Uncertainty in Multi-Pathway Risk Assessment for Combustion Facilities

ABSTRACT Multi-pathway risk assessments (MPRAs) of contaminant emissions to the atmosphere consider both direct exposures, via ambient air, and indirect exposures, via deposition to land and water. MPRAs embody numerous interconnected models and parameters. Concatenation of many multiplicative and incompletely defined assumptions and inputs can result in risk estimates with considerable uncertainties, which are difficult to quantify and elucidate. Here, three MPRA case-studies approach uncertainties in ways that better inform context-specific judgments of risk. In the first case, default values predicted implausibly large impacts; substitution of site-specific data within conservative methods resulted in reasonable and intuitive worst-case estimates. In the second, a simpler, clearly worst-case water quality model sufficed to demonstrate acceptable risks. In the third case, exposures were intentionally and transparently overestimated. Choices made within particular MPRAs depend on availability of data as suitable replacements for default assumptions, regulatory requirements, and thoughtful consideration of the concerns of interested stakeholders. Explicit consideration of the biases inherent in each risk assessment lends greater credibility to the assessment results, and can form the bases for evidence-based decision-making.

[1]  Timo Assmuth,et al.  Policy and Science Implications of the Framing and Qualities of Uncertainty in Risks: Toxic and Beneficial Fish from the Baltic Sea , 2011, AMBIO.

[2]  Timothy L. Lash,et al.  REPORT TO THE COMMISSION ON RISK ASSESSMENT AND RISK MANAGEMENT: Health risk assessments prepared per the risk assessment reforms under consideration in the U.S. Congress , 1995 .

[3]  Igor Linkov,et al.  Emissions of metals and polychlorinated dibenzo(p)dioxins and furans (PCDD/Fs) from Portland cement manufacturing plants: inter-kiln variability and dependence on fuel-types. , 2011, The Science of the total environment.

[4]  William E. Kastenberg,et al.  A multimedia, multiple pathway exposure assessment of atrazine: fate, transport and uncertainty analysis , 1999 .

[5]  C. M. Marin,et al.  The 3MRA Risk Assessment Framework—A Flexible Approach for Performing Multimedia, Multipathway, and Multireceptor Risk Assessments Under Uncertainty , 2003 .

[6]  Margaret E. Coleman,et al.  Further Deliberations on Uncertainty in Risk Assessment , 2003 .

[7]  Stephen G. Zemba,et al.  Risk Assessment for the Evaluation of Kiln Stack Emissions and RCRA Fugitive Emissions from the Lone Star Alternate Fuels Facility, Greencastle, Indiana , 2001 .

[8]  R. D. Sharp,et al.  Review and analysis of parameters for assessing transport of environmentally released radionuclides through agriculture , 1984 .

[9]  I Linkov,et al.  Radionuclides in fruit systems: model-model intercomparison study. , 2006, The Science of the total environment.

[10]  Rikard Levin,et al.  Adequacy Conditions for Reporting Uncertainty in Chemical Risk Assessments , 2006 .

[11]  Edmund A. C. Crouch,et al.  Quantitative risk assessment of stack emissions from municipal waste combustors , 1996 .

[12]  Grinding Facility,et al.  Office Of Air Quality Planning And Standards , 1976 .

[13]  Robin A. Brightbill,et al.  Total mercury and methylmercury in fish fillets, water, and bed sediments from selected streams in the Delaware River basin, New Jersery, New York, and Pennsylvania, 1998-2001 , 2004 .

[14]  W. H. Wischmeier,et al.  Predicting rainfall erosion losses : a guide to conservation planning , 1978 .

[15]  L Fradkin,et al.  Comparative analysis of health risk assessments for municipal waste combustors. , 1991, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[16]  William E. Kastenberg,et al.  A multimedia, multiple pathway risk assessment of atrazine: the impact of age differentiated exposure including joint uncertainty and variability , 1999 .

[17]  George E. P. Box,et al.  Empirical Model‐Building and Response Surfaces , 1988 .

[18]  Cristina Branquinho,et al.  Biomonitoring spatial and temporal impact of atmospheric dust from a cement industry. , 2008, Environmental pollution.

[19]  Anna Maria Jönsson,et al.  Framing Environmental Risks in the Baltic Sea: A News Media Analysis , 2011, AMBIO.