Diffusion-weighted imaging of breast cancer with the sensitivity encoding technique: analysis of the apparent diffusion coefficient value.

PURPOSE The usefulness of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in the field of neuroradiology has been established. Despite its high contrast resolution, DWI has the disadvantages of susceptibility artifact and chemical shift artifact. We performed DWI of breast cancer with the sensitivity encoding (SENSE) technique. METHODS The subjects were 60 female patients with breast mass. All patients underwent MRI including SENSE-DWI and were diagnosed histologically. Of these patients, 55 were diagnosed with breast cancer and the remaining five were diagnosed with benign mass. The histological diagnoses of breast cancer were as follows: 39 cases of invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC); 11 cases of IDC with a predominant intraductal component and non IDC (pure or predominant NIDC); and five cases of special types of cancer. The MR system used was a Gyroscan Intera 1.5T (Philips Medical Systems). In addition to routine MRI for breast cancer, including contrast-enhanced dynamic, SENSE-DWI was obtained. The accuracy of the positional information of SENSE-DWI was visually compared with that of conventional images. The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of breast mass were analyzed with SENSE-DWI. RESULTS The accuracy of positional information was adequate for diagnosing of all patients. The mean ADC value of breast cancer was 1.021x10(-3) mm2/s and that of benign mass was 1.488x10(-3) mm2/s (p=0.0002). The mean ADC value of IDC was 0.968x10(-3) mm2/s and that of pure or predominant NIDC was 1.218x10(-3) mm2/s (p=0.0011). CONCLUSION SENSE-DWI was of sufficient quality to support diagnosis of breast mass. SENSE-DWI may permit the acquisition of more detailed information about lesions, including tumor cellularity, that is difficult to obtain with conventional techniques.

[1]  S. Date [Diagnosis of intraductal spread of breast cancer by high-resolution MR imaging: correlation between MR imaging and pathohistological findings]. , 1998, Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai zasshi. Nippon acta radiologica.

[2]  P. Basser,et al.  In vivo fiber tractography using DT‐MRI data , 2000, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[3]  Stephen E. Jones Implications of the NIH Consensus Development Conference on the Treatment of Early-Stage Breast Cancer , 1991 .

[4]  P. Boesiger,et al.  SENSE: Sensitivity encoding for fast MRI , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[5]  Anna L. Brown,et al.  Effect of preoperative chemotherapy on the outcome of women with operable breast cancer. , 1998, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[6]  R. Turner,et al.  Echo-planar imaging: magnetic resonance imaging in a fraction of a second. , 1991, Science.

[7]  Naobumi Yashiro,et al.  Diffusion-Weighted Half-Fourier Single-Shot Turbo Spin Echo Imaging in Breast Tumors: Differentiation of Invasive Ductal Carcinoma from Fibroadenoma , 2002, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[8]  H. Kawashima [Fat suppressed dynamic MR imaging of breast cancer: radiologic-pathologic correlation]. , 1996, Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai zasshi. Nippon acta radiologica.

[9]  Yasuyuki Yamashita,et al.  Invited. Ultrafast MR imaging of the abdomen: Echo planar imaging and diffusion‐weighted imaging , 1998, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[10]  Shigeru Nawano,et al.  Efficacy of MR mammography (MRM) in providing preoperative locoregional information on breast cancer: correlation between MRM and histological findings. , 2002, Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

[11]  W. P. Evans,et al.  Three-dimensional RODEO breast MR imaging of lesions containing ductal carcinoma in situ. , 1996, Radiology.

[12]  S E Harms,et al.  MR imaging of the breast with rotating delivery of excitation off resonance: clinical experience with pathologic correlation. , 1993, Radiology.

[13]  Yasuo Nakajima,et al.  Coil sensitivity encoding in MR imaging: advantages and disadvantages in clinical practice. , 2002, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[14]  Toshinori Hirai,et al.  Usefulness of diffusion‐weighted MRI with echo‐planar technique in the evaluation of cellularity in gliomas , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[15]  J K Smith,et al.  Apparent diffusion coefficients in the evaluation of high-grade cerebral gliomas. , 2001, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[16]  Rachel Brem,et al.  Diffusion imaging of human breast , 1997, NMR in biomedicine.

[17]  L. Schwartz,et al.  MR imaging of the breast in patients with occult primary breast carcinoma. , 1997, Radiology.

[18]  K. Enomoto,et al.  The role of contrast-enhanced high resolution MRI in the surgical planning of breast cancer , 1997, Breast cancer.

[19]  H Mumtaz,et al.  Staging of symptomatic primary breast cancer with MR imaging. , 1997, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[20]  R. Gillies,et al.  Early increases in breast tumor xenograft water mobility in response to paclitaxel therapy detected by non-invasive diffusion magnetic resonance imaging. , 1999, Neoplasia.

[21]  R. J. Ross,et al.  Nuclear magnetic resonance imaging and evaluation of human breast tissue: preliminary clinical trials. , 1982, Radiology.

[22]  J H Simon,et al.  Gadopentetate dimeglumine-enhanced chemical-shift MR imaging of the breast. , 1991, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[23]  Usha Sinha,et al.  Functional Magnetic Resonance of Human Breast Tumors , 2002 .

[24]  S J Schnitt,et al.  The optimal extent of resection for patients with stages I or II breast cancer treated with conservative surgery and radiotherapy. , 1991, Annals of surgery.

[25]  T. Ichikawa,et al.  Diffusion-weighted MR imaging with single-shot echo-planar imaging in the upper abdomen: preliminary clinical experience in 61 patients , 1999, Abdominal Imaging.

[26]  C T Moonen,et al.  Diffusion tensor MRI of the human kidney , 2001, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[27]  P. Bottomley,et al.  An analytical SMASH procedure (ASP) for sensitivity‐encoded MRI , 2000, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[28]  Vincent Schmithorst,et al.  Simultaneous correction of ghost and geometric distortion artifacts in EPI using a multiecho reference scan , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[29]  À. Rovira,et al.  Diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the acute phase of transient ischemic attacks. , 2002, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[30]  J. Pekar,et al.  Echo-planar imaging of intravoxel incoherent motion. , 1990, Radiology.

[31]  R. Stollberger,et al.  Improved diffusion‐weighted single‐shot echo‐planar imaging (EPI) in stroke using sensitivity encoding (SENSE) , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.