Realigning Higher Education for the 21st-Century Learner through Multi-Access Learning

Twenty-first-century learners have expectations that are not met within the current model of higher education. With the introduction of online learning, the anytime/anywhere mantra taken up by many postsecondary institutions was a first step to meeting learner needs for flexibility; however, the choice and determination of delivery mode still resides with the institution and course instructors. Recently, the massive open online course (MOOC) movement has been introduced as an undeniable force in higher education, and the authors argue that it is distracting leadership from focusing on alternative options for supporting the needs of learners who demand both personalization and real access to learning opportunities. The key element to the MOOC movement is its openness that enables student access to education. In this article, the authors present the multi-access learning framework that envelops the MOOC phenomenon and merges course access modes enabling student choice and agency. The authors report results from a pilot study on one type of multi-access course, where students were able to choose their mode of access. In this case, remote students accessed the course via webcam and joined their on-campus classmates and instructor who were together face-to-face. Implications for multi-access learning in relation to the MOOC movement are discussed.

[1]  B. Zimmerman Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. , 2000 .

[2]  D. Neubauer,et al.  The end of the university as we know it , 2011 .

[3]  Vol. Merlot Journal of Online Learning and Teaching , 2022 .

[4]  C. Osvaldo Rodriguez,et al.  MOOCs and the AI-Stanford Like Courses: Two Successful and Distinct Course Formats for Massive Open Online Courses. , 2012 .

[5]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  Psychological theory and the design of innovative learning environments: On procedures, principles, and systems. , 1996 .

[6]  P. Salvatori,et al.  Implementing a problem‐based learning curriculum in occupational therapy: A conceptual model , 2000 .

[7]  Paul W. Richardson The culture of education , 1996 .

[8]  A. Bandura Social cognitive theory: an agentic perspective. , 1999, Annual review of psychology.

[9]  Ruth Sutherland,et al.  Teaching a fishbowl tutorial: sink or swim? , 2012, The clinical teacher.

[10]  Barbara Means,et al.  Evaluation of Evidence-Based Practices in Online Learning: A Meta-Analysis and Review of Online Learning Studies , 2009 .

[11]  P. Pintrich,et al.  Handbook of self-regulation , 2000 .

[12]  Michael F. Beaudoin Online learning as a strategic asset , 2009 .

[13]  Steve Kolowich,et al.  The Professors behind the MOOC Hype. , 2013 .

[14]  Jennifer L. Dyck,et al.  iTunes University and the classroom: Can podcasts replace Professors? , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[15]  J. Lave Teaching, as Learning, in Practice , 1996 .

[16]  George Siemens Connectivism: A Learning Theory for the Digital Age , 2004 .

[17]  Patricia W Neely,et al.  Unbundling faculty roles in online distance education programs , 2010 .

[18]  A. Brown Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation, and other more mysterious mechanisms , 1987 .

[19]  E. Wenger Communities of practice: learning as a social system , 1998 .

[20]  Michael J. Prince,et al.  Inductive Teaching and Learning Methods: Definitions, Comparisons, and Research Bases , 2006 .

[21]  Andy P. Field,et al.  Discovering Statistics Using SPSS , 2000 .

[22]  Rebecca Walker,et al.  Can inquiry‐based learning strengthen the links between teaching and disciplinary research? , 2010 .

[23]  A. Bandura Toward a Psychology of Human Agency , 2006, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[24]  Leona Schauble,et al.  Innovations in learning : new environments for education , 1996 .

[25]  J. Daniel,et al.  Making Sense of MOOCs : Musings in a Maze of Myth , Paradox and Possibility Author : , 2013 .

[26]  Paul R. Pintrich,et al.  Self-Regulation: Directions and Challenges for Future Research , 2000 .

[27]  Mary K. Tallent-Runnels,et al.  Teaching Courses Online: A Review of the Research , 2006 .

[28]  Brian Jurewitsch,et al.  A Mixed-methods Systematic Review of Online versus Face-to-face Problem-based Learning , 2012 .

[29]  Christopher R. Jones,et al.  Net generation or Digital Natives: Is there a distinct new generation entering university? , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[30]  John W. Creswell,et al.  Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research , 2006 .

[31]  Xiao Di-sheng,et al.  End the University as We Know It , 2010 .

[32]  Philip H. Winne,et al.  Studying as self-regulated learning. , 1998 .

[33]  Michael E. Ward,et al.  Student and Faculty Perceptions of the Quality of Online Learning Experiences , 2010 .

[34]  Spss,et al.  Discovering Statistics (4th Edition ed. , 2013 .

[35]  Andy Field,et al.  Discovering statistics using SPSS, 2nd ed. , 2005 .

[36]  Chad J. McGuire,et al.  An Analysis of Student Self-Assessment of Online, Blended, and Face-to-Face Learning Environments: Implications for Sustainable Education Delivery , 2010 .

[37]  Valerie Irvine,et al.  The Emergence of Choice in “Multi-Access” Learning Environments: Transferring Locus of Control of Course Access to the Learner , 2009 .

[38]  A. Klegeris,et al.  Impact of problem-based learning in a large classroom setting: student perception and problem-solving skills. , 2011, Advances in physiology education.

[39]  Gail A. Herndon The chronicle of higher education , 1977 .