Journal of Experimental Psychology : Human Perception and Performance Relevance-Based Selectivity : The Case of Implicit Learning

Learning the structure of the environment (e.g., what usually follows what) enables animals to behave in an effective manner and prepare for future events. Unintentional learning is capable of efficiently producing such knowledge as has been demonstrated with the Artificial Grammar Learning paradigm (AGL), among others. It has been argued that selective attention is a necessary and sufficient condition for visual implicit learning. Experiment 1 shows that spatial attention is not sufficient for implicit learning. Learning does not occur if the stimuli instantiating the structure are task irrelevant. In a second experiment, we demonstrate that this holds even with abundance of available attentional resources. Together, these results challenge the current view of the relations between attention, resources, and implicit learning.

[1]  Matthias M. Müller,et al.  Can the Spotlight of Attention Be Shaped Like a Doughnut? Evidence From Steady-State Visual Evoked Potentials , 2002 .

[2]  Luis Jiménez,et al.  Which Attention Is Needed for Implicit Sequence Learning , 1999 .

[3]  D. Shanks.  IMPLICIT LEARNING AND TACIT KNOWLEDGE - AN ESSAY ON THE COGNITIVE UNCONSCIOUS - REBER,A , 1995 .

[4]  Carol A. Seger,et al.  Implicit learning. , 1994, Psychological bulletin.

[5]  M. Chun,et al.  Selective attention modulates implicit learning , 2001, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[6]  Y. Yeshurun,et al.  Blinded by irrelevance: pure irrelevance induced "blindness". , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[7]  N. Turk-Browne,et al.  Attention Is Spontaneously Biased Toward Regularities , 2013, Psychological science.

[8]  D. Shanks,et al.  Attention modulates the learning of multiple contingencies , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[9]  N. Lavie,et al.  On the Efficiency of Visual Selective Attention: Efficient Visual Search Leads to Inefficient Distractor Rejection , 1997 .

[10]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[11]  Tal Makovski,et al.  Attention Dependency in Implicit Learning of Repeated Search Context , 2007, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[12]  M. Chun,et al.  Implicit, long-term spatial contextual memory. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[13]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Allocation of attention in the visual field. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[14]  Morten H. Christiansen,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article Statistical Learning Within and Between Modalities Pitting Abstract Against Stimulus-Specific Representations , 2022 .

[15]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: A zoom lens model , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.

[16]  M. Chun,et al.  Contextual Cueing: Implicit Learning and Memory of Visual Context Guides Spatial Attention , 1998, Cognitive Psychology.

[17]  T Kumada,et al.  Feature-based control of attention: Evidence for two forms of dimension weighting , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[18]  N. Lavie.  Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[19]  E. Higgins,et al.  Motivation in Mental Accessibility: Relevance Of A Representation (ROAR) as a New Framework. , 2010, Social and personality psychology compass.

[20]  R. Hassin,et al.  Short Article: Goal relevance and artificial grammar learning , 2009, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[21]  D. Broadbent.  Task combination and selective intake of information. , 1982, Acta psychologica.

[22]  Steven P. Tipper,et al.  Negative priming , 2008, Scholarpedia.

[23]  Peter A. Frensch,et al.  One concept, multiple meanings: On how to define the concept of implicit learning. , 1998 .

[24]  John R. Vokey,et al.  Salience of Item Knowledge in Learning Artificial Grammars , 1992 .

[25]  Kazuo Shigemasu,et al.  Role of selective attention in artificial grammar learning , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[26]  Ran R. Hassin,et al.  Nonconscious Goal Pursuit in Novel Environments , 2008, Psychological science.

[27]  A. Reber.  Implicit learning of artificial grammars , 1967 .

[28]  Nilli Lavie,et al.  The role of perceptual load in inattentional blindness , 2007, Cognition.

[29]  Yuhong V. Jiang,et al.  Implicit learning of ignored visual context. , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[30]  Lei Zhu,et al.  Unconsciously learning task-irrelevant perceptual sequences , 2013, Consciousness and Cognition.

[31]  B. Scholl,et al.  The Automaticity of Visual Statistical Learning Statistical Learning , 2005 .

[32]  M. Paradiso,et al.  Feature-specific effects of selective visual attention , 1995, Vision Research.

[33]  Z. Dienes,et al.  UNCONSCIOUS KNOWLEDGE OF ARTIFICIAL GRAMMARS IS APPLIED STRATEGICALLY , 1995 .

[34]  M. Posner,et al.  Attention and the detection of signals. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology.

[35]  D. Broadbent,et al.  Two modes of learning for interactive tasks , 1988, Cognition.

[36]  E. Higgins,et al.  Motivated Remembering: Remembering as Accessibility and Accessibility as Motivational Relevance , 2013 .

[37]  Gustavo A. Vázquez,et al.  Implicit sequence learning and contextual cueing do not compete for central cognitive resources. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[38]  Arthur S. Reber,et al.  Analogic and abstraction strategies in synthetic grammar learning: A functionalist interpretation , 1978, Cognition.

[39]  Nilli Lavie,et al.  The role of perceptual load in visual awareness , 2006, Brain Research.

[40]  A. Cohen,et al.  Modularity beyond perception: Evidence from single task interference paradigms , 2007, Cognitive Psychology.

[41]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task , 1974 .

[42]  Dianne C. Berry,et al.  Negative priming and sequence learning , 2002 .

[43]  M Moscovitch,et al.  Rule-based and exemplar-based classification in artificial grammar learning , 1985, Memory & cognition.

[44]  Nilli Lavie,et al.  Load Induced Blindness , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[45]  E. Soetens,et al.  Negative priming in the SRT task: Learning of irrelevant sequences is enhanced by concurrent learning of relevant sequences , 2008 .

[46]  Eric Soetens,et al.  On the automaticity of pure perceptual sequence learning , 2011, Consciousness and Cognition.

[47]  Nilli Lavie,et al.  On the effiency of attentional selection: Efficient visual search results in inefficient rejection of distraction , 1997 .

[48]  A P Yonelinas,et al.  Consciousness, control, and confidence: the 3 Cs of recognition memory. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[49]  J. Duncan,et al.  Visual search and stimulus similarity. , 1989, Psychological review.