Effect of Time-of-Flight Information on PET/MR Reconstruction Artifacts: Comparison of Free-breathing versus Breath-hold MR-based Attenuation Correction.

Purpose To evaluate the magnitude and anatomic extent of the artifacts introduced on positron emission tomographic (PET)/magnetic resonance (MR) images by respiratory state mismatch in the attenuation map. Materials and Methods The method was tested on 14 patients referred for an oncologic examination who underwent PET/MR imaging. The acquisition included standard PET and MR series for each patient, and an additional attenuation correction series was acquired by using breath hold. PET data were reconstructed with and without time-of-flight (TOF) information, first by using the standard free-breathing attenuation map and then again by using the additional breath-hold map. Two-tailed paired t testing and linear regression with 0 intercept was performed on TOF versus non-TOF and free-breathing versus breath-hold data for all detected lesions. Results Fluorodeoxyglucose-avid lesions were found in eight of the 14 patients included in the study. The uptake differences (maximum standardized uptake values) between PET reconstructions with free-breathing versus breath-hold attenuation ranged, for non-TOF reconstructions, from -18% to 26%. The corresponding TOF reconstructions yielded differences from -15% to 18%. Conclusion TOF information was shown to reduce the artifacts caused at PET/MR by respiratory mismatch between emission and attenuation data. © RSNA, 2016 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

[1]  M. Conti Why is TOF PET reconstruction a more robust method in the presence of inconsistent data? , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[2]  S. Thiruvenkadam,et al.  Comparison of 4-class and continuous fat/water methods for whole-body, MR-based PET attenuation correction , 2012, 2012 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference Record (NSS/MIC).

[3]  H. Zaidi,et al.  Impact of Time-of-Flight PET on Quantification Errors in MR Imaging–Based Attenuation Correction , 2015, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[4]  J. Karp,et al.  Improvement in Lesion Detection with Whole-Body Oncologic Time-of-Flight PET , 2011, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[5]  D. Townsend,et al.  An Assessment of the Impact of Incorporating Time-of-Flight Information into Clinical PET/CT Imaging , 2010, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[6]  Craig S. Levin,et al.  Prototype time-of-flight PET ring integrated with a 3T MRI system for simultaneous whole-body PET/MR imaging , 2013 .

[7]  G Antoch,et al.  Positron emission tomography (PET) attenuation correction artefacts in PET/CT and PET/MRI. , 2013, The British journal of radiology.

[8]  R. Castillo,et al.  Attenuation correction of PET images with respiration-averaged CT images in PET/CT. , 2005, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[9]  Suleman Surti,et al.  Update on Time-of-Flight PET Imaging , 2015, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[10]  D. Townsend,et al.  Impact of Time-of-Flight on PET Tumor Detection , 2009, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[11]  Paul Kinahan,et al.  Cine CT for Attenuation Correction in Cardiac PET/CT , 2007, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[12]  G. Mok,et al.  Performance evaluation of interpolated average CT for PET attenuation correction in different lesion characteristics , 2015, 2013 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (2013 NSS/MIC).

[13]  Gaspar Delso,et al.  Incorporation of Time-of-Flight Information Reduces Metal Artifacts in Simultaneous Positron Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Simulation Study , 2015, Investigative radiology.

[14]  Bruce R. Rosen,et al.  Whole-body FDG PET-MR oncologic imaging: pitfalls in clinical interpretation related to inaccurate MR-based attenuation correction , 2015, Abdominal Imaging.

[15]  Nassir Navab,et al.  Tissue Classification as a Potential Approach for Attenuation Correction in Whole-Body PET/MRI: Evaluation with PET/CT Data , 2009, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[16]  Paul K Marsden,et al.  PET-MRI: a review of challenges and solutions in the development of integrated multimodality imaging , 2015, Physics in medicine and biology.

[17]  Craig Levin,et al.  The potential of TOF PET-MRI for reducing artifacts in PET images , 2015, EJNMMI Physics.

[18]  M. Foresta,et al.  Silicon Photomultipliers (SiPM) as novel photodetectors for PET , 2011 .

[19]  H. Zaidi,et al.  An outlook on future design of hybrid PET/MRI systems. , 2011, Medical physics.

[20]  R. Günther,et al.  Automatic, three-segment, MR-based attenuation correction for whole-body PET/MR data , 2010, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[21]  M. V. van Herk,et al.  Clinical evaluation of respiration-induced attenuation uncertainties in pulmonary 3D PET/CT , 2015, EJNMMI Physics.