Mechanical aspects of CO₂ angiography.

The aim of this paper is to clarify some physical-mechanical aspects involved in the carbon dioxide angiography procedure (CO₂ angiography), with a particular attention to a possible damage of the vascular wall. CO₂ angiography is widely used on patients with iodine intolerance. The injection of a gaseous element, in most cases manually performed, requires a long training period. Automatic systems allow better control of the injection and the study of the mechanical behaviour of the gas. CO₂ injections have been studied by using manual and automatic systems. Pressures, flows and jet shapes have been monitored by using a cardiovascular mock. Photographic images of liquid and gaseous jet have been recorded in different conditions, and the vascular pressure rises during injection have been monitored. The shape of the liquid jet during the catheter washing phase is straight in the catheter direction and there is no jet during gas injection. Gas bubbles are suddenly formed at the catheter's hole and move upwards: buoyancy is the only governing phenomenon and no bubbles fragmentation is detected. The pressure rise in the vessel depends on the injection pressure and volume and in some cases of manual injection it may double the basal vascular pressure values. CO₂ angiography is a powerful and safe procedure which diffusion will certainly increase, although some aspects related to gas injection and chamber filling are not jet well known. The use of an automatic system permits better results, shorter training period and limitation of vascular wall damage risk.

[1]  T. Schmitz-Rode,et al.  CO2 spray mini-injector for digital subtraction angiography versus PC-controlled injection system: Experiments in dogs , 1993, CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology.

[2]  P. Cheng,et al.  Superior sensitivity of angiographic detection of arteriovenous fistula after biopsy in a renal allograft with CO2 compared with iodinated contrast medium. , 2006, Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR.

[3]  K. Major,et al.  Carbon dioxide digital subtraction angiography-assisted endovascular aortic aneurysm repair in the azotemic patient. , 2007, Journal of vascular surgery.

[4]  P. E. Anagbo Bubble deformation in high‐velocity gas injection , 1982 .

[5]  I. Hawkins,et al.  Potential Air Contamination During CO2 Angiography Using a Hand-Held Syringe: Theoretical Considerations and Gas Chromatography , 2006, CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology.

[6]  J. Lewin,et al.  MR imaging-guided vascular procedures using CO2 as a contrast agent. , 2003, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[7]  P. Huber,et al.  CO2 angiography , 2002, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[8]  B. Funaki Carbon dioxide angiography. , 2008, Seminars in interventional radiology.

[9]  D L Lacey,et al.  Carbon dioxide angiography: effect of injection parameters on bolus configuration. , 1999, Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR.

[10]  H. Richter,et al.  INSTABILITY ANALYSIS OF THE TRANSITION FROM BUBBLING TO JETTING IN A GAS INJECTED INTO A LIQUID , 1997 .

[11]  G. Marchal,et al.  Upper-extremity venography: CO2 versus iodinated contrast material. , 2006, Radiology.

[12]  D. Kessel,et al.  Carbon dioxide angiography: a simple and safe system of delivery. , 2005, Clinical radiology.

[13]  M. Johnson,et al.  Accuracy of CO2 angiography in vessel diameter assessment: a comparative study of CO2 versus iodinated contrast material in an aortoiliac flow model. , 2000, Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR.

[14]  T M Buckenham,et al.  Carbon dioxide angiography of the lower limbs: initial experience with an automated carbon dioxide injector. , 1999, Clinical radiology.

[15]  K. Song,et al.  Gas dynamics in CO2 angiography: in vitro evaluation in a circulatory system model. , 1999, Investigative radiology.

[16]  C. Wilcox,et al.  CO2 digital angiography: a safer contrast agent for renal vascular imaging? , 1994, American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation.

[17]  L. Kabbani,et al.  Catheter-less angiography for endovascular aortic aneurysm repair: a new application of carbon dioxide as a contrast agent. , 2008, Journal of vascular surgery.

[18]  I. Hawkins,et al.  A Simple DSA Method to Detect Air Contamination During CO2 Venous Studies , 2006, CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology.

[19]  Angelo Branzi,et al.  Mechanical simulator of the cardiovascular system. , 2009, Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics.

[20]  J. Raffetto,et al.  Arterial imaging in patients with lower extremity ischemia and diabetes mellitus , 2011 .

[21]  G. Irons,et al.  A water model and numerical study of the spout height in a gas-stirred vessel , 2002 .

[22]  D. Kessel,et al.  The Current Status of the Use of Carbon Dioxide in Diagnostic and Interventional Angiographic Procedures , 2006, CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology.

[23]  J. Garcia,et al.  Assessment of CO2 arteriography in arterial occlusive disease of the lower extremities. , 2000, Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR.

[24]  Jr. J. Bayne Selby Carbon Dioxide Angiography, Principles, Techniques, and Practices. , 2008 .

[25]  D. Srivastava,et al.  Comparison of intra‐arterial digital subtraction angiography using carbon dioxide by ‘home made’ delivery system and conventional iodinated contrast media in the evaluation of peripheral arterial occlusive disease of the lower limbs , 2009, Journal of medical imaging and radiation oncology.

[26]  J. Carreira,et al.  CO2 as a contrast medium in endoluminal treatment of high flow vascular malformations. , 1999, European journal of radiology.