Physiological Significance of Coronary Flow Velocity and Changing Stenosis Geometry during Coronary Vasodilation in Awake Dogs

In order to describe the mechanisms and significance of coronary flow velocity and increased stenosis severity during coronary vasodilation, we determined stenosis geometry by quantitative coronary arteriography in conscious dogs at resting and high coronary flows. The circumflex coronary artery was instrumented with a Doppler flow velocity transducer, periarterial balloon constrictor, and small implanted arterial catheters proximal and distal to the constrictor for contrast injection and pressure measurements. Biplane, orthogonal x-rays of coronary stenosis were taken in mid-diastole at resting and high coronary blood flow after intracoronary papaverine. Arterial borders on x-ray prints were outlined on a digitizing tablet and stenoses reconstructed in three dimensions by computer. Dimensions for each of 51 stenoses ranging from 45% to 78% diameter narrowing were compared before and after papaverine with three important findings: (1) There was no significant change in the minimum cross-sectional area or in exit outflow angle of the stenosis from resting to high coronary flow. Cross-sectional area of the normal artery proximal and distal to the stenosis increased significantly during high flow by 16% and 12%, respectively (P < 0.001), thereby causing diameter stenosis to increase from 68% to 71% (P < 0.001) associated with a 16% increase in the pressure gradient across the stenosis due solely to changes in stenosis geometry. These observations raise basic questions about how stenosis severity should be defined. (2) The cross-sectional area of the artery within the chronically implanted Doppler transducer increased by 32% with vasodilation despite perivascular scarring within the transducer observed at postmortem. Consequently, relative changes in coronary flow velocity were 30–40% less than changes in volume flow, thereby introducing a significant error in measuring relative coronary flow responses unless changes in arterial diameter were also determined.

[1]  E L Bolson,et al.  Experimental Validation of Quantitative Coronary Arteriography for Determining Pressure-Flow Characteristics of Coronary Stenosis , 1982, Circulation.

[2]  W. Santamore,et al.  Effect of norepinephrine on coronary hemodynamics in coronary stenotic canine model. , 1980, American heart journal.

[3]  K. Gould,et al.  Dynamic coronary stenosis. , 1980, The American journal of cardiology.

[4]  W. Santamore,et al.  Altered coronary flow responses to vasoactive drugs in the presence of coronary arterial stenosis in the dog. , 1980, The American journal of cardiology.

[5]  W. Santamore,et al.  Dynamic changes in the haemodynamic severity of coronary artery stenosis in a canine model. , 1979, Cardiovascular research.

[6]  J. Cohn,et al.  Effect of dilation of the distal coronary bed on flow and resistance in severely stenotic coronary arteries in the dog. , 1979, The American journal of cardiology.

[7]  K. Gould,et al.  Techniques for arteriography and hydraulic analysis of coronary stenoses in unsedated dogs. , 1978, The American journal of physiology.

[8]  K. Gould,et al.  Pressure‐Flow Characteristics of Coronary Stenoses in Unsedated Dogs at Rest and during Coronary Vasodilation , 1978, Circulation research.

[9]  G. Brooker,et al.  Papaverine blockade of an inward slow Ca2+ current in guinea pig heart. , 1975, Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology.

[10]  S. E. Logan,et al.  On the Fluid Mechanics of Human Coronary Artery Stenosis , 1975, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[11]  N R Cholvin,et al.  Pressure Drop across Artificially Induced Stenoses in the Femoral Arteries of Dogs , 1975, Circulation research.

[12]  K. Lipscomb,et al.  Compensatory changes of the distal coronary vascular bed during progressive coronary constriction. , 1975, Circulation.

[13]  S. Rodbard Vascular caliber. , 1975, Cardiology.

[14]  R. Berguer,et al.  Critical Arterial Stenosis: A Theoretical and Experimental Solution , 1974, Annals of surgery.

[15]  W. Schenk,et al.  Effects of local vasodilatation on blood flow through arterial stenosis. A theoretical analysis of the pressure-flow dynamics. , 1973, European surgical research. Europaische chirurgische Forschung. Recherches chirurgicales europeennes.

[16]  S. Vatner,et al.  Simultaneous comparison and calibration of the Doppler and electromagnetic flowmeters. , 1970, Journal of applied physiology.

[17]  M. Lie,et al.  Local Regulation of Vascular Cross Section during Changes in Femoral Arterial Blood Flow in Dogs , 1970, Circulation research.

[18]  S. Leraand,et al.  Dilatation of a medium-sized artery immediately after local changes of blood pressure and flow as measured by ultrasonic technique. , 1970, Acta physiologica Scandinavica.

[19]  M. R. Roach,et al.  CHANGES IN ARTERIAL DISTENSIBILITY AS A CAUSE OF POSTSTENOTIC DILATATION. , 1963, The American journal of cardiology.

[20]  G. D. Tracy,et al.  TECHNIQUES OF ARTERIOGRAPHY , 1960, The Medical journal of Australia.

[21]  S. Hilton A peripheral arterial conducting mechanism underlying dilatation of the femoral artery and concerned in functional vasodilatation in skeletal muscle , 1959, The Journal of physiology.

[22]  R. E. Shipley,et al.  THE EFFECT OF EXTERNAL CONSTRICTION OF A BLOOD VESSEL ON BLOOD FLOW , 1944 .