Validation of Roche immunoassay for severe acute respiratory coronavirus 2 in South Africa

Background: Serology testing is an important ancillary diagnostic to the reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). We aimed to evaluate the performance of the Roche Elecsys™ chemiluminescent immunoassay (Rotkreuz, Switzerland), that detects antibodies against the SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid antigen, at an academic laboratory in South Africa. Methods: Serum samples were collected from 312 donors with confirmed positive SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR tests, with approval from a large university’s human research ethics committee. Negative controls included samples stored prior to December 2019 and from patients who tested negative for SARS-CoV-2 on RT-PCR and were confirmed negative using multiple serology methods ( n = 124). Samples were stored at –80 °C and analysed on a Roche cobas™ 602 autoanalyser. Results: Compared with RT-PCR, our evaluation revealed a specificity of 100% and overall sensitivity of 65.1%. The sensitivity in individuals > 14 days’ post-diagnosis was 72.6%, with the highest sensitivity 31–50 days’ post-diagnosis at 88.6%. Results were also compared with in-house serology tests that showed high agreement in majority of categories. Conclusions: The sensitivity at all-time points post-diagnosis was lower than reported in other studies, but sensitivity in appropriate cohorts approached 90% with a high specificity. The lower sensitivity at earlier time points or in individuals without symptomatology may indicate failure to produce antibodies, which was further supported by the comparison against in-house serology tests.

[1]  D. Moher,et al.  Mandatory disclosure of financial interests of journals and editors , 2020, BMJ.

[2]  Vineet D. Menachery,et al.  Quantitative SARS-CoV-2 Serology in Children With Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome (MIS-C) , 2020, Pediatrics.

[3]  A. Gylfason,et al.  Humoral Immune Response to SARS-CoV-2 in Iceland , 2020, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  Xander M R van Wijk,et al.  Analytical and Clinical Evaluation of the Automated Elecsys Anti–SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Assay on the Roche cobas e602 Analyzer , 2020, American journal of clinical pathology.

[5]  J. Blackburn,et al.  SARS-CoV-2 Antigens Expressed in Plants Detect Antibody Responses in COVID-19 Patients , 2020, Frontiers in Plant Science.

[6]  S. Peter,et al.  Evaluation of three fully-automated SARS-CoV-2 antibody assays , 2020, Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine.

[7]  T. Aw,et al.  Evaluation of an electrochemiluminescent SARS-CoV-2 antibody assay , 2020, The journal of applied laboratory medicine.

[8]  H. Rees,et al.  The role of serological testing in the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak. , 2020, South African medical journal = Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir geneeskunde.

[9]  Mahima Singh,et al.  Pharmacological and non-pharmacological efforts at prevention, mitigation, and treatment for COVID-19 , 2020, Journal of drug targeting.

[10]  Devy M. Emperador,et al.  Antibody tests for identification of current and past infection with SARS‐CoV‐2 , 2020, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[11]  X. Tang,et al.  Clinical and immunological assessment of asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections , 2020, Nature Medicine.

[12]  J. Versalovic,et al.  Clinical Validation and Performance Evaluation of the Automated Vitros Total Anti–SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies Assay for Screening of Serostatus in COVID-19 , 2020, medRxiv.

[13]  J. Dogné,et al.  Clinical performance of the Elecsys electrochemiluminescent immunoassay for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 total antibodies , 2020, Clinical chemistry.

[14]  E. Price-Haywood,et al.  Hospitalization and Mortality among Black Patients and White Patients with Covid-19 , 2020, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  R. Davey,et al.  Sensitivity in Detection of Antibodies to Nucleocapsid and Spike Proteins of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 in Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019 , 2020, The Journal of Infectious Diseases.

[16]  Tara C Smith,et al.  Report from the American Society for Microbiology COVID-19 International Summit, 23 March 2020: Value of Diagnostic Testing for SARS–CoV-2/COVID-19 , 2020, mBio.

[17]  Giuseppe Lippi,et al.  Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): the portrait of a perfect storm , 2020, Annals of translational medicine.

[18]  Qi Jin,et al.  Profiling Early Humoral Response to Diagnose Novel Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) , 2020, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[19]  Mark C. Field,et al.  The Plasmodium falciparum Artemisinin Susceptibility-Associated AP-2 Adaptin μ Subunit is Clathrin Independent and Essential for Schizont Maturation , 2020, mBio.

[20]  Lei Liu,et al.  Antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 in patients of novel coronavirus disease 2019 , 2020, medRxiv.

[21]  P. Vollmar,et al.  Transmission of 2019-nCoV Infection from an Asymptomatic Contact in Germany , 2020, The New England journal of medicine.

[22]  Andrea Benedetti,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of serological tests for covid-19: systematic review and meta-analysis , 2020, BMJ.

[23]  Shyr-Chyr Chen,et al.  Multicenter evaluation of two chemiluminescence and three lateral flow immunoassays for the diagnosis of COVID-19 and assessment of antibody dynamic responses to SARS-CoV-2 in Taiwan , 2020, Emerging microbes & infections.