Nanosecond X-ray diffraction of shock-compressed superionic water ice

Since Bridgman’s discovery of five solid water (H2O) ice phases1 in 1912, studies on the extraordinary polymorphism of H2O have documented more than seventeen crystalline and several amorphous ice structures2,3, as well as rich metastability and kinetic effects4,5. This unique behaviour is due in part to the geometrical frustration of the weak intermolecular hydrogen bonds and the sizeable quantum motion of the light hydrogen ions (protons). Particularly intriguing is the prediction that H2O becomes superionic6–12—with liquid-like protons diffusing through the solid lattice of oxygen—when subjected to extreme pressures exceeding 100 gigapascals and high temperatures above 2,000 kelvin. Numerical simulations suggest that the characteristic diffusion of the protons through the empty sites of the oxygen solid lattice (1) gives rise to a surprisingly high ionic conductivity above 100 Siemens per centimetre, that is, almost as high as typical metallic (electronic) conductivity, (2) greatly increases the ice melting temperature7–13 to several thousand kelvin, and (3) favours new ice structures with a close-packed oxygen lattice13–15. Because confining such hot and dense H2O in the laboratory is extremely challenging, experimental data are scarce. Recent optical measurements along the Hugoniot curve (locus of shock states) of water ice VII showed evidence of superionic conduction and thermodynamic signatures for melting16, but did not confirm the microscopic structure of superionic ice. Here we use laser-driven shockwaves to simultaneously compress and heat liquid water samples to 100–400 gigapascals and 2,000–3,000 kelvin. In situ X-ray diffraction measurements show that under these conditions, water solidifies within a few nanoseconds into nanometre-sized ice grains that exhibit unambiguous evidence for the crystalline oxygen lattice of superionic water ice. The X-ray diffraction data also allow us to document the compressibility of ice at these extreme conditions and a temperature- and pressure-induced phase transformation from a body-centred-cubic ice phase (probably ice X) to a novel face-centred-cubic, superionic ice phase, which we name ice XVIII2,17.The atomic structure of H2O is documented at several million atmospheres of pressure and temperatures of several thousand degrees, revealing shockwave-induced ultrafast crystallization and a novel water ice phase, ice XVIII, with exotic superionic properties.

[1]  D. Dolan,et al.  Nanosecond freezing of water under multiple shock wave compression: optical transmission and imaging measurements. , 2004, The Journal of chemical physics.

[2]  Razvan Caracas,et al.  Dynamical instabilities of ice X. , 2008, Physical review letters.

[3]  D. Dolan,et al.  A metastable limit for compressed liquid water , 2007 .

[4]  Gilbert W. Collins,et al.  Experimental evidence for superionic water ice using shock compression , 2018 .

[5]  P. W. Bridgman Water in the liquid and five solid forms under pressure , 1912 .

[6]  H. Stanley,et al.  The relationship between liquid, supercooled and glassy water , 1998, Nature.

[7]  L. del Rosso,et al.  New porous water ice metastable at atmospheric pressure obtained by emptying a hydrogen-filled ice , 2016, Nature Communications.

[8]  Kei Hirose,et al.  Simultaneous high-pressure and high-temperature volume measurements of ice VII and its thermal equation of state , 2010 .

[9]  S. Torquato,et al.  The phase diagram of high-pressure superionic ice , 2015, Nature Communications.

[10]  Y. Fei,et al.  Constraining the equation of state of fluid H , 2002 .

[11]  Parrinello,et al.  New high-pressure phase of ice. , 1996, Physical review letters.

[12]  R. Caracas,et al.  Superionic-Superionic Phase Transitions in Body-Centered Cubic H_{2}O Ice. , 2016, Physical review letters.

[13]  Jon H. Eggert,et al.  Experimental evidence for a phase transition in magnesium oxide at exoplanet pressures , 2013 .

[14]  T. Iitaka,et al.  Compression of H 2 O ice to 126 GPa and implications for hydrogen-bond symmetrization: Synchrotron x-ray diffraction measurements and density-functional calculations , 2008 .

[15]  B. Militzer,et al.  New phases of water ice predicted at megabar pressures. , 2010, Physical review letters.

[16]  M. Parrinello,et al.  Superionic and metallic states of water and ammonia at giant planet conditions. , 1999, Science.

[17]  Y. Shibuta,et al.  Heterogeneity in homogeneous nucleation from billion-atom molecular dynamics simulation of solidification of pure metal , 2017, Nature Communications.

[18]  H. J. Lee,et al.  Ultrafast visualization of crystallization and grain growth in shock-compressed SiO2 , 2015, Nature Communications.

[19]  M. Hanfland,et al.  Modulated phases and proton centring in ice observed by X-ray diffraction up to 170 GPa , 1999, Nature.

[20]  M. Desjarlais,et al.  Phase diagram and electrical conductivity of high energy-density water from density functional theory. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[21]  Burkhard Militzer,et al.  Superionic to superionic phase change in water: consequences for the interiors of uranus and neptune. , 2012, Physical review letters.

[22]  T. Mattsson,et al.  Equation of state and phase diagram of water at ultrahigh pressures as in planetary interiors , 2009 .

[23]  R. Hoffmann,et al.  High pressure ices , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[24]  J. Abascal,et al.  Anomalies in bulk supercooled water at negative pressure , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[25]  Klein,et al.  New high-pressure phases of ice. , 1988, Physical review letters.

[26]  George Malenkov Liquid water and ices: understanding the structure and physical properties. , 2009, Journal of physics. Condensed matter : an Institute of Physics journal.

[27]  Y. Ohishi,et al.  Experimental evidence of superionic conduction in H2O ice. , 2012, The Journal of chemical physics.

[28]  H. Mao,et al.  Static compression of H2O-ice to 128 GPa (1.28 Mbar) , 1987, Nature.

[29]  Nallasivam Palanisamy,et al.  Corrigendum: TRIP13 promotes error-prone nonhomologous end joining and induces chemoresistance in head and neck cancer , 2016, Nature Communications.

[30]  J. Fortney,et al.  New indication for a dichotomy in the interior structure of Uranus and Neptune from the application of modified shape and rotation data , 2012, 1207.2309.

[31]  F. Gygi,et al.  Melting of ice under pressure , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[32]  Gilbert W. Collins,et al.  Powder diffraction from solids in the terapascal regime. , 2012, The Review of scientific instruments.

[33]  R. Redmer,et al.  Construction of a thermodynamic potential for the water ices VII and X , 2015 .

[34]  M. Desjarlais,et al.  Ab initio calculation of thermodynamic potentials and entropies for superionic water. , 2016, Physical review. E.

[35]  Debbie J. Stokes,et al.  Ice structures, patterns, and processes: A view across the icefields , 2012, 1207.3738.

[36]  D. Dolan,et al.  Compression Freezing Kinetics of Water to Ice VII. , 2017, Physical review letters.

[37]  W. Nellis,et al.  Electrical conductivity of water compressed dynamically to pressures of 70–180 GPa (0.7–1.8 Mbar) , 2001 .

[38]  T. Mattsson,et al.  The phase diagram of water and the magnetic fields of Uranus and Neptune , 2011 .