Review and Theory Symbiosis: An Introspective Retrospective

This paper presents a polylithic framework of review and theory development (RTD) papers. Based upon a reflective analysis of review papers that I have written, read, and/or reviewed, I build a framework suggesting four types of RTD papers: organizing reviews, assessing reviews, specific-theorizing reviews, and broad-theorizing reviews. The four types vary according to the research focus and research objectives, with research focus ranging from primarily description to the identification of gaps, and research objective ranging from primarily synthesizing to primarily theorizing. The framework and accompanying discussion are intended to provide scholars a perspective of the different ways that theory development and review papers intersect. The paper proposes criteria to help evaluate the quality of RTD papers and provides suggestions to authors on how to craft RTD papers.

[1]  Björn Niehaves,et al.  Standing on the Shoulders of Giants: Challenges and Recommendations of Literature Search in Information Systems Research , 2015, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[2]  Shirley Gregor,et al.  The Nature of Theory in Information Systems , 2006, MIS Q..

[3]  M. Alavi,et al.  KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT AND KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS : CONCEPTUAL FOUNDATIONS AND AN AGENDA FOR RESEARCH , 2007 .

[4]  Peter Fleming,et al.  From Borrowing to Blending: Rethinking the Processes of Organizational Theory Building , 2011 .

[5]  Frantz Rowe,et al.  What literature review is not: diversity, boundaries and recommendations , 2014, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[6]  Samuel B. Bacharach,et al.  Organizational Theories: Some Criteria for Evaluation , 1989 .

[7]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  Analyzing the Past to Prepare for the Future: Writing a Literature Review , 2002, MIS Q..

[8]  Daniel C. Feldman.  What are We Talking About When We Talk About Theory? , 2004 .

[9]  D. Whetten.  What Constitutes a Theoretical Contribution , 1989 .

[10]  J. Webster,et al.  The Dimensionality and Correlates of Flow in Human-Computer Interactions. , 1993 .

[11]  Elena Gorbacheva,et al.  Achieving Rigor in Literature Reviews: Insights from Qualitative Data Analysis and Tool-Support , 2015, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[12]  K. Weick.  What Theory Is Not, Theorizing Is , 1995 .

[13]  Guy Paré,et al.  A Framework for Guiding and Evaluating Literature Reviews , 2015, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[14]  Sebastian K. Boell,et al.  On being ‘systematic’ in literature reviews in IS , 2015, J. Inf. Technol..

[15]  Alexander Benlian,et al.  Theory of Knowledge for Literature Reviews: An Epistemological Model, Taxonomy and Empirical Analysis of IS Literature , 2015, ICIS.

[16]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  Understanding frameworks and reviews: a commentary to assist us in moving our field forward by analyzing our past , 2007, DATB.

[17]  Guido Schryen,et al.  Writing Qualitative IS Literature Reviews - Guidelines for Synthesis, Interpretation, and Guidance of Research , 2015, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[18]  Barry M. Staw,et al.  What Theory is Not , 1995 .

[19]  Chitu Okoli,et al.  A Guide to Conducting a Standalone Systematic Literature Review , 2015, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[20]  Guy Paré,et al.  Synthesizing information systems knowledge: A typology of literature reviews , 2015, Inf. Manag..

[21]  LeidnerDorothy,et al.  Review of IS Security Policy Compliance , 2017 .