Mental number line disruption in a right-neglect patient after a left-hemisphere stroke

A right-neglect patient with focal left-hemisphere damage to the posterior superior parietal lobe was assessed for numerical knowledge and tested on the bisection of numerical intervals and visual lines. The semantic and verbal knowledge of numbers was preserved, whereas the performance in numerical tasks that strongly emphasize the visuo-spatial layout of numbers (e.g. number bisection) was impaired. The behavioral pattern of error in the two bisection tasks mirrored the one previously described in left-neglect patients. In other words, our patient misplaced the subjective midpoint (numerical or visual) to the left as function of the interval size. These data, paired with the patient's lesion site are strictly consistent with the tripartite organization of number-related processes in the parietal lobes as proposed by Dehaene and colleagues. According to these authors, the posterior superior parietal lobe on both hemispheres underpins the attentional orientation on the putative mental number line, the horizontal segment of the intraparietal sulcus is bilaterally related to the semantic of the numerical domain, whereas the left angular gyrus subserves the verbal knowledge of numbers. In summary, our results suggest that the processes involved in the navigation along the mental number line, which are related to the parietal mechanisms for spatial attention, and the processes involved in the semantic and verbal knowledge of numbers, are dissociable.

[1]  Patrik Vuilleumier,et al.  The Number Space and Neglect , 2004, Cortex.

[2]  Parashkev Nachev,et al.  Space and the parietal cortex , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[3]  Stella F. Lourenco,et al.  Spatial attention and the mental number line: Evidence for characteristic biases and compression , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[4]  John C. Marshall,et al.  When Right Goes Left: An Investigation of Line Bisection in a Case of Visual Neglect , 1989, Cortex.

[5]  J. Marshall,et al.  Spatial cognition: evidence from visual neglect , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[6]  Marinella Cappelletti,et al.  The middle house or the middle floor: Bisecting horizontal and vertical mental number lines in neglect , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[7]  S. Dehaene,et al.  THREE PARIETAL CIRCUITS FOR NUMBER PROCESSING , 2003, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[8]  F. Giorgi,et al.  Lost in number space after right brain damage: A neural signature of representational neglect , 2008, Cortex.

[9]  K. Priftis,et al.  Brain damage: Neglect disrupts the mental number line , 2002, Nature.

[10]  E. Bizzi,et al.  The Cognitive Neurosciences , 1996 .

[11]  E. Bisiach,et al.  Unilateral Neglect of Representational Space , 1978, Cortex.

[12]  Gui Xue,et al.  Neural substrates for forward and backward recitation of numbers and the alphabet: A close examination of the role of intraparietal sulcus and perisylvian areas , 2006, Brain Research.

[13]  Stanislas Dehaene,et al.  Arithmetic and the Brain This Review Comes from a Themed Issue on Cognitive Neuroscience Edited the Intraparietal Sulcus and Number Sense Number Sense in the Animal Brain , 2022 .

[14]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[15]  Margarete Delazer,et al.  The Mental Representation of Ordered Sequences in Visual Neglect , 2007, Cortex.

[16]  E. Capitani,et al.  Wisconsin card sorting test: a new global score, with Italian norms, and its relationship with the Weigl sorting test , 2000, Neurological Sciences.

[17]  Paul H. Garthwaite,et al.  Statistical Methods for Single-Case Studies in Neuropsychology: Comparing the Slope of a Patient's Regression Line with those of a Control Sample , 2004, Cortex.

[18]  P. Bartolomeo,et al.  Left unilateral neglect as a disconnection syndrome. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[19]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Interactions between number and space in parietal cortex , 2005, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[20]  Paola Guariglia,et al.  Dissociation between physical and mental number line bisection in right hemisphere brain damage , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[21]  S. Dehaene,et al.  The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. , 1993 .

[22]  J. Talairach,et al.  Co-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain: 3-Dimensional Proportional System: An Approach to Cerebral Imaging , 1988 .

[23]  J. Marshall,et al.  Visuo-spatial neglect: a new copying test to assess perceptual parsing , 2004, Journal of Neurology.

[24]  R. C. Oldfield THE ASSESSMENT AND ANALYSIS OF HANDEDNESS , 1971 .

[25]  P. Astikainen,et al.  Cortical and subcortical visual event‐related potentials to oddball stimuli in rabbits , 2000, Neuroreport.

[26]  Marco Zorzi,et al.  The spatial representation of numerical and non-numerical sequences: Evidence from neglect , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[27]  Jason B. Mattingley,et al.  Left to right: Representational biases for numbers and the effect of visuomotor adaptation , 2008, Cognition.

[28]  P. Bartolomeo,et al.  Right spatial neglect after left hemisphere stroke , 2004, Neurology.

[29]  D. C. Howell,et al.  Comparing an Individual's Test Score Against Norms Derived from Small Samples , 1998 .

[30]  Giuseppe Zappalà,et al.  The mini‐mental state examination: Normative study of an Italian random sample , 1993 .

[31]  Silke M. Göbel,et al.  Parietal rTMS distorts the mental number line: Simulating ‘spatial’ neglect in healthy subjects , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[32]  A. Young,et al.  “Neglect dyslexia” and the early visual processing of letters in words and nonwords , 1987 .

[33]  D. Pandya,et al.  Segmentation of subcomponents within the superior longitudinal fascicle in humans: a quantitative, in vivo, DT-MRI study. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.

[34]  L. Diller,et al.  Hemi-inattention in rehabilitation: the evolution of a rational remediation program. , 1977, Advances in neurology.

[35]  M. McCourt,et al.  Pseudoneglect: a review and meta-analysis of performance factors in line bisection tasks , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[36]  Mark Mennemeier,et al.  Biases in Attentional Orientation and Magnitude Estimation Explain Crossover: Neglect is a Disorder of Both , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[37]  Marco Zorzi,et al.  Explicit versus Implicit Processing of Representational Space in Neglect: Dissociations in Accessing the Mental Number Line , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[38]  C. Papagno,et al.  Verbal and spatial immediate memory span: Normative data from 1355 adults and 1112 children , 1987, The Italian Journal of Neurological Sciences.

[39]  D. Boisson,et al.  Does Action Make the Link Between Number and Space Representation? , 2004, Psychological science.

[40]  Filippo Brighina,et al.  Contralateral neglect induced by right posterior parietal rTMS in healthy subjects , 2000, Neuroreport.

[41]  L. Pizzamiglio,et al.  Cognitive rehabilitation of the hemineglect disorder in chronic patients with unilateral right brain damage. , 1992, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[42]  P. Maquet,et al.  Orienting Attention to Locations in Perceptual Versus Mental Representations , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[43]  P. Tabossi,et al.  Left neglect dyslexia and the processing of neglected information. , 1996, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[44]  Mark Mennemeier,et al.  Crossover by Line Length and Spatial Location , 2001, Brain and Cognition.

[45]  A. Paivio,et al.  Comparisons of mental clocks. , 1978, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[46]  R. Rafal,et al.  "Both" means more than "two": localizing and counting in patients with visuospatial neglect , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[47]  M. Albert A simple test of visual neglect , 1973, Neurology.