Adaptations to normal human gait on potentially slippery surfaces: the effects of awareness and prior slip experience.

Prior knowledge of potentially slippery conditions has been shown to alter normal human gait in slip and fall experiments. Here we quantify the effects of two aspects of prior knowledge - awareness of a possible slip and prior slip experience - on normal gait. Sixty-eight subjects (40F, 28M) each walked over 48 high-friction surfaces (control trials) and 12 low-friction surfaces. Within- and between-subject changes in lower limb muscle activation, gait kinematics and ground reaction forces were analyzed in three non-slip control trials: one before and one after the first unexpected slip exposure, and a third after repeated slip exposures. Subjects knew they might slip in the latter two trials but not the first trial. Twenty subjects slipped during their first low-friction exposure (early slip group), 32 in later low-friction exposures (late slip group), and 16 subjects did not slip at all. Simultaneous changes in awareness and experience between the first two analyzed trials of the early slip group altered the muscle activity in both limbs, reduced the foot and knee angles at heel strike in the slip limb and reduced the ground reaction forces, impulses and utilized friction after heel strike in the slip limb. A change in only awareness between the first two analyzed trials of the late slip group produced the same kinematic changes seen in the early slip group, but only small muscle activity change and no kinetic changes. Subsequent slip experience in the late slip group produced the muscle activation and kinetic changes observed in the early slip group, but no further kinematic changes. These results showed that awareness of a potential slip primarily alters how the slip-limb approaches the floor, whereas prior slip experience primarily alters the anticipatory muscle activation and how the foot interacts with the floor. These muscle, kinematic and kinetic changes were consistent with a more cautious "normal" gait, and can reduce the external validity of slip and fall experiments.

[1]  J. Frank,et al.  Control of dynamic stability during gait termination on a slippery surface. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[2]  Mark I. Marpet,et al.  ON THRESHOLD VALUES THAT SEPARATE PEDESTRIAN WALKWAYS THAT ARE SLIP RESISTANT FROM THOSE THAT ARE NOT , 1996 .

[3]  R Grönqvist,et al.  Human-centred approaches in slipperiness measurement , 2001, Ergonomics.

[4]  A. Patla,et al.  Role of the unperturbed limb and arms in the reactive recovery response to an unexpected slip during locomotion. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[5]  Y-C Pai,et al.  Role of feedforward control of movement stability in reducing slip-related balance loss and falls among older adults. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  David J. Sanderson,et al.  Awareness Affects the Response of Human Subjects Exposed to a Single Whiplash-Like Perturbation , 2003, Spine.

[7]  M Tisserand,et al.  Progress in the prevention of falls caused by slipping. , 1985, Ergonomics.

[8]  A. Hof,et al.  Speed dependence of averaged EMG profiles in walking. , 2002, Gait & posture.

[9]  Lennart Strandberg,et al.  The dynamics of slipping accidents , 1981 .

[10]  Rieko Osu,et al.  Short- and long-term changes in joint co-contraction associated with motor learning as revealed from surface EMG. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[11]  A. Patla,et al.  Strategies for dynamic stability during locomotion on a slippery surface: effects of prior experience and knowledge. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[12]  T. Lockhart,et al.  Effects of age-related gait changes on the biomechanics of slips and falls , 2003, Ergonomics.

[13]  Sylvie Leclercq Prevention of Same Level Falls: A More Global Appreciation of This Type of Accident , 1999 .

[15]  M S Redfern,et al.  Predicting slips and falls considering required and available friction. , 1999, Ergonomics.

[16]  D. P. Manning,et al.  Deaths and injuries caused by slipping, tripping and falling. , 1983, Ergonomics.

[17]  P. J. Perkins,et al.  Measurement of Slip Between the Shoe and Ground During Walking , 1978 .

[18]  J. T. Inglis,et al.  The effect of subject awareness and prior slip experience on tribometer-based predictions of slip probability. , 2006, Gait & posture.

[19]  T. Lockhart,et al.  Age related effects of transitional floor surfaces and obstruction of view on gait characteristics related to slips and falls. , 2000, International journal of industrial ergonomics.

[20]  Y. Pai,et al.  Diminished stepping responses lead to a fall following a novel slip induced during a sit-to-stand. , 2004, Gait & posture.

[21]  Raoul Grönqvist,et al.  Detection of near accidents by measurement of horizontal acceleration of the trunk , 1994 .

[22]  Gordon L Warren,et al.  Temporal patterns of plantar pressures and lower-leg muscle activity during walking: effect of speed. , 2004, Gait & posture.

[23]  Bohdan T. Kulakowski,et al.  Evaluation of Performance of Three Slip Resistance Testers , 1989 .

[24]  F. Su,et al.  Effect of slip on movement of body center of mass relative to base of support. , 2001, Clinical Biomechanics.

[25]  T. M. Owings,et al.  Foot displacement but not velocity predicts the outcome of a slip induced in young subjects while walking. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[26]  Marco Schieppati,et al.  Effects of leg muscle tendon vibration on group Ia and group II reflex responses to stance perturbation in humans , 2003, The Journal of physiology.

[27]  J. T. Inglis,et al.  Rapid neck muscle adaptation alters the head kinematics of aware and unaware subjects undergoing multiple whiplash-like perturbations. , 2003, Journal of biomechanics.

[28]  R. Cham,et al.  Changes in gait when anticipating slippery floors. , 2002, Gait & Posture.