Spectrotemporal Modulation Detection and Speech Perception by Cochlear Implant Users

Spectrotemporal modulation (STM) detection performance was examined for cochlear implant (CI) users. The test involved discriminating between an unmodulated steady noise and a modulated stimulus. The modulated stimulus presents frequency modulation patterns that change in frequency over time. In order to examine STM detection performance for different modulation conditions, two different temporal modulation rates (5 and 10 Hz) and three different spectral modulation densities (0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 cycles/octave) were employed, producing a total 6 different STM stimulus conditions. In order to explore how electric hearing constrains STM sensitivity for CI users differently from acoustic hearing, normal-hearing (NH) and hearing-impaired (HI) listeners were also tested on the same tasks. STM detection performance was best in NH subjects, followed by HI subjects. On average, CI subjects showed poorest performance, but some CI subjects showed high levels of STM detection performance that was comparable to acoustic hearing. Significant correlations were found between STM detection performance and speech identification performance in quiet and in noise. In order to understand the relative contribution of spectral and temporal modulation cues to speech perception abilities for CI users, spectral and temporal modulation detection was performed separately and related to STM detection and speech perception performance. The results suggest that that slow spectral modulation rather than slow temporal modulation may be important for determining speech perception capabilities for CI users. Lastly, test–retest reliability for STM detection was good with no learning. The present study demonstrates that STM detection may be a useful tool to evaluate the ability of CI sound processing strategies to deliver clinically pertinent acoustic modulation information.

[1]  Jong Ho Won,et al.  Spectral-Ripple Resolution Correlates with Speech Reception in Noise in Cochlear Implant Users , 2007, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[2]  S. Shamma,et al.  Spectro-temporal modulation transfer functions and speech intelligibility. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  Mounya Elhilali,et al.  A spectro-temporal modulation index (STMI) for assessment of speech intelligibility , 2003, Speech Commun..

[4]  Andrew J Oxenham,et al.  Assessing the role of spectral and intensity cues in spectral ripple detection and discrimination in cochlear-implant users. , 2012, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  N. Viemeister Temporal modulation transfer functions based upon modulation thresholds. , 1979, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  Dirk Van Compernolle,et al.  Pitch perception by cochlear implant subjects. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  Q. Fu Temporal processing and speech recognition in cochlear implant users , 2002, Neuroreport.

[8]  Ying-Yee Kong,et al.  Limits of temporal pitch in cochlear implants. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  Ning Zhou,et al.  Cochlear infrastructure for electrical hearing , 2011, Hearing Research.

[10]  Jae Chul Yoo,et al.  Comparison Analysis between Korean Central Institute for the Deaf Sentence and Korean Hearing in Noise Test Sentence , 2012 .

[11]  Jong Ho Won,et al.  Relationship between channel interaction and spectral-ripple discrimination in cochlear implant users. , 2011, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  Frederick J Gallun,et al.  Spectrotemporal modulation sensitivity as a predictor of speech intelligibility for hearing-impaired listeners. , 2013, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[13]  Michelle L Hughes,et al.  Effect of Stimulus and Recording Parameters on Spatial Spread of Excitation and Masking Patterns Obtained With the Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential in Cochlear Implants , 2010, Ear and hearing.

[14]  Jong Ho Won,et al.  Acoustic temporal modulation detection and speech perception in cochlear implant listeners. , 2011, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  Jong Ho Won,et al.  Relationship among the physiologic channel interactions, spectral-ripple discrimination, and vowel identification in cochlear implant users. , 2014, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  R. Shannon Temporal modulation transfer functions in patients with cochlear implants. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  Bryan E Pfingst,et al.  Across-site patterns of modulation detection: relation to speech recognition. , 2012, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  Jong Ho Won,et al.  Evidence of across-channel processing for spectral-ripple discrimination in cochlear implant listeners. , 2011, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  B C Moore,et al.  Temporal modulation transfer functions obtained using sinusoidal carriers with normally hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  N. Viemeister,et al.  Temporal modulation transfer functions in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. , 1985, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[21]  Belinda A Henry,et al.  The resolution of complex spectral patterns by cochlear implant and normal-hearing listeners. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[22]  Fan-Gang Zeng,et al.  Cochlear Implants: System Design, Integration, and Evaluation , 2008, IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering.

[23]  Olga N. Milekhina,et al.  Frequency resolving power measured by rippled noise , 1994, Hearing Research.

[24]  Blake S. Wilson,et al.  Cochlear implants: A remarkable past and a brilliant future , 2008, Hearing Research.

[25]  David A Eddins,et al.  Spectral modulation detection as a function of modulation frequency, carrier bandwidth, and carrier frequency region. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[26]  M Pelizzone,et al.  Low-pass filtering in amplitude modulation detection associated with vowel and consonant identification in subjects with cochlear implants. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[27]  Anthony J Spahr,et al.  Spectral modulation detection and vowel and consonant identifications in cochlear implant listeners. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[28]  John C Middlebrooks Cochlear-implant high pulse rate and narrow electrode configuration impair transmission of temporal information to the auditory cortex. , 2008, Journal of neurophysiology.

[29]  Dan Gnansia,et al.  Temporal-Envelope Reconstruction for Hearing-Impaired Listeners , 2012, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[30]  Christian Füllgrabe,et al.  Effect of cochlear damage on the detection of complex temporal envelopes , 2003, Hearing Research.

[31]  Ting Zhang,et al.  Relationship Between Auditory Function of Nonimplanted Ears and Bimodal Benefit , 2013, Ear and hearing.

[32]  Jong Ho Won,et al.  Maximizing the Spectral and Temporal Benefits of Two Clinically Used Sound Processing Strategies for Cochlear Implants , 2012, Trends in amplification.

[33]  Heather A. Kreft,et al.  Comparing spatial tuning curves, spectral ripple resolution, and speech perception in cochlear implant users. , 2011, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[34]  Dan Gnansia,et al.  Role of slow temporal modulations in speech identification for cochlear implant users , 2014, International journal of audiology.

[35]  Yun-Hoon Choung,et al.  The Korean Hearing in Noise Test , 2008, International journal of audiology.

[36]  H. Levitt Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[37]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing , 1995 .

[38]  Deniz Başkent,et al.  Speech recognition in normal hearing and sensorineural hearing loss as a function of the number of spectral channels. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[39]  Jong Ho Won,et al.  Use of Amplitude Modulation Cues Recovered from Frequency Modulation for Cochlear Implant Users When Original Speech Cues Are Severely Degraded , 2014, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[40]  Jong Ho Won,et al.  Detection of acoustic temporal fine structure by cochlear implant listeners: Behavioral results and computational modeling , 2013, Hearing Research.

[41]  R. Shannon,et al.  Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[42]  Belinda A Henry,et al.  Spectral peak resolution and speech recognition in quiet: normal hearing, hearing impaired, and cochlear implant listeners. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[43]  Jong Ho Won,et al.  Sensitivity of psychophysical measures to signal processor modifications in cochlear implant users , 2010, Hearing Research.

[44]  Anthony J Spahr,et al.  Relationship between perception of spectral ripple and speech recognition in cochlear implant and vocoder listeners. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[45]  Frederick J. Gallun,et al.  Spectrotemporal modulation sensitivity for hearing-impaired listeners: dependence on carrier center frequency and the relationship to speech intelligibility. , 2014, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.