Validation of 3D Velocity Models Using Earthquakes with Shallow Slip: Case Study of the 2014 Mw 6.0 South Napa, California, Event

3D velocity models constitute a key element in strong ground motion modeling, for example, earthquake‐hazard assessment. Their validation is typically based on modeling weak earthquakes with foci limited to depths greater than ∼5  km. However, ruptures during moderate and large earthquakes can propagate to shallower depths (and eventually reach the surface). For such shallow sources, velocity models may not be validated with sufficient accuracy. In this respect, we conduct a series of tests based on the 2014 M w 6.0 South Napa earthquake, which was characterized by a very shallow slip asperity, to assess the performance of the U.S. Geological Survey 3D San Francisco Bay area velocity model within 20‐km fault distance. Our study indicates that the velocity model performs generally well with some exceptions, in which large‐amplitude surface waves not present in the observed data are systematically excited. We conclude that more complex fault geometries or slightly deeper slip would not result in a better fit of the observed data. Contrarily, we demonstrate that smoothing the velocity model (i.e., reducing the strong velocity contrasts between basin fill and bedrock) effectively attenuates the spurious oscillations. [Electronic Supplement:][1] Description of the smoothing process, figures showing results for alternative fault geometry, other inversion tests and waveform comparisons, and a movie of wave propagation. [1]: http://www.bssaonline.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1785/0120160041/-/DC1

[1]  Chen Ji,et al.  Rupture history of 2014 Mw 6.0 South Napa earthquake inferred from near‐fault strong motion data and its impact to the practice of ground strong motion prediction , 2015 .

[2]  C. Kesselman,et al.  CyberShake: A Physics-Based Seismic Hazard Model for Southern California , 2011 .

[4]  M. Bouchon A simple method to calculate Green's functions for elastic layered media , 1981 .

[5]  S. Hartzell,et al.  Simulated ground motion in Santa Clara Valley, California, and vicinity from M≥6.7 scenario earthquakes , 2008 .

[6]  R. Archuleta,et al.  A new nonlinear finite fault inversion with three-dimensional Green's functions: Application to the 1989 Loma Prieta, California, earthquake , 2004 .

[7]  J. Zahradník,et al.  Rupture process of the 2014 Cephalonia, Greece, earthquake doublet (Mw6) as inferred from regional and local seismic data , 2015 .

[8]  Robert W. Graves,et al.  Ground-motion amplification in the Santa Monica area: Effects of shallow basin-edge structure , 1998, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[9]  P. Maechling,et al.  Strong shaking in Los Angeles expected from southern San Andreas earthquake , 2006 .

[10]  David Carver,et al.  Modeling and Validation of a 3D Velocity Structure for the Santa Clara Valley, California, for Seismic-Wave Simulations , 2006 .

[11]  Jonathan P. Stewart,et al.  Broadband simulations for Mw 7.8 southern San Andreas earthquakes: Ground motion sensitivity to rupture speed , 2008 .

[12]  Gregory C. Beroza,et al.  Testing Community Velocity Models for Southern California Using the Ambient Seismic Field , 2008 .

[13]  Kojiro Irikura,et al.  Three-dimensional simulation of the near-fault ground motion for the 1995 Hyogo-Ken Nanbu (Kobe), Japan, earthquake , 1998, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[14]  Arthur Frankel,et al.  A three-dimensional simulation of seismic waves in the Santa Clara Valley, California, from a Loma Prieta aftershock , 1992 .

[15]  Arthur J. Rodgers,et al.  Kinematic finite-source model for the 24 August 2014 South Napa, California, earthquake from joint inversion of seismic, GPS, and InSAR data , 2015 .

[16]  František Gallovič,et al.  Modeling Velocity Recordings of the Mw 6.0 South Napa, California, Earthquake: Unilateral Event with Weak High-Frequency Directivity , 2016 .

[17]  Eric J. Fielding,et al.  Geodetic Constraints on the 2014 M 6.0 South Napa Earthquake , 2015 .

[18]  Shawn Larsen,et al.  Moderate Earthquake Ground-Motion Validation in the San Francisco Bay Area , 2010 .

[19]  N. Anders Petersson,et al.  Broadband Waveform Modeling of Moderate Earthquakes in the San Francisco Bay Area and Preliminary Assessment of the USGS 3D Seismic Velocity Model , 2008 .

[20]  M. Ewald,et al.  Source-related variations of ground motions in 3-D media: application to the Newport-Inglewood fault, Los Angeles Basin , 2008 .

[21]  N. Anders Petersson,et al.  Ground-motion modeling of Hayward fault scenario earthquakes, part II: Simulation of long-period and broadband ground motions , 2009 .

[22]  D. Melgar,et al.  California: Rapid Response and Modeling of Fast Rupture on a Dipping Strike-slip Fault , 2022 .

[23]  Kenneth W. Hudnut,et al.  The 2014 Mw 6.1 South Napa Earthquake: A Unilateral Rupture with Shallow Asperity and Rapid Afterslip , 2015 .

[24]  Carl Tape,et al.  Seismic tomography of the southern California crust based on spectral‐element and adjoint methods , 2010 .

[25]  K. Koketsu,et al.  Propagation of seismic ground motion in the Kanto Basin, Japan. , 2000, Science.

[26]  P. Mai,et al.  Variability of Near-Field Ground Motion from Dynamic Earthquake Rupture Simulations , 2008 .

[27]  Thomas H. Jordan,et al.  Testing Waveform Predictions of 3D Velocity Models Against Two Recent Los Angeles Earthquakes , 2014 .

[28]  S. Hartzell,et al.  Ground-motion simulations of 1811–1812 New Madrid earthquakes, central United States , 2015 .

[29]  Jean-Paul Ampuero,et al.  A New Strategy to Compare Inverted Rupture Models Exploiting the Eigenstructure of the Inverse Problem , 2015 .