Behavioural trait assortment in a social network: patterns and implications

The social fine structure of a population plays a central role in ecological and evolutionary processes. Whilst many studies have investigated how morphological traits such as size affect social structure of populations, comparatively little is known about the influence of behaviours such as boldness and shyness. Using information on social interactions in a wild population of Trinidadian guppies (Poecilia reticulata), we construct a social network. For each individual in the network, we quantify its behavioural phenotype using two measures of boldness, predator inspection tendency, a repeatable and reliably measured behaviour well studied in the context of co-operation, and shoaling tendency. We observe striking heterogeneity in contact patterns, with strong ties being positively assorted and weak ties negatively assorted by our measured behavioural traits. Moreover, shy fish had more network connections than bold fish and these were on average stronger. In other words, social fine structure is strongly influenced by behavioural trait. We assert that such structure will have implications for the outcome of selection on behavioural traits and we speculate that the observed positive assortment may act as an amplifier of selection contributing to the maintenance of co-operation during predator inspection.

[1]  Steven J. Schwager,et al.  A comparison of association indices , 1987, Animal Behaviour.

[2]  I. Couzin,et al.  Mechanisms underlying shoal composition in the Trinidadian guppy, Poecilia reticulata , 2003 .

[3]  J. Krause,et al.  Sex-biased movement in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata) , 2003, Oecologia.

[4]  C. Ioannou,et al.  Predation Risk as a Driving Force for Sexual Segregation: A Cross‐Population Comparison , 2006, The American Naturalist.

[5]  Richard James,et al.  Social networks in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata) , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[6]  L. Dugatkin Do guppies play TIT FOR TAT during predator inspection visits? , 1988, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[7]  L. Dugatkin,et al.  Group Selection and Assortative Interactions , 1997, The American Naturalist.

[8]  Lee Alan Dugatkin,et al.  Tendency to inspect predators predicts mortality risk in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata) , 1992 .

[9]  Lee Alan Dugatkin,et al.  Guppies and the TIT FOR TAT strategy: preference based on past interaction , 1991, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[10]  Manfred Milinski,et al.  Size-dependent predation risk and partner quality in predator inspection of sticklebacks , 1992, Animal Behaviour.

[11]  J M Smith,et al.  Evolution and the theory of games , 1976 .

[12]  M. Newman,et al.  Mixing patterns in networks. , 2002, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[13]  Sam G. B. Roberts,et al.  Individual differences and personal social network size and structure. , 2008 .

[14]  M. Milinski,et al.  Do sticklebacks cooperate repeatedly in reciprocal pairs? , 1990, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[15]  L. Dugatkin,et al.  Assortative interactions and the evolution of cooperation during predator inspection in guppies (Poecilia reticulata) , 2000 .

[16]  T. Pitcher Behaviour of Teleost Fishes , 1986 .

[17]  Tina W. Wey,et al.  Social network analysis of animal behaviour: a promising tool for the study of sociality , 2008, Animal Behaviour.

[18]  G. Holton Sociobiology: the new synthesis? , 1977, Newsletter on science, technology & human values.

[19]  J. Krause,et al.  Potential banana skins in animal social network analysis , 2009, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[20]  Andrew Sih,et al.  Behavioral syndromes: an ecological and evolutionary overview. , 2004, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[21]  S. Budaev " Personality " in the Guppy ( Poecilia reticulata ) : A Correlational Study of Exploratory Behavior and Social Tendency , 2004 .

[22]  Francisco C. Santos,et al.  Cooperation Prevails When Individuals Adjust Their Social Ties , 2006, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[23]  J. Krause,et al.  Social organisation , 2022 .

[24]  Jan Lindström,et al.  Behavioural phenotype affects social interactions in an animal network , 2008, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[25]  R. Connor,et al.  Exploring Animal Social Networks, D.P. Croft, R. James, J. Krause. Princeton, New Jersey, Princeton University Press (2008), Pp. viii+192. Price $35.00 paperback , 2009 .

[26]  J. Terborgh,et al.  Oddity and the ‘confusion effect’ in predation , 1986, Animal Behaviour.

[27]  Anne E. Magurran,et al.  Individual differences and alternative behaviours , 1993 .

[28]  N. Dingemanse,et al.  Integrating animal temperament within ecology and evolution , 2007, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[29]  O. Ohguchi Experiments on the Selection against Colour Oddity of Water Fleas by Three‐Spined Sticklebacks , 2010 .

[30]  J. Krause,et al.  Social network theory in the behavioural sciences: potential applications , 2007, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[31]  Geoffrey Parker,et al.  Cooperation under predation risk: experiments on costs and benefits , 1997, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[32]  J. Krause,et al.  The social organization of fish shoals: a test of the predictive power of laboratory experiments for the field , 2000, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[33]  David Sloan Wilson,et al.  Adaptive individual differences within single populations. , 1998 .

[34]  Anne E. Magurran,et al.  Dicing with death: predator inspection behaviour in minnow shoals , 1986 .

[35]  D. Wilson,et al.  Shy-bold continuum in pumpkinseed sunfish (Lepomis gibbosus): An ecological study of a psychological trait. , 1993 .

[36]  Ruckstuhl TO SYNCHRONISE OR NOT TO SYNCHRONISE: A DILEMMA FOR YOUNG BIGHORN MALES? , 1999 .

[37]  Scott A. Davis,et al.  Who dares, benefits: predator approach behaviour in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata) deters predator pursuit , 1995, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[38]  C Athena Aktipis,et al.  Know when to walk away: contingent movement and the evolution of cooperation. , 2004, Journal of theoretical biology.

[39]  S. Gosling From mice to men: what can we learn about personality from animal research? , 2001, Psychological bulletin.

[40]  R. R. Krausz Living in Groups , 2013 .

[41]  K. N. Laland,et al.  Social structure and co-operative interactions in a wild population of guppies (Poecilia reticulata) , 2006, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[42]  C. Theodorakis Size segregation and the effects of oddity on predation risk in minnow schools , 1989, Animal Behaviour.

[43]  M. Milinski TIT FOR TAT in sticklebacks and the evolution of cooperation , 1987, Nature.

[44]  H. Ohtsuki,et al.  A simple rule for the evolution of cooperation on graphs and social networks , 2006, Nature.

[45]  L. Conradt,et al.  Could asynchrony in activity between the sexes cause intersexual social segregation in ruminants? , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[46]  J. Krause,et al.  Does defection during predator inspection affect social structure in wild shoals of guppies? , 2008, Animal Behaviour.

[47]  Geoffrey Parker,et al.  Cooperation under predation risk: a data-based ESS analysis , 1997, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[48]  F. Huntingford,et al.  The relationship between anti-predator behaviour and aggression among conspecifics in the three-spined stickleback, Gasterosteus Aculeatus , 1976, Animal Behaviour.

[49]  S. Dodson,et al.  Behavioural uniformity as a response to cues of predation risk , 2006, Animal Behaviour.

[50]  D. Lusseau,et al.  Animal social networks: an introduction , 2009, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[51]  A. Magurran,et al.  Information Transfer across Fish Shoals under Predator Threat , 2010 .

[52]  D. Croft,et al.  Male harassment drives females to alter habitat use and leads to segregation of the sexes , 2008, Biology Letters.