The impact of Customer Baseline Load (CBL) calculation methods on Peak Time Rebate program offered to residential customers

Abstract This paper investigates the impact of CBL's performance on PTR programs offered to the residential customers. For the purpose of analysis, HighXofY (NYISO), exponential moving average (ISONE), regression methods and their adjusted forms are first introduced and then employed to calculate the CBL. Irish Commission for Energy Regulation (CER) smart metering trial dataset is used for this analysis. Furthermore, the metrics of accuracy, bias and Overall Performance Index (OPI) are introduced and then applied to carry out error analysis. Residential customers as opposed to industrial customers show a high degree of unpredictability due to multitudes of non-correlated personal and household activities. Therefore, an approach is also proposed in this paper to harness the randomness of individual customers’ consumption. Also, it is necessary to examine how the metrics affect DR programs financially for the sake of reaching a valid conclusion about the overall performance of CBL methods. Consequently, a PTR program for a case of 260 customers is investigated as a case study. Results from this case study as well as their discussion are provided at the end.

[1]  Karl Aberer,et al.  When Bias Matters: An Economic Assessment of Demand Response Baselines for Residential Customers , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[2]  Johanna L. Mathieu,et al.  How Baseline Model Implementation Choices Affect Demand Response Assessments , 2015 .

[3]  H. Chao Demand response in wholesale electricity markets: the choice of customer baseline , 2011 .

[4]  Kevin Tomsovic,et al.  Residential customers elasticity estimation and clustering based on their contribution at incentive based demand response , 2016, 2016 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting (PESGM).

[5]  Sila Kiliccote,et al.  Estimating Demand Response Load Impacts: Evaluation of BaselineLoad Models for Non-Residential Buildings in California , 2008 .

[6]  F. Wolak An Experimental Comparison of Critical Peak and Hourly Pricing: The PowerCentsDC Program* , 2010 .

[7]  D. Kirschen,et al.  Quantifying the Effect of Demand Response on Electricity Markets , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[8]  Farrokh Rahimi,et al.  Demand Response as a Market Resource Under the Smart Grid Paradigm , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[9]  A. Faruqui,et al.  Quantifying Customer Response to Dynamic Pricing , 2005 .

[10]  Saeed Mohajeryami,et al.  A novel economic model for price-based demand response , 2016 .

[11]  H. Chao,et al.  Incentive effects of paying demand response in wholesale electricity markets , 2013 .

[12]  Sanem Sergici,et al.  Piloting the Smart Grid , 2009 .

[13]  Sila Kiliccote,et al.  Statistical analysis of baseline load models for non-residential buildings , 2009 .

[14]  Payam Teimourzadeh Baboli,et al.  Including the behavioral aspects of customers in demand response model: Real time pricing versus peak time rebate , 2015, 2015 North American Power Symposium (NAPS).

[15]  Clifford Grimm Evaluating Baselines for Demand Response Programs , 2008 .

[16]  Ailin Asadinejad,et al.  An investigation of the relationship between accuracy of customer baseline calculation and efficiency of Peak Time Rebate program , 2016, 2016 IEEE Power and Energy Conference at Illinois (PECI).

[17]  J. Rice Mathematical Statistics and Data Analysis , 1988 .