Blind Recovery of Sparse Signals From Subsampled Convolution

Subsampled blind deconvolution is the recovery of two unknown signals from samples of their convolution. To overcome the ill-posedness of this problem, solutions based on priors tailored to specific practical application have been developed. In particular, sparsity models have provided promising priors. However, in spite of the empirical success of these methods in many applications, existing analyses are rather limited in two main ways: by disparity between the theoretical assumptions on the signal and/or measurement model versus practical setups; or by failure to provide a performance guarantee for parameter values within the optimal regime defined by the information theoretic limits. In particular, it has been shown that a naive sparsity model is not a strong enough prior for identifiability in the blind deconvolution problem. Instead, in addition to sparsity, we adopt a conic constraint, which enforces spectral flatness of the signals. Under this prior together with random dictionary models, we show that the unknown sparse signals can be recovered from samples of their convolution at a rate scaling near optimally with the problem parameters. We also propose an iterative algorithm that is guaranteed to provide robust recovery at the same near optimal sample complexity provided that certain projection steps in the algorithm are successful. In our analysis, we have not verified the success of these projection steps, but these steps are inactive with high probability. Numerical results show the empirical performance of the iterative algorithm agrees with the performance guarantee.

[1]  Thomas Strohmer,et al.  Self-calibration and biconvex compressive sensing , 2015, ArXiv.

[2]  Yanjun Li,et al.  Identifiability in Blind Deconvolution under Minimal Assumptions , 2015, ArXiv.

[3]  Emmanuel J. Candès,et al.  The Power of Convex Relaxation: Near-Optimal Matrix Completion , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[4]  Yanjun Li,et al.  A Unified Framework for Identifiability Analysis in Bilinear Inverse Problems with Applications to Subspace and Sparsity Models , 2015, ArXiv.

[5]  E. Candès The restricted isometry property and its implications for compressed sensing , 2008 .

[6]  R. DeVore,et al.  A Simple Proof of the Restricted Isometry Property for Random Matrices , 2008 .

[7]  Yoram Bresler,et al.  Near Optimal Compressed Sensing of Sparse Rank-One Matrices via Sparse Power Factorization , 2013, ArXiv.

[8]  Subhasis Chaudhuri,et al.  Blind Image Deconvolution , 2014, Springer International Publishing.

[9]  Daniel D. Lee,et al.  Relevant deconvolution for acoustic source estimation , 2005, Proceedings. (ICASSP '05). IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 2005..

[10]  Jan Flusser,et al.  A Unified Approach to Superresolution and Multichannel Blind Deconvolution , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[11]  Sunav Choudhary,et al.  Identifiability Scaling Laws in Bilinear Inverse Problems , 2014, ArXiv.

[12]  Leslie Ying,et al.  Joint image reconstruction and sensitivity estimation in SENSE (JSENSE) , 2007, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[13]  Yanjun Li,et al.  Identifiability and Stability in Blind Deconvolution Under Minimal Assumptions , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[14]  Sunav Choudhary,et al.  Sparse blind deconvolution: What cannot be done , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory.

[15]  Yuejie Chi,et al.  Guaranteed Blind Sparse Spikes Deconvolution via Lifting and Convex Optimization , 2015, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing.

[16]  Peyman Milanfar,et al.  Blind Deconvolution Using Alternating Maximum a Posteriori Estimation with Heavy-Tailed Priors , 2013, CAIP.

[17]  Simon Foucart,et al.  Hard Thresholding Pursuit: An Algorithm for Compressive Sensing , 2011, SIAM J. Numer. Anal..

[18]  B. Recht,et al.  Convex Blind Deconvolution with Random Masks , 2014 .

[19]  Deanna Needell,et al.  CoSaMP: Iterative signal recovery from incomplete and inaccurate samples , 2008, ArXiv.

[20]  Emmanuel J. Candès,et al.  Decoding by linear programming , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[21]  Justin K. Romberg,et al.  Blind Deconvolution Using Convex Programming , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[22]  Yanjun Li,et al.  Identifiability in Blind Deconvolution With Subspace or Sparsity Constraints , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[23]  Kiryung Lee,et al.  RIP-like Properties in Subsampled Blind Deconvolution , 2015, ArXiv.

[24]  P. Wedin Perturbation bounds in connection with singular value decomposition , 1972 .

[25]  Karim Abed-Meraim,et al.  Blind system identification , 1997, Proc. IEEE.

[26]  M. Junge,et al.  Stability in blind deconvolution of sparse signals and reconstruction by alternating minimization , 2015, 2015 International Conference on Sampling Theory and Applications (SampTA).

[27]  Olgica Milenkovic,et al.  Subspace Pursuit for Compressive Sensing Signal Reconstruction , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[28]  Justin K. Romberg,et al.  Lifting for Blind Deconvolution in Random Mask Imaging: Identifiability and Convex Relaxation , 2015, SIAM J. Imaging Sci..

[29]  Yoram Bresler,et al.  Near-Optimal Compressed Sensing of a Class of Sparse Low-Rank Matrices Via Sparse Power Factorization , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[30]  Mauricio D. Sacchi,et al.  Sparse multichannel blind deconvolution , 2014 .