Towards Locally Differentially Private Generic Graph Metric Estimation

Local differential privacy (LDP) is an emerging technique for privacy-preserving data collection without a trusted collector. Despite its strong privacy guarantee, LDP cannot be easily applied to real-world graph analysis tasks such as community detection and centrality analysis due to its high implementation complexity and low data utility. In this paper, we address these two issues by presenting LF-GDPR, the first LDP-enabled graph metric estimation framework for graph analysis. It collects two atomic graph metrics — the adjacency bit vector and node degree — from each node locally. LF-GDPR simplifies the job of implementing LDP-related steps (e.g., local perturbation, aggregation and calibration) for a graph metric estimation task by providing either a complete or a parameterized algorithm for each step.

[1]  Xiaofeng Meng,et al.  PrivKV: Key-Value Data Collection with Local Differential Privacy , 2019, 2019 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP).

[2]  Sofya Raskhodnikova,et al.  Smooth sensitivity and sampling in private data analysis , 2007, STOC '07.

[3]  Petra Perner,et al.  Data Mining - Concepts and Techniques , 2002, Künstliche Intell..

[4]  Ting Yu,et al.  Publishing Attributed Social Graphs with Formal Privacy Guarantees , 2016, SIGMOD Conference.

[5]  David D. Jensen,et al.  Accurate Estimation of the Degree Distribution of Private Networks , 2009, 2009 Ninth IEEE International Conference on Data Mining.

[6]  Cynthia Dwork,et al.  Calibrating Noise to Sensitivity in Private Data Analysis , 2006, TCC.

[7]  Yin Yang,et al.  Generating Synthetic Decentralized Social Graphs with Local Differential Privacy , 2017, CCS.

[8]  Martin J. Wainwright,et al.  Local privacy and statistical minimax rates , 2013, 2013 51st Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing (Allerton).

[9]  Xiaowei Xu,et al.  SCAN: a structural clustering algorithm for networks , 2007, KDD '07.

[10]  Sofya Raskhodnikova,et al.  Analyzing Graphs with Node Differential Privacy , 2013, TCC.

[11]  Xiao Zhang,et al.  Localization and centrality in networks , 2014, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[12]  S L Warner,et al.  Randomized response: a survey technique for eliminating evasive answer bias. , 1965, Journal of the American Statistical Association.

[13]  Gerome Miklau,et al.  Exponential random graph estimation under differential privacy , 2014, KDD.