Evaluating the impact of spatial resolution on tropospheric NO2 column comparisons within urban areas using high-resolution airborne data.

NASA deployed the GeoTASO airborne UV-Visible spectrometer in May-June 2017 to produce high resolution (approximately 250 × 250 m) gapless NO2 datasets over the western shore of Lake Michigan and over the Los Angeles Basin. The results collected show that the airborne tropospheric vertical column retrievals compare well with ground-based Pandora spectrometer column NO2 observations (r2=0.91 and slope of 1.03). Apparent disagreements between the two measurements can be sensitive to the coincidence criteria and are often associated with large local variability, including rapid temporal changes and spatial heterogeneity that may be observed differently by the sunward viewing Pandora observations. The gapless mapping strategy executed during the 2017 GeoTASO flights provides data suitable for averaging to coarser areal resolutions to simulate satellite retrievals. As simulated satellite pixel area increases to values typical of TEMPO, TROPOMI, and OMI, the agreement with Pandora measurements degraded, particularly for the most polluted columns as localized large pollution enhancements observed by Pandora and GeoTASO are spatially averaged with nearby less-polluted locations within the larger area representative of the satellite spatial resolutions (aircraft-to-Pandora slope: TEMPO scale=0.88; TROPOMI scale=0.77; OMI scale=0.57). In these two regions, Pandora and TEMPO or TROPOMI have the potential to compare well at least up to pollution scales of 30×1015 molecules cm-2. Two publicly available OMI tropospheric NO2 retrievals are both found to be biased low with respect to these Pandora observations. However, the agreement improves when higher resolution a priori inputs are used for the tropospheric air mass factor calculation (NASA V3 Standard Product slope = 0.18 and Berkeley High Resolution Product slope=0.30). Overall, this work explores best practices for satellite validation strategies with Pandora direct-sun observations by showing the sensitivity to product spatial resolution and demonstrating how the high spatial resolution NO2 data retrieved from airborne spectrometers, such as GeoTASO, can be used with high temporal resolution ground-based column observations to evaluate the influence of spatial heterogeneity on validation results.

[1]  Robert J. D. Spurr,et al.  Air-mass factor formulation for spectroscopic measurements from satellites: application to formaldeh , 2001 .

[2]  James F. Gleason,et al.  A new stratospheric and tropospheric NO2 retrieval algorithm for nadir-viewing satellite instruments : applications to OMI , 2013 .

[3]  M. V. Roozendael,et al.  High-resolution NO 2 remote sensing from the Airborne Prism EXperiment (APEX) imaging spectrometer , 2012 .

[4]  P. Monks,et al.  High-resolution measurements from the airborne Atmospheric Nitrogen Dioxide Imager (ANDI) , 2015 .

[5]  Pius Lee,et al.  OMI NO 2 column densities over North American urban cities: the effect of satellite footprint resolution , 2015 .

[6]  M. Prather.  Catastrophic loss of stratospheric ozone in dense volcanic clouds , 1992 .

[7]  Eric Bucsela,et al.  A high spatial resolution retrieval of NO 2 column densities from OMI: method and evaluation , 2011 .

[8]  Yuhang Wang,et al.  Seasonal budgets of reactive nitrogen species and ozone over the United States, and export fluxes to the global atmosphere , 1998 .

[9]  Fei Liu,et al.  NO x lifetimes and emissions of cities and power plants in polluted background estimated by satellite observations , 2016 .

[10]  E. J. Llewellyn,et al.  Fast NO 2 retrievals from Odin-OSIRIS limb scatter measurements , 2010 .

[11]  J. Herman,et al.  First Top‐Down Estimates of Anthropogenic NOx Emissions Using High‐Resolution Airborne Remote Sensing Observations , 2018 .

[12]  J. Burrows,et al.  High-resolution airborne imaging DOAS-measurements of NO2 above Bucharest during AROMAT , 2016 .

[13]  A. Richter,et al.  Intercomparison of four airborne imaging DOAS systems for tropospheric NO2 mapping – the AROMAPEX campaign , 2019, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques.

[14]  M. V. Roozendael,et al.  High-resolution mapping of the NO 2 spatial distribution over Belgian urban areas based on airborne APEX remote sensing , 2017 .

[15]  J. Burrows,et al.  Influence of low spatial resolution a priori data on tropospheric NO 2 satellite retrievals , 2011 .

[16]  Gang Li,et al.  The HITRAN 2008 molecular spectroscopic database , 2005 .

[17]  Robert J. D. Spurr,et al.  VLIDORT: A linearized pseudo-spherical vector discrete ordinate radiative transfer code for forward model and retrieval studies in multilayer multiple scattering media , 2006 .

[18]  Ryan Thalman,et al.  Temperature dependent absorption cross-sections of O2-O2 collision pairs between 340 and 630 nm and at atmospherically relevant pressure. , 2013, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[19]  Ann Carine Vandaele,et al.  Measurements of the NO2 absorption cross-section from 42 000 cm−1 to 10 000 cm−1 (238–1000 nm) at 220 K and 294 K , 1998 .

[20]  Jassim A. Al-Saadi,et al.  The Dawn of Geostationary Air Quality Monitoring: Case Studies From Seoul and Los Angeles , 2018, Front. Environ. Sci..

[21]  Pinhua Xie,et al.  Observations of tropospheric NO2 using ground based MAX-DOAS and OMI measurements during the Shanghai World Expo 2010 , 2015 .

[22]  J. Burrows,et al.  Effect of surface BRDF of various land cover types on geostationary observations of tropospheric NO2 , 2014 .

[23]  R. Draxler,et al.  US National Air Quality Forecast Capability: Expanding Coverage to Include Particulate Matter , 2011 .

[24]  Nickolay A. Krotkov,et al.  The version 3 OMI NO 2 standard product , 2017 .

[25]  Quintus Kleipool,et al.  Earth surface reflectance climatology from 3 years of OMI data , 2008 .

[26]  Michael Eisinger,et al.  The Global Ozone Monitoring Experiment (GOME): Mission Concept and First Scientific Results , 1999 .

[27]  Jassim A. Al-Saadi,et al.  Impacts of background ozone production on Houston and Dallas, Texas, air quality during the Second Texas Air Quality Study field mission , 2009 .

[28]  W. Qin,et al.  ANALYSIS OF ACCURACY OF MODIS BRDF PRODUCT (MCD43 C6) BASED ON MISR LAND SURFACE BRF PRODUCT – A CASE STUDY OF THE CENTRAL PART OF NORTHEAST ASIA , 2018 .

[29]  R. Martin,et al.  Retrieving tropospheric nitrogen dioxide from the Ozone Monitoring Instrument: effects of aerosols, surface reflectance anisotropy, and vertical profile of nitrogen dioxide , 2013 .

[30]  R. Cohen,et al.  Evaluation of version 3.0B of the BEHR OMI NO2 product , 2019, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques.

[31]  David G. Streets,et al.  A high-resolution and observationally constrained OMI NO 2 satellite retrieval , 2017 .

[32]  J. Burrows,et al.  A wide field-of-view imaging DOAS instrument for two-dimensional trace gas mapping from aircraft , 2015 .

[33]  D P Edwards,et al.  Tropospheric emissions: monitoring of pollution (TEMPO) , 2012, Optics & Photonics - Optical Engineering + Applications.

[34]  Dominik Brunner,et al.  High-resolution NO₂ remote sensing from the Airborne Prism EXperiment (APEX) imaging spectrometer , 2012 .

[35]  Eric Bucsela,et al.  Observation of slant column NO2 using the super-zoom mode of AURA-OMI , 2011 .

[36]  Monitoring Aerosol Properties in East Asia from Geostationary Orbit: GOCI, MI and GEMS , 2017 .

[37]  B. Hannegan,et al.  Stratospheric ozone in 3-D models : A simple chemistry and the cross-tropopause flux , 2000 .

[38]  R. C. Hudman,et al.  Effects of model resolution on the interpretation of satellite NO 2 observations , 2011 .

[39]  Xiong Liu,et al.  Nitrogen dioxide and formaldehyde measurements from the GEOstationary Coastal and Air Pollution Events (GEO-CAPE) Airborne Simulator over Houston, Texas , 2018, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques.

[40]  Jay R. Herman,et al.  High‐resolution NO2 observations from the Airborne Compact Atmospheric Mapper: Retrieval and validation , 2017 .

[41]  Steffen Beirle,et al.  Improving algorithms and uncertainty estimates for satellite NO2 retrievals: results from the quality assurance for the essential climate variables (QA4ECV) project , 2018, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques.

[42]  Alan H. Strahler,et al.  An algorithm for the retrieval of albedo from space using semiempirical BRDF models , 2000, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[43]  Paul Ingmann,et al.  Requirements for the GMES Atmosphere Service and ESA's implementation concept: Sentinels-4/-5 and -5p , 2012 .

[44]  Steffen Beirle,et al.  Megacity Emissions and Lifetimes of Nitrogen Oxides Probed from Space , 2011, Science.

[45]  A. Kokhanovsky,et al.  Intra-pixel variability in satellite tropospheric NO 2 column densities derived from simultaneous space-borne and airborne observations over the South African Highveld , 2018 .

[46]  Peter Spietz,et al.  High-resolution absorption cross-section of glyoxal in the UV–vis and IR spectral ranges , 2005 .

[47]  Henk Eskes,et al.  An improved tropospheric NO 2 column retrieval algorithm for the Ozone Monitoring Instrument , 2011 .

[48]  Jay R. Herman,et al.  Comparison of ozone retrievals from the Pandora spectrometer system and Dobson spectrophotometer in Boulder, Colorado , 2015 .

[49]  J. Herman,et al.  Effects of local meteorology and aerosols on ozone and nitrogen dioxide retrievals from OMI and pandora spectrometers in Maryland, USA during DISCOVER-AQ 2011 , 2013, Journal of Atmospheric Chemistry.

[50]  Kelly Chance,et al.  An improved high-resolution solar reference spectrum for earth's atmosphere measurements in the ultraviolet, visible, and near infrared , 2010 .

[51]  R. Cohen,et al.  The Berkeley High Resolution Tropospheric NO2 product , 2018, Earth System Science Data.

[52]  Matthew Kowalewski,et al.  The GeoTASO airborne spectrometer project , 2014, Optics & Photonics - Optical Engineering + Applications.

[53]  Heikki Saari,et al.  The ozone monitoring instrument , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[54]  Xiong Liu,et al.  Ozone profile retrievals from the Ozone Monitoring Instrument , 2009 .

[55]  James F. Gleason,et al.  Evaluation of OMI operational standard NO 2 column retrievals using in situ and surface-based NO 2 observations , 2014 .

[56]  Jassim A. Al-Saadi,et al.  Nitrogen dioxide observations from the Geostationary Trace gas and Aerosol Sensor Optimization (GeoTASO) airborne instrument: Retrieval algorithm and measurements during DISCOVER-AQ Texas 2013 , 2015 .

[57]  Matthew G. Kowalewski,et al.  Remote sensing capabilities of the GEO-CAPE airborne simulator , 2014, Optics & Photonics - Optical Engineering + Applications.

[58]  Jay R. Herman,et al.  NO2 and HCHO measurements in Korea from 2012 to 2016 from Pandora spectrometer instruments compared with OMI retrievals and with aircraft measurements during the KORUS-AQ campaign , 2018, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques.

[59]  Maria Tzortziou,et al.  NO2 column amounts from ground‐based Pandora and MFDOAS spectrometers using the direct‐sun DOAS technique: Intercomparisons and application to OMI validation , 2009 .