apoptosis of prostate cancer cells , 2002, Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology.

[33]  Vincent Laudet,et al.  The nuclear receptor factsbook , 2002 .

[34]  R. Fletterick,et al.  The Molecular Mechanisms of Coactivator Utilization in Ligand-dependent Transactivation by the Androgen Receptor* , 2005, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[35]  H. Scher,et al.  Biology of progressive, castration-resistant prostate cancer: directed therapies targeting the androgen-receptor signaling axis. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[36]  D. Tindall,et al.  Molecular regulation of androgen action in prostate cancer , 2006, Journal of cellular biochemistry.

[37]  Hanne Grøn,et al.  Recognition and Accommodation at the Androgen Receptor Coactivator Binding Interface , 2004, PLoS biology.

[38]  L. Vassilev,et al.  In Vivo Activation of the p53 Pathway by Small-Molecule Antagonists of MDM2 , 2004, Science.

[39]  Kendall W Nettles,et al.  Ligand control of coregulator recruitment to nuclear receptors. , 2005, Annual review of physiology.

[40]  C. Heinlein,et al.  Androgen receptor in prostate cancer. , 2004, Endocrine reviews.