Interface dimensions of CEREC-2 MOD inlays.

OBJECTIVES To quantify the width of the cement interface between ceramic inlays generated by the CEREC-2 CAD-CAM system and the tooth, and to determine the effect of cement viscosity on the interface width. METHODS Standardised MOD cavities were cut in 15 human premolar teeth using a custom paralleling device. A ceramic inlay was made with a CEREC-2 CAD-CAM machine for each tooth. The inlays were cemented using one of three resin-based composite systems of varying viscosity; a hybrid microfilled posterior composite, a compomer restorative and a dual-cure luting composite. The teeth were subsequently sectioned and measurements were taken at 21 key points with the aid of an image-analysis light microscopy system. RESULTS Statistical significance tests were applied to examine for difference in interface dimensions at specific points within each of the cement-groups and amongst groups. The interface space at the occlusal walls has a distinct wedge shape, being narrower at the external interface (50 microns, SD 15) than internally (211 microns, SD 38). There is no statistically significant difference in the interface dimensions of the gingival floor between the boxes that lie above and below the CEJ. There is no statistically significant difference in the width of the interface at any given point between the three cement groups. SIGNIFICANCE There is a significant improvement in the fit of CEREC-2 restorations when compared with the original CEREC system. Cements of varying viscosity (within the measured range) may be used for cementation of these inlays, without adversely affecting the width of the interface. Caution must be exercised with light-activated composite cements to ensure adequate transmission of light through the ceramic and the underlying composite cement.

[1]  C. Davidson,et al.  Setting Stress in Composite Resin in Relation to Configuration of the Restoration , 1987, Journal of dental research.

[2]  B. Lang,et al.  A regression analysis of filler particle content to predict composite wear. , 1997, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[3]  K. Warren.  An investigation into the microhardness of a light cured composite when cured through varying thicknesses of porcelain. , 1990, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[4]  K. Leinfelder,et al.  Effect of gap dimension on wear resistance of luting agents. , 1995, American journal of dentistry.

[5]  C. Davidson,et al.  Marginal Sealing of Curing Contraction Gaps in Class V Composite Resin Restorations , 1988, Journal of dental research.

[6]  K F Leinfelder,et al.  Effect of gap dimension on composite resin cement wear. , 1994, Quintessence international.

[7]  A. Feilzer,et al.  Increased Wall-to-Wall Curing Contraction in Thin Bonded Resin Layers , 1989, Journal of dental research.

[8]  J L Ferracane,et al.  In vitro Wear of Composite with Varied Cure, Filler Level, and Filler Treatment , 1997, Journal of dental research.

[9]  K F Leinfelder,et al.  Evaluating CAD-CAM generated ceramic veneers. , 1993, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[10]  J F Roulet,et al.  Marginal adaptation of four tooth-coloured inlay systems in vivo. , 1992, Journal of dentistry.

[11]  F. Barbakow,et al.  Chairside computer-aided direct ceramic inlays. , 1989, Quintessence international.

[12]  E. Duke,et al.  Influence of ceramic thickness on the polymerization of light-cured resin cement. , 1990, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[13]  N Martin.  Materials and interfaces in computer-machined ceramic dental restorations. , 1996 .

[14]  Rekow Ed.  A review of the developments in dental CAD/CAM systems. , 1992 .

[15]  P. L. Pease,et al.  Variables affecting the spectral transmittance of light through porcelain veneer samples. , 1991, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[16]  F Lutz,et al.  Marginal adaptation and fit of adhesive ceramic inlays. , 1993, Journal of dentistry.

[17]  R. Strang,et al.  Laboratory studies of visible-light cured fissure sealants: setting times and depth of polymerization. , 1986, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[18]  W. Mörmann,et al.  [The curing of composites under Cerec inlays]. , 1995, Schweizer Monatsschrift fur Zahnmedizin = Revue mensuelle suisse d'odonto-stomatologie = Rivista mensile svizzera di odontologia e stomatologia.

[19]  John Calamia,et al.  Clinical-evaluation of etched porcelain laminate veneers - results at (6 months 3 years) , 1987 .

[20]  W H Mörmann,et al.  [Grinding precision and accuracy of the fit of Cerec-2 CAD/CIM inlays]. , 1995, Schweizer Monatsschrift fur Zahnmedizin = Revue mensuelle suisse d'odonto-stomatologie = Rivista mensile svizzera di odontologia e stomatologia.

[21]  I Krejci,et al.  Computer-designed inlays after 5 years in situ: clinical performance and scanning electron microscopic evaluation. , 1992, Quintessence international.