Battle Management Language Transformations

Abstract : A critically needed element of transformation is to enable interoperation of alliance and coalition Command and Control (C2) and Modelling and Simulation (M&S) systems. Battlefield Management Language (BML) is being developed as a common representation of military mission suitable for automated processing. Within NATO the task group MSG-048 Coalition BML is defining a BML using the Joint Command, Control and Consultation Information Exchange Data Model (JC3IEDM) as a lexicon. BML addresses the capability to initialize Simulations with Operational orders and taskings that has been recognized as a key future capability for both training and experimentation. We describe a limited demonstration where both French and US C2 planning systems were used to prepare a Course of Action (COA) to conduct a coalition coordinated operation which supported approval of the new Technology Assessment Program MSG-048. BML is being explored in US Army, US Joint and Coalition Contexts. With MSG-048, continued research in many dimensions is continuing to broaden the BML concept. Better integration of reasoning within a Coalition C2 process can be facilitated by specific BMLs. An example is geoBML. Such reasoning capabilities are fundamental to enabling transformation through C2-Simulation interoperation and also to providing capabilities for future experimentation. We describe how geoBML will be implemented through extensions of C2IEDM, expanding and further transforming coalition capabilities.

[1]  J. Mark Pullen,et al.  Extensible Battle Management Language as a Transformation Enabler , 2004, Simul..

[2]  Andreas Tolk,et al.  Coalition Battle Management Language , 2004 .

[3]  J. Mark Pullen,et al.  An International Experiment in Command and Control -- Simulation Interoperability Using Web Services , 2006, 2006 Tenth IEEE International Symposium on Distributed Simulation and Real-Time Applications.

[4]  Keith Devlin,et al.  Infosense: Turning Information into Knowledge , 1999 .

[5]  Curtis Blais Coalition Battle Management Language (C-BML) Study Group Report , 2005 .

[6]  Andreas Tolk,et al.  Using Web services and data mediation/storage services to enable command and control to simulation interoperability , 2005, Ninth IEEE International Symposium on Distributed Simulation and Real-Time Applications.

[7]  Bernard Schwartz,et al.  Turning information into knowledge , 1977 .

[8]  Andreas Tolk,et al.  Developing Extensible Battle Management Language to Enable Coalition Interoperability , 2004 .

[9]  Curtis Blais,et al.  Coalition Battle Management Language (C-BML) Study Group Final Report , 2005 .

[10]  Michael R. Hieb,et al.  Development of a C2 Standard of Task Representation for C4ISR Systems, Simulations and Robotics: Battle Management Language , 2002 .

[11]  Andreas Tolk,et al.  An Architecture for Web-Services Based Interest Management in Real Time Distributed Simulation , 2004, Eighth IEEE International Symposium on Distributed Simulation and Real-Time Applications.

[12]  Andreas Tolk,et al.  Integrating Air and Ground Operations Within a Common Battle Management Language , 2005 .