Immersed boundary-finite element model of fluid–structure interaction in the aortic root

It has long been recognized that aortic root elasticity helps to ensure efficient aortic valve closure, but our understanding of the functional importance of the elasticity and geometry of the aortic root continues to evolve as increasingly detailed in vivo imaging data become available. Herein, we describe a fluid–structure interaction model of the aortic root, including the aortic valve leaflets, the sinuses of Valsalva, the aortic annulus, and the sinotubular junction, that employs a version of Peskin’s immersed boundary (IB) method with a finite element description of the structural elasticity. As in earlier work, we use a fiber-based model of the valve leaflets, but this study extends earlier IB models of the aortic root by employing an incompressible hyperelastic model of the mechanics of the sinuses and ascending aorta using a constitutive law fit to experimental data from human aortic root tissue. In vivo pressure loading is accounted for by a backward displacement method that determines the unloaded configuration of the root model. Our model yields realistic cardiac output at physiological pressures, with low transvalvular pressure differences during forward flow, minimal regurgitation during valve closure, and realistic pressure loads when the valve is closed during diastole. Further, results from high-resolution computations indicate that although the detailed leaflet and root kinematics show some grid sensitivity, our IB model of the aortic root nonetheless produces essentially grid-converged flow rates and pressures at practical grid spacings for the high Reynolds number flows of the aortic root. These results thereby clarify minimum grid resolutions required by such models when used as stand-alone models of the aortic valve as well as when used to provide models of the outflow valves in models of left-ventricular fluid dynamics.

[1]  R. W. Eckstein,et al.  Systolic pressure gradients across the aortic valve and in the ascending aorta. , 1965, The American journal of physiology.

[2]  B. Bellhouse,et al.  Mechanism of Closure of the Aortic Valve , 1968, Nature.

[3]  C. Peskin Flow patterns around heart valves: A numerical method , 1972 .

[4]  W. M. Swanson,et al.  Dimensions and Geometric Relationships of the Human Aortic Value as a Function of Pressure , 1974, Circulation research.

[5]  N. Westerhof,et al.  Aortic Input Impedance in Normal Man: Relationship to Pressure Wave Forms , 1980, Circulation.

[6]  Aahj Fons Sauren The mechanical behaviour of the aortic valve , 1981 .

[7]  R. N. Vaishnav,et al.  ESTIMATION OF RESIDUAL STRAINS IN AORTIC SEGMENTS , 1983 .

[8]  M. Thubrikar The Aortic Valve , 1990 .

[9]  T. Schmitz-Rode,et al.  The geometry of the aortic root in health, at valve disease and after valve replacement. , 1990, Journal of biomechanics.

[10]  C. Peskin,et al.  Mechanical equilibrium determines the fractal fiber architecture of aortic heart valve leaflets. , 1994, The American journal of physiology.

[11]  C. Peskin,et al.  Fluid Dynamics of the Heart and its Valves , 1996 .

[12]  N. Stergiopulos,et al.  Residual strain effects on the stress field in a thick wall finite element model of the human carotid bifurcation. , 1996, Journal of biomechanics.

[13]  R. Gibbons,et al.  Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease Executive Summary A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease) , 1998 .

[14]  S. Govindjee,et al.  Computational methods for inverse de-formations in quasi-incompressible nite elasticity , 1998 .

[15]  W. Nichols,et al.  McDonald's Blood Flow in Arteries: Theoretical, Experimental and Clinical Principles , 1998 .

[16]  P. Dagum,et al.  Deformational dynamics of the aortic root: modes and physiologic determinants. , 1999, Circulation.

[17]  N. Stergiopulos,et al.  Total arterial inertance as the fourth element of the windkessel model. , 1999, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[18]  C. Peskin,et al.  A three-dimensional computer model of the human heart for studying cardiac fluid dynamics , 2000, SIGGRAPH 2000.

[19]  Joao A. C. Lima,et al.  Transesophageal magnetic resonance imaging of the aortic arch and descending thoracic aorta in patients with aortic atherosclerosis. , 2001, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[20]  C. Peskin,et al.  Modelling cardiac fluid dynamics and diastolic function , 2001, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[21]  C. Peskin,et al.  Heart Simulation by an Immersed Boundary Method with Formal Second-order Accuracy and Reduced Numerical Viscosity , 2001 .

[22]  C. Peskin,et al.  Simulation of a Flapping Flexible Filament in a Flowing Soap Film by the Immersed Boundary Method , 2002 .

[23]  C. Peskin The immersed boundary method , 2002, Acta Numerica.

[24]  E. Lansac,et al.  A four-dimensional study of the aortic root dynamics. , 2002, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[25]  D. Berdajs,et al.  The Anatomy of the Aortic Root , 2002 .

[26]  K. Hayashi Cardiovascular solid mechanics. Cells, tissues, and organs , 2003 .

[27]  Yongsam Kim,et al.  On various techniques for computer simulation of boundaries with mass , 2003 .

[28]  F P T Baaijens,et al.  A computational fluid-structure interaction analysis of a fiber-reinforced stentless aortic valve. , 2003, Journal of biomechanics.

[29]  Charles S. Peskin,et al.  Shared-Memory Parallel Vector Implementation of the Immersed Boundary Method for the Computation of Blood Flow in the Beating Mammalian Heart , 2004, The Journal of Supercomputing.

[30]  E. Savage,et al.  Aortic valve repair for aortic insufficiency in adults: a contemporary review and comparison with replacement techniques. , 2004, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[31]  K. J. Grande,et al.  Stress Variations in the Human Aortic Root and Valve: The Role of Anatomic Asymmetry , 1998, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[32]  J Vierendeels,et al.  Validation of a Fluid–Structure Interaction Model of a Heart Valve using the Dynamic Mesh Method in Fluent , 2004, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[33]  R. Cheng,et al.  Three-Dimensional Fluid-Structure Interaction Simulation of Bileaflet Mechanical Heart Valve Flow Dynamics , 2004, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[34]  Rosario V. Freeman,et al.  Spectrum of Calcific Aortic Valve Disease: Pathogenesis, Disease Progression, and Treatment Strategies , 2005, Circulation.

[35]  R. Ogden,et al.  Hyperelastic modelling of arterial layers with distributed collagen fibre orientations , 2006, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[36]  Y. C. Fung,et al.  What are the residual stresses doing in our blood vessels? , 2006, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[37]  Manuel Doblaré,et al.  Assessing the Use of the “Opening Angle Method” to Enforce Residual Stresses in Patient-Specific Arteries , 2007, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[38]  F. N. van de Vosse,et al.  Patient-specific initial wall stress in abdominal aortic aneurysms with a backward incremental method. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[39]  A. Yoganathan,et al.  Heart valve function: a biomechanical perspective , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[40]  Boyce E. Griffith,et al.  An adaptive, formally second order accurate version of the immersed boundary method , 2007, J. Comput. Phys..

[41]  P. Dagum,et al.  Aortic root dynamics and surgery: from craft to science , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[42]  Yongsam Kim,et al.  Penalty immersed boundary method for an elastic boundary with mass , 2007 .

[43]  M. L. Raghavan,et al.  Inverse elastostatic stress analysis in pre-deformed biological structures: Demonstration using abdominal aortic aneurysms. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[44]  C. Peskin,et al.  Implicit second-order immersed boundary methods with boundary mass , 2008 .

[45]  Fotis Sotiropoulos,et al.  Curvilinear immersed boundary method for simulating fluid structure interaction with complex 3D rigid bodies , 2008, J. Comput. Phys..

[46]  E. Tuzcu,et al.  Percutaneous treatment of aortic valve stenosis. , 2008, Cleveland Clinic journal of medicine.

[47]  E. Weinberg,et al.  A multiscale computational comparison of the bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valves in relation to calcific aortic stenosis. , 2008, Journal of biomechanics.

[48]  Boyce E. Griffith,et al.  Simulating the fluid dynamics of natural and prosthetic heart valves using the immersed boundary method , 2009 .

[49]  F. Yin,et al.  A hyperelastic constitutive law for aortic valve tissue. , 2009, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[50]  W A Wall,et al.  Prestressing in finite deformation abdominal aortic aneurysm simulation. , 2009, Journal of biomechanics.

[51]  Fotis Sotiropoulos,et al.  A review of state-of-the-art numerical methods for simulating flow through mechanical heart valves , 2009, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[52]  Boyce E. Griffith,et al.  Parallel and Adaptive Simulation of Cardiac Fluid Dynamics , 2009 .

[53]  J. Humphrey,et al.  Origin of axial prestretch and residual stress in arteries , 2009, Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology.

[54]  Boyce E. Griffith,et al.  An accurate and efficient method for the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations using the projection method as a preconditioner , 2009, J. Comput. Phys..

[55]  N. Stergiopulos,et al.  Comprar Snapshots Of Hemodynamics. An Aid For Clinical Research And Graduate Education | Nico Westerhof | 9781441963628 | Springer , 2010 .

[56]  Laura R. Croft,et al.  Computational Modeling of Aortic Heart Valves , 2010 .

[57]  L. Antiga,et al.  Comparative finite element model analysis of ascending aortic flow in bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valve. , 2010, Artificial organs.

[58]  A. Redaelli,et al.  Dynamic finite element analysis of the aortic root from MRI-derived parameters. , 2010, Medical engineering & physics.

[59]  Manuel Doblaré,et al.  Numerical framework for patient‐specific computational modelling of vascular tissue , 2010 .

[60]  A. Marsden,et al.  A comparison of outlet boundary treatments for prevention of backflow divergence with relevance to blood flow simulations , 2011 .

[61]  M. Sellier An iterative method for the inverse elasto-static problem , 2011 .

[62]  A. Quarteroni,et al.  Fluid―structure interaction simulation of aortic blood flow , 2011 .

[63]  Gil Marom,et al.  A fluid–structure interaction model of the aortic valve with coaptation and compliant aortic root , 2011, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[64]  J. Ekaterinaris,et al.  Coupled fluid-structure interaction hemodynamics in a zero-pressure state corrected arterial geometry. , 2011, Journal of biomechanics.

[65]  Boyce E. Griffith,et al.  Hybrid finite difference/finite element version of the immersed boundary method , 2012 .

[66]  C. Liang,et al.  Effect of bending rigidity in a dynamic model of a polyurethane prosthetic mitral valve , 2012, Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology.

[67]  Boyce E. Griffith,et al.  Immersed boundary model of aortic heart valve dynamics with physiological driving and loading conditions , 2012, International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering.

[68]  Boyce E. Griffith,et al.  Simulating an Elastic Ring with Bend and Twist by an Adaptive Generalized Immersed Boundary Method , 2012 .

[69]  G. Liu,et al.  Immersed smoothed finite element method for fluid–structure interaction simulation of aortic valves , 2012 .

[70]  Sebastian Vogt,et al.  IN VIVO DETERMINATION OF ELASTIC PROPERTIES OF THE HUMAN AORTA BASED ON 4D ULTRASOUND DATA , 2012 .

[71]  A. Azadani,et al.  Comparison of mechanical properties of human ascending aorta and aortic sinuses. , 2012, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[72]  D. Kelly,et al.  Patient Specific Computational Modeling in Cardiovascular Mechanics , 2012 .

[73]  Boyce E. Griffith,et al.  Image-based fluid-structure interaction model of the human mitral valve , 2013 .

[74]  Boyce E. Griffith,et al.  Efficient Variable-Coefficient Finite-Volume Stokes Solvers , 2013, 1308.4605.

[75]  Boyce E. Griffith,et al.  Immersed Boundary Method for Variable Viscosity and Variable Density Problems Using Fast Constant-Coefficient Linear Solvers I: Numerical Method and Results , 2013, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[76]  I. Borazjani Fluid–structure interaction, immersed boundary-finite element method simulations of bio-prosthetic heart valves , 2013 .

[77]  Joris Degroote,et al.  A computational method to assess the in vivo stresses and unloaded configuration of patient-specific blood vessels , 2013, J. Comput. Appl. Math..

[78]  Boyce E. Griffith,et al.  Quasi-static image-based immersed boundary-finite element model of left ventricle under diastolic loading , 2014, International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering.

[79]  Boyce E. Griffith,et al.  Immersed Boundary Method for Variable Viscosity and Variable Density Problems Using Fast Constant-Coefficient Linear Solvers II: Theory , 2014, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[80]  Luca Heltai,et al.  Benchmarking the immersed finite element method for fluid-structure interaction problems , 2013, Comput. Math. Appl..

[81]  Boyce E. Griffith,et al.  Geometric multigrid for an implicit-time immersed boundary method , 2013, Adv. Comput. Math..

[82]  L. Wurfel Mcdonald S Blood Flow In Arteries Theoretical Experimental And Clinical Principles , 2016 .

[83]  B. Westerhof,et al.  Snapshots of Hemodynamics: An Aid for Clinical Research and Graduate Education , 2018 .