Strongly Anisotropic Dielectric Relaxation of Water at the Nanoscale

We carried out atomistic simulations of water at the nanoscale, and we investigated the dielectric response of the liquid as a function of the distance between hydrophobic confining surfaces. We found that dipolar fluctuations are modified by the presence of surfaces up to strikingly large distances, i.e., tens of nanometers. Fluctuations are suppressed by approximately an order of magnitude in the z direction, perpendicular to the interface, and they are enhanced (up to 50%) in the x–y plane, giving rise to strong anisotropies in the components of the dielectric relaxation. Such anisotropies originate from the very presence of interfaces, and not from the details of the interaction between water and the hydrophobic surfaces. Our findings are consistent with recent terahertz and ultrafast infrared pump–probe spectroscopy experiments and bear important implications for the study of solvation under confinement.

[1]  Stephan Gekle,et al.  Dielectric profile of interfacial water and its effect on double-layer capacitance. , 2011, Physical review letters.

[2]  Stephan Gekle,et al.  Profile of the static permittivity tensor of water at interfaces: consequences for capacitance, hydration interaction and ion adsorption. , 2012, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[3]  C. Schmuttenmaer,et al.  FAR-INFRARED DIELECTRIC PROPERTIES OF POLAR LIQUIDS PROBED BY FEMTOSECOND TERAHERTZ PULSE SPECTROSCOPY , 1996 .

[4]  E. Cohn.  Ueber die Ausbreitung electrischer Schwingungen im Wasser , 1892 .

[5]  J. Grossman,et al.  Water desalination across nanoporous graphene. , 2012, Nano letters.

[6]  Alexander D. MacKerell,et al.  A simple polarizable model of water based on classical Drude oscillators , 2003 .

[7]  R. Murarka,et al.  Dielectric relaxation of aqueous solutions of hydrophilic versus amphiphilic peptides. , 2008, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[8]  T. Darden,et al.  Particle mesh Ewald: An N⋅log(N) method for Ewald sums in large systems , 1993 .

[9]  Thomas M Truskett,et al.  Thermodynamics predicts how confinement modifies the dynamics of the equilibrium hard-sphere fluid. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[10]  D. Paparo,et al.  Dielectric relaxation dynamics of water in model membranes probed by terahertz spectroscopy. , 2009, Biophysical journal.

[11]  M. C. Gordillo,et al.  Molecular dynamics simulation of liquid water confined inside graphite channels: dielectric and dynamical properties. , 2006, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[12]  Ruhong Zhou,et al.  Observation of a dewetting transition in the collapse of the melittin tetramer , 2005, Nature.

[13]  R. Car,et al.  Dipolar correlations and the dielectric permittivity of water. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[14]  P. Rossky,et al.  Computational studies of pressure, temperature, and surface effects on the structure and thermodynamics of confined water. , 2012, Annual review of physical chemistry.

[15]  Petros Koumoutsakos,et al.  On the Water−Carbon Interaction for Use in Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Graphite and Carbon Nanotubes , 2003 .

[16]  Peter J. Rossky,et al.  Surface topography dependence of biomolecular hydrophobic hydration , 1998, Nature.

[17]  G. Hummer,et al.  Water conduction through the hydrophobic channel of a carbon nanotube , 2001, Nature.

[18]  Francois Gygi,et al.  Water confined in nanotubes and between graphene sheets: a first principle study. , 2008, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[19]  D. Bratko,et al.  Electrowetting at the Nanoscale , 2007 .

[20]  Nancy E Levinger,et al.  Confinement or the nature of the interface? Dynamics of nanoscopic water. , 2007, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[21]  D. Chandler,et al.  Hydrophobicity at Small and Large Length Scales , 1999 .

[22]  B. Berne,et al.  Dewetting and hydrophobic interaction in physical and biological systems. , 2009, Annual review of physical chemistry.

[23]  A. Chandra,et al.  Dielectric Constant of Water Confined in a Nanocavity , 2001 .

[24]  D. Chandler.  Interfaces and the driving force of hydrophobic assembly , 2005, Nature.

[25]  J. Hansen,et al.  Dielectric permittivity profiles of confined polar fluids. , 2005, The Journal of chemical physics.

[26]  H. Eugene Stanley,et al.  More than one dynamic crossover in protein hydration water , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[27]  H. Eugene Stanley,et al.  Phase transitions in confined water nanofilms , 2010 .

[28]  T. Darden,et al.  A smooth particle mesh Ewald method , 1995 .

[29]  O. Steinhauser,et al.  On the calculation of the frequency-dependent dielectric constant in computer simulations , 1983 .

[30]  C. Vega,et al.  Dielectric constant of ices and water: a lesson about water interactions. , 2011, The journal of physical chemistry. A.

[31]  M. Parrinello,et al.  Canonical sampling through velocity rescaling. , 2007, The Journal of chemical physics.

[32]  T. Straatsma,et al.  THE MISSING TERM IN EFFECTIVE PAIR POTENTIALS , 1987 .

[33]  B. Montgomery Pettitt,et al.  Simple intramolecular model potentials for water , 1987 .

[34]  Hiromichi Kataura,et al.  Dielectric properties of water inside single-walled carbon nanotubes. , 2009, ACS nano.

[35]  J. Carrasco,et al.  A molecular perspective of water at metal interfaces. , 2012, Nature materials.

[36]  David Chandler,et al.  Sitting at the edge: how biomolecules use hydrophobicity to tune their interactions and function. , 2011, The journal of physical chemistry. B.