An examination of children's learning progression shifts while using touch screen virtual manipulative mathematics apps

The purpose of this study was to examine shifts in young children's learning progression levels while they interacted with virtual manipulative mathematics apps on touch-screen devices. A total of 100 children participated in six mathematics learning sequences while using 18 virtual manipulative mathematics touch-screen apps during clinical interviews. Researchers developed a micro-scoring tool to analyze video data from two camera sources (i.e., GoPro camera, wall-mounted camera). Our results showed that it is possible to document evidence of shifts in children's learning progressions while they are interacting with mathematics apps on touch-screen devices. Our results also indicated patterns in the children's interactions that were related to the shifts in their learning progression levels. These results suggest that an open-ended number of tasks with a variety of representations and tasks at varying levels of difficulty led to children refining their understanding and shaping their concept image of mathematical ideas resulting in incremental shifts in learning. The results of this study have important implications about how mathematical tasks in touch-screen apps may prompt children's incremental learning progression shifts to occur, and thereby promote opportunities for learning. We propose that design features in mathematics apps can be created to support and encourage these learning shifts.

[1]  R. Stebbins.  Exploratory research in the social sciences , 2001 .

[2]  Sharan B. Merriam,et al.  Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation , 2009 .

[3]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  Building a learning progression for celestial motion: Elementary levels from an earth‐based perspective , 2010 .

[4]  David Tall,et al.  Concept image and concept definition in mathematics with particular reference to limits and continuity , 1981 .

[5]  Christine Nadel,et al.  Case Study Research Design And Methods , 2016 .

[6]  D. Schifter,et al.  A research companion to Principles and standards for school mathematics , 2003 .

[7]  Julie Sarama,et al.  Evaluation of a learning trajectory for length in the early years , 2011 .

[8]  Johnna J. Bolyard,et al.  What Are Virtual Manipulatives , 2002 .

[9]  Claire O'Malley,et al.  Tangibles for learning: a representational analysis of physical manipulation , 2011, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[10]  Sylwia Męcfal.  Recenzja książki. Robert K. yin, Case Study Research. Design and Methods (fourth Edition), thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2009 , 2012 .

[11]  Li-Ling Chen.  Integrating iPad in a Special Education Class: A Case study , 2012 .

[12]  Katherine L. McNeill,et al.  A learning progression for scientific argumentation: Understanding student work and designing supportive instructional contexts , 2010 .

[13]  John W. Creswell,et al.  Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research , 2006 .

[14]  Jürgen Symanzik,et al.  Young Children’s Learning Performance and Efficiency when Using Virtual Manipulative Mathematics iPad Apps , 2014 .

[15]  Jeremy Roschelle,et al.  Choosing and Using Video Equipment for Data Collection , 2000 .

[16]  J. Piaget.  Child's Conception of Movement and Speed , 1970 .

[17]  Christine Nadel,et al.  Explaining Psychological Statistics , 2016 .

[18]  Shawn Y. Stevens,et al.  Developing a Hypothetical Multi-Dimensional Learning Progression for the Nature of Matter. , 2009 .

[19]  Patricia S. Moyer-Packenham,et al.  Effects of Virtual Manipulatives on Student Achievement and Mathematics Learning , 2013, Int. J. Virtual Pers. Learn. Environ..

[20]  Robin Vivian,et al.  Reducing cognitive workload during 3D geometry problem solving with an app on iPad , 2014, 2014 Science and Information Conference.

[21]  Ravit Golan Duncan,et al.  A Learning Progression for Deepening Students' Understandings of Modern Genetics across the 5th-10th Grades. , 2009 .

[22]  Anselm L. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research : techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory , 1998 .

[23]  Ian Jones,et al.  Touch Arithmetic: A process-based Computer-Aided Assessment approach for capture of problem solving steps in the context of elementary mathematics , 2014, Comput. Educ..

[24]  A. Segal,et al.  Do Gestural Interfaces Promote Thinking? Embodied Interaction: Congruent Gestures and Direct Touch Promote Performance in Math , 2011 .

[25]  Ahmet Kilic,et al.  An investigation of the use of the iPad and textbooks on the achievement of students with special needs in algebra , 2013 .

[26]  Azadeh Jamalian,et al.  Cognitive Guidelines for the Design and Evaluation of Early Mathematics Software: The Example of MathemAntics , 2013 .

[27]  C. Teddlie,et al.  SAGE Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research , 2010 .

[28]  Hee-Sun Lee,et al.  Assessing learning progression of energy concepts across middle school grades: The knowledge integration perspective , 2010 .

[29]  J. Sarama,et al.  Learning Trajectories in Mathematics Education , 2004 .

[30]  P. Moyer-Packenham,et al.  Learning Mathematics with Technology: The Influence of Virtual Manipulatives on Different Achievement Groups , 2012 .

[31]  Hiroko K. Warshauer.  Strategies to Support Productive Struggle. , 2015 .

[32]  Patricia S. Moyer-Packenham,et al.  Revisiting the Definition of a Virtual Manipulative , 2016 .

[33]  G. Goldin,et al.  A Joint Perspective on the Idea of Representation in Learning and Doing Mathematics , 2013 .

[34]  C. Dweck.  Mindset: The New Psychology of Success , 2006 .

[35]  Allison W. McCulloch,et al.  Using Mixed Methods to Analyze Video Data , 2012 .

[36]  J. Sarama,et al.  Learning Trajectories in Early Mathematics – Sequences of Acquisition and Teaching , 2010 .

[37]  R. Yin.  Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[38]  James D. Basham,et al.  A Comparison of iPads and Worksheets on Math Skills of High School Students with Emotional Disturbance , 2012 .

[39]  Nathaniel Ostashewski,et al.  iPads in the Classroom – New Technologies, Old Issues: Are they worth the effort? , 2011 .

[40]  Leslie P. Steffe,et al.  Theories of Mathematical Learning , 1996 .

[41]  A. Su,et al.  The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics , 1932, The Mathematical Gazette.

[42]  Manu Kapur,et al.  Productive Failure in Learning Math , 2014, Cogn. Sci..

[43]  Glenda Revelle,et al.  The effects of practice and input device used on young children's computer control , 1990 .

[44]  Susan E. B. Pirie,et al.  Growth in mathematical understanding: How can we characterise it and how can we represent it? , 1994 .

[45]  Johnny Saldaña,et al.  The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers , 2009 .

[46]  Rosemary S. Caffarella,et al.  Learning in Adulthood: A Comprehensive Guide, 3rd ed. (San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons/Jossey-Bass, 2007 , 2011 .

[47]  Jürgen Symanzik,et al.  Developing research tools for young children’s interactions with mathematics apps on the iPad , 2014 .

[48]  Garry Falloon,et al.  Young students using iPads: App design and content influences on their learning pathways , 2013, Comput. Educ..

[49]  Peta Spencer.  iPads: Improving numeracy learning in the early years , 2013 .

[50]  Michelle Riconscente,et al.  Results From a Controlled Study of the iPad Fractions Game Motion Math , 2013, Games Cult..

[51]  U. Wilensky,et al.  Assessing Learning as Emergent Phenomena: Moving Constructivist Statistics Beyond the Bell Curve , 2000 .

[52]  Chris Dede,et al.  Affordances and Limitations of Immersive Participatory Augmented Reality Simulations for Teaching and Learning , 2009 .

[53]  Silke Ladel,et al.  An activity-theoretic approach to multi-touch tools in early maths learning , 2011 .

[54]  N. Hoffart.  Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory , 2000 .

[55]  Jessica F. Shumway,et al.  The role of affordances in children’s learning performance and efficiency when using virtual manipulative mathematics touch-screen apps , 2015, Mathematics Education Research Journal.

[56]  Helen J. Parkin,et al.  Using technology to encourage student engagement with feedback: a literature review , 2011 .

[57]  Thomas Bartoschek,et al.  Ori-Gam i – An App fostering spatial competency development and spatial learning of children , 2013 .

[58]  최영한,et al.  미국 NCTM의 Principles and Standards for School Mathematics에 나타난 수학과 교수,학습의 이론 , 2002 .

[59]  C. W. Anderson,et al.  FOCUS ARTICLE: Implications of Research on Children's Learning for Standards and Assessment: A Proposed Learning Progression for Matter and the Atomic-Molecular Theory , 2006 .