Principles of a Geometry Program for Architecture | Experiences, Examples, and Evaluations
暂无分享,去创建一个
Geometryisabasicscienceforarchitecture. Duringthepastcenturies therewerevariousevaluationsoftheroleofgeometryforarchitecture. Especially inthelastdecadestheimportanceofdescriptivegeometrywaspushedbackmore or less in most countries. Some countries try to keep the traditional descriptive geometry discipline, others replace it by training CAD-systems. Both ways have someunderstandable reasons,but both letmissingimportantpointsofanactual geometryeducation. Ontheonehanditisnotenoughtokeeponlythetraditional discipline, on the other hand geometricalknowledgeis still a necessary condition forarchitecture,and this geometricalbasis is not reachedonly by training CAD- systems. Asresponsiblesfortheeducationofthestudentsofarchitecturewehave to react to the challenges of our times and we have to be aware of the new, but alsotheremainingrequestsofteachinggeometryforarchitecture. In this paper the principles of such a geometry program will be presented and explainedbyexamplesfromthepastteachingexperiencesatUniversityofKaisers- lautern in Germany. The concept is exposed in a textbook and exercise material
[1] Gary R. Bertoline. Visual Science: An Emerging Discipline 1 , 1998 .
[2] Kazimir Severinovich Malevich,et al. Suprematismus : die gegenstandslose Welt , 1962 .
[3] Sheryl A. Sorby,et al. International Experiences in Developing the Spatial Visualization Abilities of Engineering Students , 2001 .
[4] S. Vandenberg,et al. Mental Rotations, a Group Test of Three-Dimensional Spatial Visualization , 1978, Perceptual and motor skills.