The interaction of lexical and sublexical information in spelling: What's the point?

Most theories of spelling propose two major processes for translating between orthography and phonology: a lexical process for retrieving the spellings of familiar words and a sublexical process for assembling the spellings of unfamiliar letter strings based on knowledge of the systematic correspondences between phonemes and graphemes. We investigated how the lexical and sublexical processes function and interact in spelling by selectively interfering with the sublexical process in a dysgraphic individual. By comparing spelling performance under normal conditions and under conditions of sublexical disruption we were able to gain insight into the functioning and the unique contributions of the sublexical process. The results support the hypothesis that the sublexical process serves to strengthen a target word and provide it with a competitive advantage over orthographically and phonologically similar word neighbours that are in competition with the target for selection.

[1]  B. Rapp Uncovering the Cognitive Architecture of Spelling , 2002 .

[2]  Paul R. Hanna,et al.  Phoneme-grapheme correspondences as cues to spelling improvement , 1966 .

[3]  A. Caramazza,et al.  On the distinction between deficits of access and deficits of storage : a question of theory , 1993 .

[4]  A. W. Ellis Normality and pathology in cognitive functions , 1982 .

[5]  A. Caramazza,et al.  Operation of the phoneme-to-grapheme conversion mechanism in a brain injured patient , 1990 .

[6]  J Dérouesné,et al.  Lexical or orthographic agraphia. , 1981, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[7]  Ruth Campbell,et al.  Writing nonwords to dictation , 1983, Brain and Language.

[8]  J. Baron,et al.  Use of orthographic and word-specific knowledge in reading words aloud. , 1976 .

[9]  Alfonso Caramazza,et al.  When a Rose is a Rose in Speech but a Tulip in Writing , 1999, Cortex.

[10]  T Shallice,et al.  Phonological agraphia and the lexical route in writing. , 1981, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[11]  Alfonso Caramazza,et al.  Aspects of the Spelling Process: Evidence from a Case of Acquired Dysgraphia , 1986 .

[12]  M Coltheart,et al.  DRC: a dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. , 2001, Psychological review.

[13]  K. Paap,et al.  Dual-route models of print to sound: Still a good horse race , 1991 .

[14]  J. G. Snodgrass,et al.  A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[15]  Alfonso Caramazza,et al.  Mechanisms for accessing lexical representations for output: Evidence from a category-specific semantic deficit , 1991, Brain and Language.

[16]  M. Zorzi,et al.  Two routes or one in reading aloud? A connectionist dual-process model. , 1998 .

[17]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Understanding normal and impaired word reading: computational principles in quasi-regular domains. , 1996, Psychological review.

[18]  Claus-W. Wallesch,et al.  Acquired Disorders of Writing and Spelling , 1993 .

[19]  Keith E. Stanovich,et al.  Experiments on the spelling-to-sound regularity effect in word recognition , 1978 .

[20]  B. Rapp,et al.  The integration of information across lexical and sublexical processes in spelling , 2002, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[21]  K. Patterson Lexical but nonsemantic spelling , 1986 .

[22]  Max Coltheart,et al.  Psycholinguistic assessments of language processing in aphasia (PALPA) , 1996 .

[23]  Fernando Cuetos,et al.  Writing processes in a shallow orthography , 1993 .

[24]  K. Patterson,et al.  The impact of semantic memory impairment on spelling: evidence from semantic dementia , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[25]  H. Kucera,et al.  Computational analysis of present-day American English , 1967 .

[26]  J. Hodges,et al.  Progressive Dysgraphia: Co-occurrence of Central and Peripheral Impairments , 1997 .

[27]  Christopher Barry,et al.  Lexical Priming and Sound-to-Spelling Contingency Effects in Nonword Spelling , 1988 .