Concerning the matching of magnetic susceptibility differences for the compensation of background gradients in anisotropic diffusion fibre phantoms

Artificial, anisotropic fibre phantoms are nowadays increasingly used in the field of diffusion-weighted MRI. Such phantoms represent useful tools for, among others, the calibration of pulse sequences and validation of diffusion models since they can mimic well-known structural features of brain tissue on the one hand, but exhibit a reduced complexity, on the other. Among all materials, polyethylene fibres have been widely used due to their excellent properties regarding the restriction of water diffusion and surface relaxation properties. Yet the magnetic susceptibility of polyethylene can be distinctly lower than that of distilled water. This difference produces strong microscopic, background field gradients in the vicinity of fibre bundles which are not parallel to the static magnetic field. This, in turn, modulates the MRI signal behaviour. In the present work we investigate an approach to reduce the susceptibility-induced background gradients via reducing the heterogeneity in the internal magnetic susceptibility. An aqueous solution of magnesium chloride hexahydrate (MgCl2·6H2O) is used for this purpose. Its performance is demonstrated in dedicated anisotropic fibre phantoms with different geometrical configurations.

[1]  S. Meiboom,et al.  Modified Spin‐Echo Method for Measuring Nuclear Relaxation Times , 1958 .

[2]  J. E. Tanner,et al.  Spin diffusion measurements : spin echoes in the presence of a time-dependent field gradient , 1965 .

[3]  D. A. Dunnett.  Classical Electrodynamics , 2020, Nature.

[4]  K. J. Packer.  The effects of diffusion through locally inhomogeneous magnetic fields on transverse nuclear spin relaxation in heterogeneous systems. Proton transverse relaxation in striated muscle tissue , 1973 .

[5]  J. Leyte,et al.  An NMR contribution to the interpretation of the dynamical behavior of water molecules as a function of the magnesium chloride concentration at 25.degree.C , 1987 .

[6]  Jörg Kärger,et al.  Principles and Application of Self-Diffusion Measurements by Nuclear Magnetic Resonance , 1988 .

[7]  John C. Gore,et al.  Studies of diffusion in random fields produced by variations in susceptibility , 1988 .

[8]  John C. Gore,et al.  Effects of susceptibility variations on NMR measurements of diffusion , 1991 .

[9]  J C Gore,et al.  Studies of restricted diffusion in heterogeneous media containing variations in susceptibility , 1991, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[10]  Aaron J. Miller,et al.  The use of power images to perform quantitative analysis on low SNR MR images. , 1993, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[11]  D. Ballon,et al.  Resolution enhanced NMR spectroscopy in biological systems via magnetic susceptibility matched sample immersion chambers , 1993, Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

[12]  M. G. Prammer,et al.  The CPMG Pulse Sequence in Strong Magnetic Field Gradients with Applications to Oil-Well Logging , 1995 .

[13]  C. Beaulieu,et al.  An in vitro evaluation of the effects of local magnetic‐susceptibility‐induced gradients on anisotropic water diffusion in nerve , 1996, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[14]  J. Schenck.  The role of magnetic susceptibility in magnetic resonance imaging: MRI magnetic compatibility of the first and second kinds. , 1996, Medical physics.

[15]  R. Fox,et al.  Classical Electrodynamics, 3rd ed. , 1999 .

[16]  Yu-Chung N. Cheng,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Physical Principles and Sequence Design , 1999 .

[17]  G. Barker,et al.  An in vivo evaluation of the effects of local magnetic susceptibility-induced gradients on water diffusion measurements in human brain. , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance.

[18]  N. J. Shah,et al.  A New Method for Fast Multislice T 1 Mapping , 2001, NeuroImage.

[19]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  A global optimisation method for robust affine registration of brain images , 2001, Medical Image Anal..

[20]  D. Le Bihan,et al.  Diffusion tensor imaging: Concepts and applications , 2001, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[21]  Phillip Zhe Sun,et al.  Background gradient suppression in pulsed gradient stimulated echo measurements. , 2003, Journal of magnetic resonance.

[22]  V. Wedeen,et al.  Reduction of eddy‐current‐induced distortion in diffusion MRI using a twice‐refocused spin echo , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[23]  Ching Yao,et al.  Validation of diffusion spectrum magnetic resonance imaging with manganese-enhanced rat optic tracts and ex vivo phantoms , 2003, NeuroImage.

[24]  V. Kiselev,et al.  Effect of magnetic field gradients induced by microvasculature on NMR measurements of molecular self-diffusion in biological tissues. , 2004, Journal of magnetic resonance.

[25]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL , 2004, NeuroImage.

[26]  J. Sijbers,et al.  Maximum likelihood estimation of signal amplitude and noise variance from MR data , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[27]  D. Tuch.  Q‐ball imaging , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[28]  D. LeBihan,et al.  Validation of q-ball imaging with a diffusion fibre-crossing phantom on a clinical scanner , 2005, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[29]  R. Bowtell,et al.  Application of a Fourier‐based method for rapid calculation of field inhomogeneity due to spatial variation of magnetic susceptibility , 2005 .

[30]  Nathan Yanasak,et al.  Use of capillaries in the construction of an MRI phantom for the assessment of diffusion tensor imaging: demonstration of performance. , 2006, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[31]  Osamu Abe,et al.  Flexible ex vivo phantoms for validation of diffusion tensor tractography on a clinical scanner , 2006, Radiation Medicine.

[32]  Xenophon Papademetris,et al.  Rapid calculations of susceptibility-induced magnetostatic field perturbations for in vivo magnetic resonance , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[33]  Alan Connelly,et al.  Robust determination of the fibre orientation distribution in diffusion MRI: Non-negativity constrained super-resolved spherical deconvolution , 2007, NeuroImage.

[34]  Jeff H. Duyn,et al.  High-field MRI of brain cortical substructure based on signal phase , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[35]  William S. Price,et al.  Suppression of background gradients in (B0 gradient‐based) NMR diffusion experiments , 2007 .

[36]  E. Achten,et al.  The design of anisotropic diffusion phantoms for the validation of diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.

[37]  J. Mangin,et al.  New diffusion phantoms dedicated to the study and validation of high‐angular‐resolution diffusion imaging (HARDI) models , 2008, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[38]  E. Achten,et al.  Simulation and experimental verification of the diffusion in an anisotropic fiber phantom. , 2008, Journal of magnetic resonance.

[39]  M. E. Bellemann,et al.  Anisotropic Phantoms for Quantitative Diffusion Tensor Imaging and Fiber-Tracking Validation , 2008 .

[40]  Chun-Hung Yeh,et al.  Resolving crossing fibres using constrained spherical deconvolution: Validation using diffusion-weighted imaging phantom data , 2008, NeuroImage.

[41]  Alexander Leemans,et al.  The B‐matrix must be rotated when correcting for subject motion in DTI data , 2009, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[42]  P. Boesiger,et al.  Construction of a temperature‐controlled diffusion phantom for quality control of diffusion measurements , 2009, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[43]  Bram Stieltjes,et al.  On the effects of dephasing due to local gradients in diffusion tensor imaging experiments: relevance for diffusion tensor imaging fiber phantoms. , 2009, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[44]  Santiago Aja-Fernández,et al.  Noise estimation in single- and multiple-coil magnetic resonance data based on statistical models. , 2009, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[45]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  Bayesian analysis of neuroimaging data in FSL , 2009, NeuroImage.

[46]  Behrens,et al.  Validation of Tractography , 2009 .

[47]  P. Basser,et al.  In vivo measurement of axon diameter distribution in the corpus callosum of rat brain. , 2009, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[48]  Jan Sijbers,et al.  ExploreDTI: a graphical toolbox for processing, analyzing, and visualizing diffusion MR data , 2009 .

[49]  M. Fukunaga,et al.  Sensitivity of MRI resonance frequency to the orientation of brain tissue microstructure , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[50]  Orientation and Microstructure Effects on Susceptibility Reconstruction : a Diffusion Phantom Study , 2010 .

[51]  Chunlei Liu.  Susceptibility tensor imaging , 2010, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[52]  F Fasano,et al.  In vitro and in vivo MR evaluation of internal gradient to assess trabecular bone density , 2010, Physics in medicine and biology.

[53]  M L Johns,et al.  Nuclear magnetic resonance relaxation and diffusion in the presence of internal gradients: the effect of magnetic field strength. , 2010, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[54]  Maxime Descoteaux,et al.  Quantitative evaluation of 10 tractography algorithms on a realistic diffusion MR phantom , 2011, NeuroImage.

[55]  C. Meyer,et al.  Diffusion coefficient measurement using a temperature‐controlled fluid for quality control in multicenter studies , 2011, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[56]  Rachid Deriche,et al.  Multiple q-shell diffusion propagator imaging , 2011, Medical Image Anal..

[57]  B. Stieltjes,et al.  Novel spherical phantoms for Q‐ball imaging under in vivo conditions , 2011, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[58]  Xing Qiu,et al.  Quantification of accuracy and precision of multi-center DTI measurements: A diffusion phantom and human brain study , 2011, NeuroImage.

[59]  Ezequiel Farrher,et al.  Novel multisection design of anisotropic diffusion phantoms. , 2012, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[60]  Jürgen R. Reichenbach,et al.  The future of susceptibility contrast for assessment of anatomy and function , 2012, NeuroImage.

[61]  Umberto Sabatini,et al.  Potential diagnostic role of the MRI-derived internal magnetic field gradient in calcaneus cancellous bone for evaluating postmenopausal osteoporosis at 3T. , 2013, Bone.

[62]  S. Capuani,et al.  Microstructural differences between osteoporotic and osteoarthritic femoral cancellous bone: an in vitro magnetic resonance micro-imaging investigation , 2013, Aging Clinical and Experimental Research.

[63]  Karla L. Miller,et al.  Detecting microstructural properties of white matter based on compartmentalization of magnetic susceptibility , 2013, NeuroImage.

[64]  Derek K. Jones,et al.  Investigating the prevalence of complex fiber configurations in white matter tissue with diffusion magnetic resonance imaging , 2013, Human brain mapping.

[65]  Bram Stieltjes,et al.  Investigation of resolution effects using a specialized diffusion tensor phantom , 2014, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[66]  Giulia Di Pietro,et al.  Internal Magnetic Field Gradients in Heterogeneous Porous Systems: Comparison Between Spin-Echo and Diffusion Decay Internal Field (DDIF) Method , 2014 .

[67]  Yi Wang,et al.  Quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM): Decoding MRI data for a tissue magnetic biomarker , 2014, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[68]  E. Macaluso,et al.  New insight into the contrast in diffusional kurtosis images: Does it depend on magnetic susceptibility? , 2015, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[69]  P. Hubbard,et al.  Biomimetic phantom for the validation of diffusion magnetic resonance imaging , 2015, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[70]  Ana-Maria Oros-Peusquens,et al.  Multistage Background Field Removal (MUBAFIRE)—Compensating for B 0 Distortions at Ultra-High Field , 2015, PloS one.

[71]  Natasha Lepore,et al.  Fiber estimation and tractography in diffusion MRI: Development of simulated brain images and comparison of multi-fiber analysis methods at clinical b-values , 2015, NeuroImage.

[72]  Risto A. Kauppinen,et al.  Diffusion-mediated nuclear spin phase decoherence in cylindrically porous materials , 2016, Journal of magnetic resonance.

[73]  Paul Strauss,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging Physical Principles And Sequence Design , 2016 .

[74]  Emiliano Macaluso,et al.  The γ-parameter of anomalous diffusion quantified in human brain by MRI depends on local magnetic susceptibility differences , 2017, NeuroImage.

[75]  J. Rumble.  CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics , 2019 .