Habitat assessment by parasitoids: consequences for population distribution

The ideal free distribution (IFD) is a stable distribution of competitors among resource patches. For equally efficient competitors, equilibrium is reached when the per capita rate of intake equalizes across patches. The seminal version of the IFD assumes omniscience, but populations may still converge toward the equilibrium provided that competitors 1) accurately assess their environment by learning and 2) remain for an optimal (rate-maximizing) time on each encountered patch. In the companion article (Tentelier C, Desouhant E, Fauvergue X. 2006. Habitat assessment by parasitoids: mechanisms for patch time allocation. Behav Ecol. Forthcoming), it is shown that the parasitoid wasp Lysiphlebus testaceipes adapts its exploitation of aphid host colonies based on previous experience, in a manner consistent with these two conditions. We therefore predicted that a randomly distributed population of initially naive wasps should converge toward the IFD. We tested this prediction by introducing 1300 L. testaceipes females into a 110-m-super-2 greenhouse containing 40 host patches. Just after introduction, the parasitoid rate of gain was positively affected by host number and negatively affected by parasitoid number but, as predicted, these effects vanished in the course of the experiment. Six hours after introduction, the expected rate of gain reached a constant. Surprisingly, this passage through equilibrium was not accompanied by a decrease in the coefficient of variation among gain rates or by a shift from a random to an aggregated distribution of parasitoids. These results challenge our understanding of the link between individual behavior and population distribution. Copyright 2006.

[1]  E. Desouhant,et al.  Habitat assessment by parasitoids: mechanisms for patch use behavior , 2006 .

[2]  E. Wajnberg,et al.  Genetic variation in the mechanisms of direct mutual interference in a parasitic wasp: consequences in terms of patch‐time allocation , 2004 .

[3]  E. Wajnberg,et al.  Olfactory response of two aphid parasitoids, Lysiphlebus testaceipes and Aphidius colemani, to aphid‐infested plants from a distance , 2004 .

[4]  T. Piersma,et al.  Phenotypic flexibility and the evolution of organismal design , 2003 .

[5]  Marten A Koops,et al.  Integrating the Roles of Information and Competitive Ability on the Spatial Distribution of Social Foragers , 2003, The American Naturalist.

[6]  J. Tumlinson,et al.  Quantitative relationships between induced jasmonic acid levels and volatile emission in Zea mays during Spodoptera exigua herbivory , 2003, Planta.

[7]  G. Beauchamp,et al.  Learning rules for social foragers: implications for the producer-scrounger game and ideal free distribution theory. , 2000, Journal of theoretical biology.

[8]  M. Sabelis,et al.  Nonequilibrium Population Dynamics of “Ideal and Free” Prey and Predators , 1999, The American Naturalist.

[9]  Pierre Auger,et al.  Predator Migration Decisions, the Ideal Free Distribution, and Predator‐Prey Dynamics , 1999, The American Naturalist.

[10]  G. Poppy,et al.  Identification of Semiochemicals Released During Aphid Feeding That Attract Parasitoid Aphidius ervi , 1998, Journal of Chemical Ecology.

[11]  T. P. Weber News from the realm of the ideal free distribution. , 1998, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[12]  Bruno J. Ens,et al.  Models of interference and their consequences for the spatial distribution of ideal and free predators , 1997 .

[13]  J. Meer The ideal free distribution when predators differ in competitive abilities , 1997 .

[14]  L. Giraldeau,et al.  Influence of Conspecific Attraction on the Spatial Distribution of Learning Foragers in a Patchy Habitat. , 1997 .

[15]  J. Rochat Delayed effects in aphid-parasitoid systems: Consequences for evaluating biological control species and their use in augmentation strategies , 1997, Entomophaga.

[16]  Vlastimil Krivan,et al.  Dynamic Ideal Free Distribution: Effects of Optimal Patch Choice on Predator-Prey Dynamics , 1997, The American Naturalist.

[17]  G. Parker,et al.  Interference and the ideal free distribution: oviposition in a parasitoid wasp , 1996 .

[18]  Markus Frischknecht,et al.  Predators choosing between patches with standing crop: the influence of switching rules and input types , 1996, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[19]  B. Peleg,et al.  Automata, matching and foraging behavior of bees , 1995 .

[20]  P. Kjellander,et al.  Ideal free distribution and natal dispersal in female roe deer , 1995, Oecologia.

[21]  C. M. Lessells Putting resource dynamics into continuous input ideal free distribution models , 1995, Animal Behaviour.

[22]  Michael J. Crawley,et al.  GLIM for Ecologists , 1994 .

[23]  M. J. Steenis,et al.  Intrinsic rate of increase of Lysiphlebus testaceipes Cresson (Hym.; Braconidae), a parasitoid of Aphis gossypii Glover (Hom., Aphididae) at different temperatures , 1994 .

[24]  R. Gray,et al.  Can ecological theory predict the distribution of foraging animals? A critical analysis of experiments on the ideal free distribution , 1993 .

[25]  T. Paine,et al.  Effect of experience on in‐flight orientation to host‐associated cues in the generalist parasitoid Lysiphlebus testaceipes , 1993 .

[26]  J. Krebs,et al.  Learning and Foraging: Individuals, Groups, and Populations , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[27]  D. Boos On Generalized Score Tests , 1992 .

[28]  G. A. Parker,et al.  The relationship between continuous input and interference models of ideal free distributions with unequal competitors , 1992, Animal Behaviour.

[29]  C Bernstein,et al.  The ideal free distribution and predator-prey populations. , 1992, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[30]  John R. Krebs,et al.  INDIVIDUAL DECISIONS AND THE DISTRIBUTION OF PREDATORS IN A PATCHY ENVIRONMENT. II. THE INFLUENCE OF TRAVEL COSTS AND STRUCTURE OF THE ENVIRONMENT , 1991 .

[31]  R. Arditi,et al.  Underestimation of mutual interference of predators , 1990, Oecologia.

[32]  J. Krebs,et al.  INDIVIDUAL DECISIONS AND THE DISTRIBUTION OF PREDATORS IN A PATCHY ENVIRONMENT , 1988 .

[33]  A. Kacelnik,et al.  Optimal foraging and arbitrary food distributions: Patch models gain a lease of life , 1988 .

[34]  Alasdair I. Houston,et al.  Learning rules, matching and frequency dependence , 1987 .

[35]  G. A. Parker,et al.  Ideal free distributions when individuals differ in competitive ability: phenotype-limited ideal free models , 1986, Animal Behaviour.

[36]  S. Zeger,et al.  Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models , 1986 .

[37]  A. Houston,et al.  Optimal foraging and learning , 1985 .

[38]  Klaus Regelmann,et al.  Competitive resource sharing: A simulation model , 1984, Animal Behaviour.

[39]  William J. Sutherland,et al.  Aggregation and the `ideal free ` distribution , 1983 .

[40]  C. Harley Learning the evolutionarily stable strategy. , 1981, Journal of theoretical biology.

[41]  D. Schuster,et al.  Response of Lysiphlebus testaceipes in an Olfactometer to a Host and a Non-host Insect and to Plants , 1974 .

[42]  M. Hassell,et al.  New Inductive Population Model for Insect Parasites and its Bearing on Biological Control , 1969, Nature.

[43]  S. Fretwell,et al.  On territorial behavior and other factors influencing habitat distribution in birds , 1969 .

[44]  Stefano,et al.  Lysiphlebus testaceipes on Aphis gossypii : studies on remote host discrimination , 2004 .

[45]  H. Hakoyama,et al.  The ideal free distribution when the resource is variable , 2003 .

[46]  K. Pike,et al.  Aphid parasitoids (Hymenoptera: Braconidae: Aphidiinae) of Northwest USA. , 2000 .

[47]  R. M. Austin,et al.  A simulation model of foraging behaviour and the effect of predation risk , 2000 .

[48]  E. Wajnberg,et al.  Genetic variation in patch time allocation in a parasitic wasp , 1999 .

[49]  K. Rose,et al.  Effects of Individual Habitat Selection in a Heterogeneous Environment on Fish Cohort Survivorship: A Modelling Analysis , 1997 .

[50]  Tom Tregenza,et al.  Building on the Ideal Free Distribution , 1995 .

[51]  N. Lester The "Feed:Feed" Decision: How Goldfish Solve the Patch Depletion Problem , 1984 .

[52]  J. Krebs,et al.  Behavioural ecology: An evolutionary approach , 1978 .