Assessing Spatial Synergy Between Integrated Urban Rail Transit System and Urban Form: A BULI-Based MCLSGA Model With the Wisdom of Crowds

Spatially synergizing the urban rail transit (URT) network integrated with its feeder transit system and the urban form plays an important role in improving the effectiveness of URT in mitigating traffic congestion, reducing air pollution, optimizing urban spatial structure, etc. This article mainly focuses on assessing the spatial synergy between the two parts by specifying the assessment criteria that can effectively characterize the spatial synergic mechanism between the two parts and developing a novel multicriteria large-scale group assessment (MCLSGA) model, in which basic uncertain linguistic information (BULI), as an extended form of fuzzy linguistic approach, is used to model and process the subjective assessment information (Assess-Inf) elicited by experts. In order to alleviate the computing complexity, an agglomerative hierarchical clustering algorithm is introduced to cluster the Assess-Inf given by a huge number of experts as per the organizers’ expected discrimination level on reliability-related Assess-Inf. A method for weighting the clusters is then proposed to control the roles played by the items of the Assess-Inf, representing each cluster and having different reliability levels in their fusing process to tap into wisdom of crowds (WOC) while accommodating the organizers’ trust level in the reliability-related Assess-Inf given by experts. Afterward, the best–worst method is extended to the BULI-based large-scale group assessment context with the aim of accurately weighting the criteria by drawing on WOC. Finally, a case study on assessing the spatial synergy between Chongqing’s integrated URT system and urban form is conducted to validate the validity of the proposed MCLSGA model.

[1]  R. Mesiar,et al.  Relative Basic Uncertain Information in Preference and Uncertain Involved Information Fusion , 2022, International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems.

[2]  Muhammet Deveci,et al.  An interval type-2 fuzzy sets based Delphi approach to evaluate site selection indicators of sustainable vehicle shredding facilities , 2022, Appl. Soft Comput..

[3]  Harish Garg,et al.  Novel distance measures for intuitionistic fuzzy sets based on various triangle centers of isosceles triangular fuzzy numbers and their applications , 2021, Expert Syst. Appl..

[4]  Madjid Tavana,et al.  A fuzzy weighted influence non-linear gauge system with application to advanced technology assessment at NASA , 2021, Expert Syst. Appl..

[5]  X. Huo,et al.  Sustainable Development of Urban Metro System: Perspective of Coordination between Supply and Demand , 2021, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[6]  Witold Pedrycz,et al.  Sustainable building material selection: An integrated multi-criteria large group decision making framework , 2021, Appl. Soft Comput..

[7]  Robert Ivor John,et al.  Offshore wind farm site selection using interval rough numbers based Best-Worst Method and MARCOS , 2021, Appl. Soft Comput..

[8]  Xianhui Hou,et al.  Examining the Spatial Coordination between Metrorail Accessibility and Urban Spatial Form in the Context of Big Data , 2021, Land.

[9]  D. Pamučar,et al.  Assessment of alternative fuel vehicles for sustainable road transportation of United States using integrated fuzzy FUCOM and neutrosophic fuzzy MARCOS methodology. , 2021, The Science of the total environment.

[10]  Luis Martínez,et al.  An optimal Best-Worst prioritization method under a 2-tuple linguistic environment in decision making , 2021, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[11]  Miroslaw J. Skibniewski,et al.  Online-review analysis based large-scale group decision-making for determining passenger demands and evaluating passenger satisfaction: Case study of high-speed rail system in China , 2021, Inf. Fusion.

[12]  Ilgin Gokasar,et al.  Fuzzy Power Heronian function based CoCoSo method for the advantage prioritization of autonomous vehicles in real-time traffic management , 2021 .

[13]  Dragan Pamucar,et al.  A new intelligent MCDM model for HCW management: The integrated BWM-MABAC model based on D numbers , 2021, Expert Syst. Appl..

[14]  Ronald R. Yager,et al.  An Uncertain and Preference Evaluation Model with Basic Uncertain Information in Educational Management , 2020, Int. J. Comput. Intell. Syst..

[15]  Weiwei Liu,et al.  Evaluation of coupling coordination degree between urban rail transit and land use , 2019, Int. J. Commun. Syst..

[16]  Yasuo Asakura,et al.  Coordination between node, place, and ridership: Comparing three transit operators in Tokyo , 2020 .

[17]  Huayou Chen,et al.  Basic uncertain information soft set and its application to multi-criteria group decision making , 2020, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell..

[18]  Roman Słowiński,et al.  How to support the application of multiple criteria decision analysis? Let us start with a comprehensive taxonomy , 2020, Omega.

[19]  Devarshi Chaurasia,et al.  Urban sustainability assessment: The evaluation of coordinated relationship between BRTS and land use in transit-oriented development mode using DEA model , 2020 .

[20]  Xuan Zhang,et al.  Bid Evaluation for Major Construction Projects Under Large-Scale Group Decision-Making Environment and Characterized Expertise Levels , 2020, Int. J. Comput. Intell. Syst..

[21]  Enrique Herrera-Viedma,et al.  Large-Scale decision-making: Characterization, taxonomy, challenges and future directions from an Artificial Intelligence and applications perspective , 2020, Inf. Fusion.

[22]  Luis Martínez-López,et al.  A Cost Consensus Metric for Consensus Reaching Processes based on a comprehensive minimum cost model , 2020, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[23]  Liang Wang,et al.  Fuzzy TODIM method based on alpha-level sets , 2020, Expert Syst. Appl..

[24]  Shushan Chai,et al.  Design of Urban Rail Transit Network Constrained by Urban Road Network, Trips and Land-Use Characteristics , 2019, Sustainability.

[25]  Ming Tang,et al.  From conventional group decision making to large-scale group decision making: What are the challenges and how to meet them in big data era? A state-of-the-art survey , 2019 .

[26]  Luis Martínez-López,et al.  Sustainable building material selection: A QFD- and ELECTRE III-embedded hybrid MCGDM approach with consensus building , 2019, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell..

[27]  Huchang Liao,et al.  The state-of-the-art survey on integrations and applications of the best worst method in decision making: Why, what, what for and what's next? , 2019, Omega.

[28]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  Sparse Representation-Based Intuitionistic Fuzzy Clustering Approach to Find the Group Intra-Relations and Group Leaders for Large-Scale Decision Making , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[29]  Aleksander Król,et al.  The Design of a Metro Network Using a Genetic Algorithm , 2019, Applied Sciences.

[30]  Guy De Tré,et al.  A large scale consensus reaching process managing group hesitation , 2018, Knowl. Based Syst..

[31]  E. Guerra,et al.  Urban form, transit supply, and travel behavior in Latin America: Evidence from Mexico's 100 largest urban areas , 2018, Transport Policy.

[32]  Georges Darido,et al.  The Urban Rail Development Handbook , 2018 .

[33]  Surajit Borkotokey,et al.  Aggregation Under Uncertainty , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[34]  Surajit Borkotokey,et al.  Certainty aggregation and the certainty fuzzy measures , 2018, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[35]  H. Kato,et al.  What led to the establishment of a rail-oriented city? Determinants of urban rail supply in Tokyo, Japan, 1950–2010 , 2017 .

[36]  Zhen Zhang,et al.  Managing Multigranular Linguistic Distribution Assessments in Large-Scale Multiattribute Group Decision Making , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems.

[37]  Shengxiao Li,et al.  Bicycle-metro integration in a growing city: The determinants of cycling as a transfer mode in metro station areas in Beijing , 2017 .

[38]  Yan Song,et al.  Rail Transportation Lead Urban Form Change: A Case Study of Beijing , 2017 .

[39]  B. Han,et al.  Urban Rail Transit in China: Progress Report and Analysis (2008–2015) , 2016 .

[40]  Jiawen Yang,et al.  Density-oriented versus development-oriented transit investment: Decoding metro station location selection in Shenzhen , 2016 .

[41]  J. Rezaei Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method: Some properties and a linear model , 2016 .

[42]  Yi Yang,et al.  Proportional hesitant fuzzy linguistic term set for multiple criteria group decision making , 2016, Inf. Sci..

[43]  J. Zacharias,et al.  How do metro stations integrate with walking environments? Results from walking access within three types of built environment in Beijing , 2016 .

[44]  Luis Martínez-López,et al.  An Overview on Fuzzy Modelling of Complex Linguistic Preferences in Decision Making , 2016, Int. J. Comput. Intell. Syst..

[45]  Adil Baykasoglu,et al.  An analysis of DEMATEL approaches for criteria interaction handling within ANP , 2016, Expert Syst. Appl..

[46]  Abbas S. Milani,et al.  On the effect of subjective, objective and combinative weighting in multiple criteria decision making: A case study on impact optimization of composites , 2016, Expert Syst. Appl..

[47]  Zhibin Wu,et al.  Possibility Distribution-Based Approach for MAGDM With Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Information , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics.

[48]  Y. Pei,et al.  Model for Estimation Urban Transportation Supply-Demand Ratio , 2015 .

[49]  J. Rezaei Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method , 2015 .

[50]  Eva Chen,et al.  Identifying Expertise to Extract the Wisdom of Crowds , 2015, Manag. Sci..

[51]  Lei Mao,et al.  Coordination between subway and urban space: A networked approach , 2014 .

[52]  Christopher D. Higgins,et al.  Light Rail and Land Use Change: Rail Transit’s Role in Reshaping and Revitalizing Cities , 2014 .

[53]  Yin-Feng Xu,et al.  Consistency and consensus measures for linguistic preference relations based on distribution assessments , 2014, Inf. Fusion.

[54]  Yang Sun,et al.  Joint Optimization of a Rail Transit Route and Bus Routes in a Transit Corridor , 2013 .

[55]  Paul Batty,et al.  Sustainable urban rail systems: strategies and technologies for optimal management of regenerative braking energy , 2013 .

[56]  Chuan Ding,et al.  An Evaluation on Coordinated Relationship between Urban Rail Transit and Land-use under TOD Mode , 2013 .

[57]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Term Sets for Decision Making , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[58]  Jose Manuel Vassallo,et al.  Transportation Infrastructure Impacts on Firm Location: The Effect of a New Metro Line in the Suburbs of Madrid , 2012 .

[59]  Kevin J. Krizek,et al.  Assessing Options to Enhance Bicycle and Transit Integration , 2011 .

[60]  David A. King Developing Densely: Estimating the Effect of Subway Growth on New York City Land Uses , 2011 .

[61]  E. Feitelson,et al.  Light rail routing: do goals matter? , 2011 .

[62]  Agachai Sumalee,et al.  Design of a Rail Transit Line for Profit Maximization in a Linear Transportation Corridor , 2011 .

[63]  Piet Rietveld,et al.  The Impact of Railway Stations on Residential and Commercial Property Value: A Meta-analysis , 2003 .

[64]  David M Levinson,et al.  Density and Dispersion: The Co-Development of Land Use and Rail in London , 2007 .

[65]  A. Chatterjee,et al.  TRAVEL DEMAND FORECASTING FOR URBAN TRANSPORTATION PLANNING by , 2007 .

[66]  Jianhong Wu,et al.  Data clustering - theory, algorithms, and applications , 2007 .

[67]  Roger Gorham,et al.  Sustainable urban transport: Four innovative directions , 2006 .

[68]  Ashish Verma,et al.  Feeder Bus Routes Generation within Integrated Mass Transit Planning Framework , 2005 .

[69]  Ashish Verma,et al.  Optimal urban rail transit corridor identification within integrated framework using geographical information system , 2005 .

[70]  M. Kuby,et al.  Factors influencing light-rail station boardings in the United States , 2004 .

[71]  Roger Mackett,et al.  NEW URBAN RAIL SYSTEMS: A POLICY-BASED TECHNIQUE TO MAKE THEM MORE SUCCESSFUL. , 2003 .

[72]  Piotr Olszewski,et al.  INTEGRATED PUBLIC TRANSPORT IN SINGAPORE AND HONG KONG. , 2003 .

[73]  Ela Babalik-Sutcliffe,et al.  Urban rail systems: Analysis of the factors behind success , 2002 .

[74]  Jonathan E. D. Richmond,et al.  A whole-system approach to evaluating urban transit investments , 2001 .

[75]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  A 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic representation model for computing with words , 2000, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst..

[76]  Ela Babalik,et al.  Urban rail systems : a planning framework to increase their success , 2000 .

[77]  Paul Schonfeld,et al.  JOINT OPTIMIZATION OF A RAIL TRANSIT LINE AND ITS FEEDER BUS SYSTEM , 1998 .

[78]  S. O’sullivan,et al.  Walking Distances to and from Light-Rail Transit Stations , 1996 .

[79]  José L. Verdegay,et al.  On aggregation operations of linguistic labels , 1993, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[80]  D. Pickrell A Desire Named Streetcar Fantasy and Fact in Rail Transit Planning , 1992 .

[81]  Fred Glick,et al.  LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT AND EFFECTIVE LAND USE PLANNING: PORTLAND, SACRAMENTO, AND SAN DIEGO , 1992 .

[82]  Ronald R. Yager,et al.  On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multicriteria decision-making , 1988 .

[83]  George J. Klir,et al.  Fuzzy sets, uncertainty and information , 1988 .

[84]  J. Gómez-Ibáňez A DARK SIDE TO LIGHT RAIL? THE EXPERIENCE OF THREE NEW TRANSIT SYSTEMS , 1985 .

[85]  L. A. ZADEH,et al.  The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning - I , 1975, Inf. Sci..