Towards disciplinary disintegration in biology

Interdisciplinary integration has fundamental limitations. This is not sufficiently realized in science and in philosophy. Concerning scientific theories there are many examples of pseudo-integration which should be unmasked by elementary philosophical analysis. For example, allegedly over-arching theories of stress which are meant to unite biology and psychology, upon analysis, turn out to represent terminological rather than substantive unity. They should be replaced by more specific, local theories. Theories of animal orientation, likewise, have been formulated in unduly general terms. A natural history approach is more suitable for the study of animal orientation. The tendency to formulate overgeneral theories is also present in evolutionary biology. Philosophy of biology can only deal with these matters if it takes a normative turn. Undue emphasis on interdisciplinary integration is a modern variant of the old unity of science ideal. The replacement of the ideal by a better one is an important challenge for the philosophy of science.

[1]  Mae-Wan Ho,et al.  Evolutionary Processes and Metaphors. , 1989 .

[2]  Wim J. van der Steen,et al.  Methodological Aspects of Migration and Orientation in Fishes , 1984 .

[3]  Mere generality is not enough , 1988 .

[4]  Imre Lakatos,et al.  The role of crucial experiments in science , 1974 .

[5]  William Bechtel,et al.  The Nature of Scientific Integration , 1986 .

[6]  W. V. D. Steen,et al.  Methodological problems in evolutionary biology IV. Stress and stress tolerance, an excercise in definitions , 1985 .

[7]  Kenneth F. Schaffner,et al.  Approaches to Reduction , 1967, Philosophy of Science.

[8]  David L. Hull,et al.  Science as a Process: An Evolutionary Account of the Social and Conceptual Development of Science, David L. Hull. 1988. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL. 608 pages. ISBN: 0-226-35060-4. $39.95 , 1989 .

[9]  P. Sloep,et al.  A natural alliance of teaching and philosophy of science , 1988 .

[10]  J. P. Grime,et al.  Plant Strategies and Vegetation Processes. , 1980 .

[11]  L. Darden.  Theory Change in Science: Strategies from Mendelian Genetics , 1991 .

[12]  P. Haccou,et al.  Methodological problems in evolutionary biology , 1992 .

[13]  W. Bechtel.  Integrating Scientific Disciplines , 1986 .

[14]  K. Schaffner.  Discovery and Explanation in Biology and Medicine , 1994 .

[15]  W. J. Steen.  Interdisciplinary integration in biology? An overview , 1990 .

[16]  P. Kitcher.  Explanatory unification and the causal structure of the world , 1989 .

[17]  Elliott Sober,et al.  The Nature of Selection , 1984 .

[18]  Willard Van Orman Quine,et al.  Word and Object , 1960 .

[19]  W. J. Steen,et al.  Theoretical studies on animal orientation I. Methodological appraisal of classifications , 1979 .

[20]  H. Kamminga,et al.  Laws and Natural History in Biology* , 1991, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[21]  R. Burian.  Challenges to the Evolutionary Synthesis , 1988 .

[22]  K. Schaffner.  Theory structure in the biomedical sciences. , 1980, Journal of Medicine and Philosophy.

[23]  Michael Ruse,et al.  Reduction in Genetics , 1974, PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association.

[24]  R. Levins.  Evolution in Changing Environments , 1968 .

[25]  Willard Van Orman Quine,et al.  From a Logical Point of View , 1955 .

[26]  David L. Hull,et al.  A mechanism and its metaphysics: An evolutionary account of the social and conceptual development of science , 1988 .

[27]  John H. Beatty,et al.  The Propensity Interpretation of Fitness , 1979, Philosophy of Science.

[28]  R. Lazarus.  Psychological stress and the coping process , 1970 .

[29]  A. Mikhail.  Stress: a psychophysiological conception. , 1981, Journal of human stress.

[30]  R. Levins.  The strategy of model building in population biology , 1966 .

[31]  Fitness and evolutionary explanation , 1991 .

[32]  R. Lazarus,et al.  Stress and coping: An anthology , 1977 .

[33]  William Bechtel,et al.  Integrating sciences by creating new disciplines: The case of cell biology , 1993 .

[34]  G. Arnold,et al.  RHEOTROPISM IN FISHES , 1974, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[35]  W. Bechtel,et al.  The evolution of our understanding of the cell: a study in the dynamics of scientific progress. , 1984, Studies in history and philosophy of science.

[36]  Wim J. van der Steen.  Concepts in biology: A survey of practical methodological principles , 1990 .

[37]  G. Fraenkel.  Orientation of Animals , 1940 .