Using modified incremental chart parsing to ascribe intentions to animated geometric figures

People spontaneously ascribe intentions on the basis of observed behavior, and research shows that they do this even with simple geometric figures moving in a plane. The latter fact suggests that 2-D animations isolate critical information—object movement—that people use to infer the possible intentions (if any) underlying observed behavior. This article describes an approach to using motion information to model the ascription of intentions to simple figures. Incremental chart parsing is a technique developed in natural-language processing that builds up an understanding as text comes in one word at a time. We modified this technique to develop a system that uses spatiotemporal constraints about simple figures and their observed movements in order to propose candidate intentions or nonagentive causes. Candidates are identified via partial parses using a library of rules, and confidence scores are assigned so that candidates can be ranked. As observations come in, the system revises its candidates and updates the confidence scores. We describe a pilot study demonstrating that people generally perceive a simple animation in a manner consistent with the model.

[1]  Patrice D. Tremoulet,et al.  The influence of spatial context and the role of intentionality in the interpretation of animacy from motion , 2006, Perception & psychophysics.

[2]  David B. Leake Abduction, experience, and goals: a model of everyday abductive explanation , 1995, J. Exp. Theor. Artif. Intell..

[3]  Joseph D. Anderson,et al.  The myth of persistence of vision revisited , 1993 .

[4]  C. Creider Hand and Mind: What Gestures Reveal about Thought , 1994 .

[5]  P. Todd,et al.  Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart , 1999 .

[6]  B. Scassellati,et al.  Who is IT? Inferring role and intent from agent motion , 2007, 2007 IEEE 6th International Conference on Development and Learning.

[7]  P. Todd,et al.  Accurate judgments of intention from motion cues alone: A cross-cultural study , 2005 .

[8]  Brian J. Scholl,et al.  The psychophysics of chasing , 2010 .

[9]  Yuyan Luo,et al.  Three-month-old infants attribute goals to a non-human agent. , 2011, Developmental science.

[10]  A. Premack,et al.  Causal cognition : a multidisciplinary debate , 1996 .

[11]  Brian J. Scholl,et al.  The psychophysics of chasing: A case study in the perception of animacy , 2009, Cognitive Psychology.

[12]  U. Frith,et al.  Do triangles play tricks? Attribution of mental states to animated shapes in normal and abnormal development , 2000 .

[13]  M. McCloskey Naive Theories of Motion. , 1982 .

[14]  John E. Opfer,et al.  Identifying living and sentient kinds from dynamic information: the case of goal-directed versus aimless autonomous movement in conceptual change , 2002, Cognition.

[15]  Werner Lutzenberger,et al.  Social interaction revealed by motion: dynamics of neuromagnetic gamma activity. , 2010, Cerebral cortex.

[16]  Chris Mellish,et al.  Natural Language Processing in Pop-11: An Introduction to Computational Linguistics , 1989 .

[17]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Activation in Posterior Superior Temporal Sulcus Parallels Parameter Inducing the Percept of Animacy , 2005, Neuron.

[18]  C. Frith,et al.  Movement and Mind: A Functional Imaging Study of Perception and Interpretation of Complex Intentional Movement Patterns , 2000, NeuroImage.

[19]  R. Shor,et al.  Effect of preinformation upon human characteristics attributed to animated geometric figures. , 1957, Journal of Abnormal Psychology.

[20]  P. Todd,et al.  How motion reveals intention: Categorizing social interactions , 1999 .

[21]  Anna Wierzbicka,et al.  Contrastive semantics of physical activity verbs: 'Cutting' and 'chopping' in English, Polish and Japanese , 2009 .

[22]  Darren Newtson Attribution and the unit of perception of ongoing behavior. , 1973 .

[23]  Jeffrey M. Zacks,et al.  Event Segmentation , 2007, Current directions in psychological science.

[24]  Joshua B. Tenenbaum,et al.  Help or Hinder: Bayesian Models of Social Goal Inference , 2009, NIPS.

[25]  Rolf Schwitter,et al.  Incremental chart parsing with predictive hints , 2003, ALTA.

[26]  F. Thomas,et al.  The illusion of life : Disney animation , 1981 .

[27]  R. Thibadeau Artificial Perception of Actions , 1986 .

[28]  Bridgette A. Martin,et al.  Segmenting Ambiguous Events , 2003 .

[29]  P. Johnson-Laird Mental models , 1989 .

[30]  Patrice D. Tremoulet,et al.  Perception of Animacy from the Motion of a Single Object , 2000, Perception.

[31]  B. Scassellati,et al.  Inferring narrative and intention from playground games , 2008, 2008 7th IEEE International Conference on Development and Learning.

[32]  Patrice D. Tremoulet,et al.  Perceptual causality and animacy , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[33]  M. Hauser Moral Minds: How Nature Designed Our Universal Sense of Right and Wrong , 2006 .

[34]  Norman I. Badler,et al.  Representing and parameterizing agent behaviors , 2002, Proceedings of Computer Animation 2002 (CA 2002).

[35]  Wesley Kerr,et al.  Recognizing behaviors and the internal state of the participants , 2010, 2010 IEEE 9th International Conference on Development and Learning.

[36]  Jeffrey Mark Siskind,et al.  Reconstructing force-dynamic models from video sequences , 2003, Artif. Intell..

[37]  N. Taatgen,et al.  Proceedings of the Thirty-First Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society , 1999 .

[38]  Allan D. Jepson,et al.  Trajectory segmentation using dynamic programming , 2002, Object recognition supported by user interaction for service robots.

[39]  Candace L. Sidner,et al.  Plan parsing for intended response recognition in discourse 1 , 1985, Comput. Intell..

[40]  Noah D. Goodman,et al.  Theory-based Social Goal Inference , 2008 .

[41]  Steven L. Neuberg,et al.  Functional projection: how fundamental social motives can bias interpersonal perception. , 2005, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[42]  Noah D. Goodman,et al.  Cause and Intent: Social Reasoning in Causal Learning , 2009 .

[43]  B. Malle How the Mind Explains Behavior: Folk Explanations, Meaning, and Social Interaction , 2004 .

[44]  Murray Shanahan,et al.  Perception as Abduction: Turning Sensor Data Into Meaningful Representation , 2005, Cogn. Sci..

[45]  Gerald Gazdar,et al.  Natural Language Processing in PROLOG: An Introduction to Computational Linguistics , 1989 .

[46]  Robert P. Goldman,et al.  A probabilistic plan recognition algorithm based on plan tree grammars , 2009, Artif. Intell..

[47]  Mitsuo Kawato,et al.  Activation of the Human Superior Temporal Gyrus during Observation of Goal Attribution by Intentional Objects , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[48]  L. Kaufman,et al.  Distinguishing Between Animates And Inanimates: Not By Motion Alone , 1995 .

[49]  Jacob Feldman,et al.  Formation of visual “objects” in the early computation of spatial relations , 2007, Perception & psychophysics.

[50]  Shawn C. Milleville,et al.  Understanding Animate Agents , 2007, Psychological science.

[51]  F. Heider,et al.  An experimental study of apparent behavior , 1944 .

[52]  Chris L. Baker,et al.  Action understanding as inverse planning , 2009, Cognition.

[53]  Carey K. Morewedge,et al.  Timescale bias in the attribution of mind. , 2007, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[54]  Kenneth D. Forbus,et al.  CogSketch: open-domain sketch understanding for cognitive science research and for education , 2008, SBM'08.

[55]  Alex Martin,et al.  NEURAL FOUNDATIONS FOR UNDERSTANDING SOCIAL AND MECHANICAL CONCEPTS , 2003, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[56]  Paul Bloom,et al.  Social Evaluation by Preverbal Infants , 2008, Pediatric Research.

[57]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Who Sees Human? , 2010, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[58]  P. Wolff Representing causation. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[59]  R. Wyer,et al.  Effects of stereotypes on decision making and information-processing strategies. , 1985, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[60]  Jeffrey M. Zacks,et al.  A Computational Model of Event Segmentation From Perceptual Prediction , 2007, Cogn. Sci..

[61]  M. Hegarty,et al.  Impetus beliefs as default heuristics: Dissociation between explicit and implicit knowledge about motion , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[62]  P. Skudlarski,et al.  The role of the fusiform face area in social cognition: implications for the pathobiology of autism. , 2003, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[63]  Paula Tavares,et al.  Paying attention to social meaning: an FMRI study. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[64]  Roberta L. Klatzky,et al.  Traits and social stereotypes: Levels of categorization in person perception. , 1987 .

[65]  Z. Nadasdy,et al.  Taking the intentional stance at 12 months of age , 1995, Cognition.

[66]  Ehud Sharlin,et al.  Puppet Master: designing reactive character behavior by demonstration , 2008, SCA '08.