Rethinking Centrality: The Role of Dynamical Processes in Social Network Analysis

Many popular measures used in social network analysis, including centrality, are based on the random walk. The random walk is a model of a stochastic process where a node interacts with one other node at a time. However, the random walk may not be appropriate for modeling social phenomena, including epidemics and information diffusion, in which one node may interact with many others at the same time, for example, by broadcasting the virus or information to its neighbors. To produce meaningful results, social network analysis algorithms have to take into account the nature of interactions between the nodes. In this paper we classify dynamical processes as conservative and non-conservative and relate them to well-known measures of centrality used in network analysis: PageRank and Alpha-Centrality. We demonstrate, by ranking users in online social networks used for broadcasting information, that non-conservative Alpha-Centrality generally leads to a better agreement with an empirical ranking scheme than the conservative PageRank.

[1]  P. Bonacich.  Power and Centrality: A Family of Measures , 1987, American Journal of Sociology.

[2]  Christos Faloutsos,et al.  Epidemic spreading in real networks: an eigenvalue viewpoint , 2003, 22nd International Symposium on Reliable Distributed Systems, 2003. Proceedings..

[3]  Tad Hogg,et al.  Social dynamics of Digg , 2010, EPJ Data Science.

[4]  P. Lazarsfeld,et al.  Personal Influence: The Part Played by People in the Flow of Mass Communications , 1956 .

[5]  Kristina Lerman,et al.  Entropy-based Classification of 'Retweeting' Activity on Twitter , 2011, ArXiv.

[6]  P. Lazarsfeld,et al.  Personal Influence: The Part Played by People in the Flow of Mass Communications , 1956 .

[7]  K. Dietz.  The estimation of the basic reproduction number for infectious diseases , 1993, Statistical methods in medical research.

[8]  Jacob Goldenberg,et al.  Talk of the Network: A Complex Systems Look at the Underlying Process of Word-of-Mouth , 2001 .

[9]  Esteban Moro,et al.  Impact of human activity patterns on the dynamics of information diffusion. , 2009, Physical review letters.

[10]  Tad Hogg,et al.  Stochastic Models of User-Contributory Web Sites , 2009, ICWSM.

[11]  Michalis Faloutsos,et al.  Threshold conditions for arbitrary cascade models on arbitrary networks , 2011, 2011 IEEE 11th International Conference on Data Mining.

[12]  Jennifer Widom,et al.  Scaling personalized web search , 2003, WWW '03.

[13]  M. Macy,et al.  Complex Contagions and the Weakness of Long Ties1 , 2007, American Journal of Sociology.

[14]  Alexander Grey,et al.  The Mathematical Theory of Infectious Diseases and Its Applications , 1977 .

[15]  Martin G. Everett,et al.  A Graph-theoretic perspective on centrality , 2006, Soc. Networks.

[16]  Michele Benzi,et al.  The Physics of Communicability in Complex Networks , 2011, ArXiv.

[17]  N. Ling.  The Mathematical Theory of Infectious Diseases and its applications , 1978 .

[18]  Michael Trusov,et al.  Determining Influential Users in Internet Social Networks , 2010 .

[19]  Alessandro Vespignani,et al.  Epidemic spreading in scale-free networks. , 2000, Physical review letters.

[20]  Herbert W. Hethcote,et al.  The Mathematics of Infectious Diseases , 2000, SIAM Rev..

[21]  Jean-Charles Delvenne,et al.  Flow graphs: interweaving dynamics and structure , 2010, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[22]  D. Vere-Jones.  Markov Chains , 1972, Nature.

[23]  G. G. Stokes.  "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[24]  Martin Bichler,et al.  Identification of influencers - Measuring influence in customer networks , 2008, Decis. Support Syst..

[25]  L. Bettencourt,et al.  The power of a good idea: Quantitative modeling of the spread of ideas from epidemiological models , 2005, physics/0502067.

[26]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Everyone's an influencer: quantifying influence on twitter , 2011, WSDM '11.

[27]  P. Bonacich.  Factoring and weighting approaches to status scores and clique identification , 1972 .

[28]  Kristina Lerman,et al.  What Stops Social Epidemics? , 2011, ICWSM.

[29]  Jon Kleinberg,et al.  Maximizing the spread of influence through a social network , 2003, KDD '03.

[30]  Leonard M. Freeman,et al.  A set of measures of centrality based upon betweenness , 1977 .

[31]  Tad Hogg,et al.  Using Stochastic Models to Describe and Predict Social Dynamics of Web Users , 2010, TIST.

[32]  Haewoon Kwak,et al.  Finding influentials based on the temporal order of information adoption in twitter , 2010, WWW '10.

[33]  Rajeev Motwani,et al.  The PageRank Citation Ranking : Bringing Order to the Web , 1999, WWW 1999.

[34]  Kristina Lerman,et al.  Information Contagion: An Empirical Study of the Spread of News on Digg and Twitter Social Networks , 2010, ICWSM.

[35]  Kristina Lerman,et al.  A framework for quantitative analysis of cascades on networks , 2010, WSDM '11.

[36]  Phillip Bonacich,et al.  Eigenvector-like measures of centrality for asymmetric relations , 2001, Soc. Networks.

[37]  Peter H. Reingen,et al.  Social Ties and Word-of-Mouth Referral Behavior , 1987 .

[38]  Stephen P. Borgatti,et al.  Centrality and network flow , 2005, Soc. Networks.

[39]  Sebastiano Vigna,et al.  PageRank as a function of the damping factor , 2005, WWW '05.

[40]  Daniel G. Goldstein,et al.  The structure of online diffusion networks , 2012, EC '12.

[41]  P. Kaye.  Infectious diseases of humans: Dynamics and control , 1993 .

[42]  R. Lambiotte,et al.  Random Walks, Markov Processes and the Multiscale Modular Organization of Complex Networks , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering.

[43]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of Innovations, 5th Edition , 2003 .

[44]  Daniel M. Romero,et al.  Influence and passivity in social media , 2010, ECML/PKDD.

[45]  D. Watts,et al.  Influentials, Networks, and Public Opinion Formation , 2007 .

[46]  Santo Fortunato,et al.  Random Walks on Directed Networks: the Case of PageRank , 2007, Int. J. Bifurc. Chaos.

[47]  Kristina Lerman,et al.  Predicting Influential Users in Online Social Networks , 2010, ArXiv.

[48]  Krishna P. Gummadi,et al.  Measuring User Influence in Twitter: The Million Follower Fallacy , 2010, ICWSM.

[49]  Samuel Kotz,et al.  Advances in Urn Models during the Past Two Decades , 1997 .

[50]  David F. Gleich,et al.  Tracking the random surfer: empirically measured teleportation parameters in PageRank , 2010, WWW '10.

[51]  Leo Katz,et al.  A new status index derived from sociometric analysis , 1953 .

[52]  Alessandro Vespignani,et al.  Dynamical Processes on Complex Networks , 2008 .

[53]  Kristina Lerman,et al.  A Parameterized Centrality Metric for Network Analysis , 2010, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[54]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[55]  Christos Faloutsos,et al.  Fast Random Walk with Restart and Its Applications , 2006, Sixth International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM'06).

[56]  Kristina Lerman,et al.  The Simple Rules of Social Contagion , 2013, Scientific Reports.