Influence of peak measurement parameters on the quality of chiral electrophoretic separations

The effect of nine peak measurement/analysis parameters on chiral capillary electrophoresis (CE), followed by UV detection, was studied. The parameters pertained UV‐detection (detection wavelength, reference wavelength, and wavelength bandwidths), signal processing (data acquisition rate, type and amount of filtering) and peak detection (detection threshold and peak width). The influence of these factors on the chiral separation of dimethindene enantiomers was studied at two different concentrations (i.e., at high and low signal‐to‐noise (S/N) ratio) by the means of experimental designs. The electropherogram characteristics considered were the resolution between the two enantiomers, the peak areas, and the S/N ratio. A D‐optimal design was first used as screening design to identify the most critical parameters. Afterwards, a modelling of the different responses as a function of these critical parameters was performed based on the results of a face‐centered central composite design. The results showed that the signal‐processing parameters should be carefully selected when developing a CE separation since very important variations in the separation, the S/N ratio and the peak area of the substances can occur by setting these parameters at different levels. The detection wavelength should also be carefully chosen for optimal peak area measurement. The role of these parameters becomes more important with decreasing concentration of the analytes (i.e., low S/N ratio). This study showed that the peak measurement/analysis parameters should be optimized as the chemical and physical parameters of a method. They also should always be well specified in order to allow a good transfer of a method from one instrument to another.

[1]  P. Laguna,et al.  Signal Processing , 2002, Yearbook of Medical Informatics.

[2]  K. Altria Capillary Electrophoresis Guidebook , 1995 .

[3]  Thomas W. Parsons,et al.  Digital signal processing: theory, applications, and hardware , 1991 .

[4]  P.K. Rajan,et al.  Two-dimensional digital signal processing II: Transforms and median filters , 1982, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[5]  T. Paine,et al.  Technical information. , 1972, Science.

[6]  Stephen A. Dyer,et al.  Digital signal processing , 2018, 8th International Multitopic Conference, 2004. Proceedings of INMIC 2004..

[7]  Ronald W. Schafer,et al.  Two-dimensional digital signal processing , 1976 .