What’s in a word? A parametric study of semantic influences on visual word recognition

To what extent does semantic information play a functional role in visual word recognition? Theories of word recognition vary in the importance assigned to semantic information in visual lexical decision, with past research suggesting that the nature of the foils is a crucial determinant of semantic reliance. Here, we explored the conditions under which semantic variables influence lexical decision. Normal readers performed visual lexical decision tasks in which imageability and semantic priming were manipulated, with nonword foils varying systematically in their orthographic and phonological similarity to the real words. The effects of imageability and semantic priming increased in magnitude as nonword foils became progressively more wordlike. These findings provide a clear illustration of the flexible use of semantic information to support normal visual word recognition.

[1]  Timothy T. Rogers,et al.  NATURAL SELECTION: THE IMPACT OF SEMANTIC IMPAIRMENT ON LEXICAL AND OBJECT DECISION , 2004, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[2]  William D. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  The time course of visual word recognition as revealed by linear regression analysis of ERP data , 2006, NeuroImage.

[3]  G. Stone,et al.  Word identification in reading and the promise of subsymbolic psycholinguistics. , 1990, Psychological review.

[4]  Alexander Pollatsek,et al.  Basic Processes in Reading , 2013 .

[5]  S. Lupker,et al.  Ambiguity and visual word recognition: can feedback explain both homophone and polysemy effects? , 1999, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[6]  C. T. James.  The Role of Semantic Information in Lexical Decisions. , 1975 .

[7]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Are there mental lexicons? The role of semantics in lexical decision , 2010, Brain Research.

[8]  D. Plaut,et al.  Individual and developmental differences in semantic priming: empirical and computational support for a single-mechanism account of lexical processing. , 2000, Psychological review.

[9]  Maria Stein,et al.  The early context effect reflects activity in the temporo-prefrontal semantic system: Evidence from electrical neuroimaging of abstract and concrete word reading , 2008, NeuroImage.

[10]  John Duncan,et al.  Evidence for long-range feedback in target detection: Detection of semantic targets modulates activity in early visual areas , 2009, Neuropsychologia.

[11]  M Coltheart,et al.  DRC: a dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. , 2001, Psychological review.

[12]  James L. McClelland,et al.  More Words but Still No Lexicon: Reply to Besner et al. (1990) , 1990 .

[13]  Ayumu Matani,et al.  Early neural activation for lexico-semantic access in the left anterior temporal area analyzed by an fMRI-assisted MEG multidipole method , 2009, NeuroImage.

[14]  Chi-Shing Tse,et al.  Individual differences in the joint effects of semantic priming and word frequency: The role of lexical integrity. , 2009, Journal of memory and language.

[15]  Kenneth I Forster,et al.  DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy , 2003, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[16]  J Grainger,et al.  Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: a multiple read-out model. , 1996, Psychological review.

[17]  James L. McClelland,et al.  More Words but Still No Lexicon : Reply to Besner et al . ( 1990 ) , 1990 .

[18]  B. J. Casey,et al.  Semantic impairment with and without surface dyslexia: Implications for models of reading , 2005, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[19]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Computing the meanings of words in reading: cooperative division of labor between visual and phonological processes. , 2004, Psychological review.

[20]  C. Davis.  N-Watch: A program for deriving neighborhood size and other psycholinguistic statistics , 2005, Behavior research methods.

[21]  D. Besner,et al.  Visual word recognition: a multistage activation model. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[22]  S. Joordens,et al.  The long and short of semantic priming effects in lexical decision. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[23]  Colin J Davis,et al.  The spatial coding model of visual word identification. , 2010, Psychological review.

[24]  David C. Plaut,et al.  Structure and Function in the Lexical System: Insights from Distributed Models of Word Reading and Lexical Decision , 1997 .

[25]  J. Juola,et al.  Strategic reliance on phonological mediation in lexical access , 1997, Memory & cognition.

[26]  S. Lupker,et al.  Making things difficult in lexical decision: the impact of pseudohomophones and transposed-letter nonwords on frequency and semantic priming effects. , 2010, Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory and Cognition.

[27]  A. Ivanitsky,et al.  Rapid and slow brain systems of abstract and concrete words differentiation. , 2007, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[28]  H. Shulman,et al.  Control properties of semantic coding in a lexical decision task , 1977 .

[29]  J. H. Neely.  Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition: A selective review of current findings and theories. , 1991 .

[30]  William S Maki,et al.  A database of associative strengths from the strength-sampling model: A theory-based supplement to the Nelson, McEvoy, and Schreiber word association norms , 2008, Behavior research methods.

[31]  Michael J Cortese,et al.  Imageability ratings for 3,000 monosyllabic words , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.