Flexible Representations of Dynamics Are Used in Object Manipulation

Summary To manipulate an object skillfully, the brain must learn its dynamics, specifying the mapping between applied force and motion. A fundamental issue in sensorimotor control is whether such dynamics are represented in an extrinsic frame of reference tied to the object or an intrinsic frame of reference linked to the arm. Although previous studies have suggested that objects are represented in arm-centered coordinates [1–6], all of these studies have used objects with unusual and complex dynamics. Thus, it is not known how objects with natural dynamics are represented. Here we show that objects with simple (or familiar) dynamics and those with complex (or unfamiliar) dynamics are represented in object- and arm-centered coordinates, respectively. We also show that objects with simple dynamics are represented with an intermediate coordinate frame when vision of the object is removed. These results indicate that object dynamics can be flexibly represented in different coordinate frames by the brain. We suggest that with experience, the representation of the dynamics of a manipulated object may shift from a coordinate frame tied to the arm toward one that is linked to the object. The additional complexity required to represent dynamics in object-centered coordinates would be economical for familiar objects because such a representation allows object use regardless of the orientation of the object in hand.

[1]  R. Johansson,et al.  Prediction Precedes Control in Motor Learning , 2003, Current Biology.

[2]  J. Massion.  Movement, posture and equilibrium: Interaction and coordination , 1992, Progress in Neurobiology.

[3]  D M Wolpert,et al.  Predicting the Consequences of Our Own Actions: The Role of Sensorimotor Context Estimation , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[4]  Reza Shadmehr,et al.  Learning of action through adaptive combination of motor primitives , 2000, Nature.

[5]  Mitsuo Kawato,et al.  Internal models for motor control and trajectory planning , 1999, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[6]  Stephen H. Scott,et al.  Overlap of internal models in motor cortex for mechanical loads during reaching , 2002, Nature.

[7]  R Shadmehr,et al.  Spatial Generalization from Learning Dynamics of Reaching Movements , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[8]  Daniel M Wolpert,et al.  Actions and Consequences in Bimanual Interaction Are Represented in Different Coordinate Systems , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[9]  R. Johansson,et al.  Coordinated isometric muscle commands adequately and erroneously programmed for the weight during lifting task with precision grip , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[10]  E. Bizzi,et al.  Consolidation in human motor memory , 1996, Nature.

[11]  David J Ostry,et al.  Transfer of Motor Learning across Arm Configurations , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[12]  M. Tanaka,et al.  Coding of modified body schema during tool use by macaque postcentral neurones. , 1996, Neuroreport.

[13]  J. Flanagan,et al.  Neural Correlates of Internal-Model Loading , 2006, Current Biology.

[14]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Motor prediction , 2001, Current Biology.

[15]  Christopher D Mah,et al.  Generalization of Object Manipulation Skills Learned without Limb Motion , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[16]  J R Flanagan,et al.  The Role of Internal Models in Motion Planning and Control: Evidence from Grip Force Adjustments during Movements of Hand-Held Loads , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[17]  M. Gazzaniga,et al.  The new cognitive neurosciences , 2000 .

[18]  Zoubin Ghahramani,et al.  Computational principles of movement neuroscience , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[19]  Konrad Paul Kording,et al.  A Neuroeconomics Approach to Inferring Utility Functions in Sensorimotor Control , 2004, PLoS biology.

[20]  Robert L. Sainburg,et al.  Spatial representations and internal models of limb dynamics in motor learning , 1999 .

[21]  E. Bizzi,et al.  Cortical correlates of learning in monkeys adapting to a new dynamical environment. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  Hiroshi Imamizu,et al.  Human cerebellar activity reflecting an acquired internal model of a new tool , 2000, Nature.

[23]  E. Bizzi,et al.  Neuronal Correlates of Motor Performance and Motor Learning in the Primary Motor Cortex of Monkeys Adapting to an External Force Field , 2001, Neuron.

[24]  F A Mussa-Ivaldi,et al.  Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of a motor task , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[25]  R. Ivry,et al.  Anticipatory adjustments in the unloading task: Is an efference copy necessary for learning? , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.