In vivo SNR in DENSE MRI; temporal and regional effects of field strength, receiver coil sensitivity and flip angle strategies.

AIM The influences on the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of Displacement ENcoding with Stimulated Echoes (DENSE) MRI of field strength, receiver coil sensitivity and choice of flip angle strategy have been previously investigated individually. In this study, all of these parameters have been investigated in the same setting, and a mutual comparison of their impact on SNR is presented. MATERIALS AND METHODS Ten healthy volunteers were imaged in a 1.5 T and a 3 T MRI system, using standard five- or six-channel cardiac coils as well as 32-channel coils, with four different excitation patterns. Variation of spatial coil sensitivity was assessed by regional SNR analysis. RESULTS SNR ranging from 2.8 to 30.5 was found depending on the combination of excitation patterns, coil sensitivity and field strength. The SNR at 3 T was 53±26% higher than at 1.5 T (P<.001), whereas spatial differences of 59±26% were found in the ventricle (P<.001). Thirty-two-channel coils provided 52±29% higher SNR compared to standard five- or six-channel coils (P<.001). A fixed flip angle strategy provided an excess of 50% higher SNR in half of the imaged cardiac cycle compared to a sweeping flip angle strategy, and a single-phase acquisition provided a sixfold increase of SNR compared to a cine acquisition. CONCLUSION The effect of field strength and receiver coil sensitivity influences the SNR with the same order of magnitude, whereas flip angle strategy can have a larger effect on SNR. Thus, careful choice of imaging hardware in combination with adaptation of the acquisition protocol is crucial in order to realize sufficient SNR in DENSE MRI.

[1]  T E Conturo,et al.  Signal‐to‐noise in phase angle reconstruction: Dynamic range extension using phase reference offsets , 1990, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[2]  S. Maier,et al.  Improved myocardial tagging contrast , 1993, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[3]  H. Wen,et al.  DENSE: displacement encoding with stimulated echoes in cardiac functional MRI. , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance.

[4]  El-Sayed H Ibrahim,et al.  Improved myocardial tagging contrast in cine balanced SSFP images , 2006, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[5]  M. Gutberlet,et al.  Influence of high magnetic field strengths and parallel acquisition strategies on image quality in cardiac 2D CINE magnetic resonance imaging: comparison of 1.5 T vs. 3.0 T , 2005, European Radiology.

[6]  Jerry L Prince,et al.  Cardiac motion tracking using CINE harmonic phase (HARP) magnetic resonance imaging , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[7]  R. Henkelman.  Measurement of signal intensities in the presence of noise in MR images. , 1985, Medical physics.

[8]  E. M. Pedersen,et al.  Single breath-hold slice-following CSPAMM myocardial tagging , 1999, Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine.

[9]  P Boesiger,et al.  True myocardial motion tracking , 1994, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[10]  Peter Kellman,et al.  Image reconstruction in SNR units: A general method for SNR measurement † , 2005, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[11]  P. Kellman,et al.  Improved cine displacement‐encoded MRI using balanced steady‐state free precession and time‐adaptive sensitivity encoding parallel imaging at 3 T , 2007, NMR in biomedicine.

[12]  S. Fraser,et al.  Circumferential Strain in the Wall of the Common Carotid Artery: Comparing Displacement-encoded and Cine Mri in Volunteers Nih Public Access Materials and Methods , 2022 .

[13]  Patrick A Helm,et al.  Balanced multipoint displacement encoding for DENSE MRI , 2009, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[14]  P Boesiger,et al.  Limitations of stimulated echo acquisition mode (steam) techniques in cardiac applications , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[15]  F. Epstein,et al.  3D myocardial tissue tracking with slice followed cine DENSE MRI , 2008, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[16]  J. Hennig,et al.  Balanced left ventricular myocardial SSFP‐tagging at 1.5T and 3T , 2008, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[17]  C. Hardy,et al.  32‐element receiver‐coil array for cardiac imaging , 2006, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[18]  L. Axel,et al.  Increasing the signal‐to‐noise ratio in DENSE MRI by combining displacement‐encoded echoes , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[19]  Andrew E Arai,et al.  DENSE with SENSE. , 2005, Journal of magnetic resonance.

[20]  Peter Kellman.  Erratum to Kellman P, McVeigh ER. Image reconstruction in SNR units: a general method for SNR measurement. Magn Reson Med. 2005;54:1439–1447. , 2007 .

[21]  J. Glockner,et al.  Myocardial tagging and strain analysis at 3 Tesla: Comparison with 1.5 Tesla imaging , 2006, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[22]  Thoralf Niendorf,et al.  Highly parallel volumetric imaging with a 32‐element RF coil array , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[23]  J. Zwanenburg,et al.  DENSE and HARP: Two views on the same technique of phase‐based strain imaging , 2006, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[24]  F. Epstein,et al.  Complementary displacement‐encoded MRI for contrast‐enhanced infarct detection and quantification of myocardial function in mice , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.