Benefits realization from IS/IT investments : a perspective from ERP systems

Delivery of benefits from many ERP systems remains disappointingly low. The high investment in ERP systems means that realizing benefits from these implementations is of critical importance to many organizations. Thus, the main aim this research is to develop insights that can help organizations to improve benefits realization from ERP systems. In doing so, this study is not only evaluating the benefits gained by different organizations, but it is also analysing the key activities that are deemed necessary for benefits realization. This research was conducted in two phases to explore the research objectives. The initial phase was conducted with a selection of stakeholders working in the ERP industry to gather insights concerning the adoption of benefits management approaches and the relationship between ERP customization and benefits realization. The second phase comprised of three in-depth case studies that investigated the activities that were necessary to realize benefits from ERP projects. The research provides a number of important contributions to the academic literature. With respect to the adoption of benefits management (BM) approaches, this research contributes by providing empirical insights about what organizations are actually doing to manage benefits. More specifically, the study provides evidence to suggest that organizations have an increased chance of realizing benefits if they develop localized BM approaches based on organizational needs and context. This study also highlights the role of organisational change in facilitating the realisation of business benefits, in the context of ERP projects. Another important contribution is an attempt in establishing of relationship between different types of customizations and the resultant benefits. The study also contributes by indicating that organizations, in the very particular context of ERP projects, can identify the additional un-planned benefits during the use of the system. This study makes another important new contribution to the literature, by demonstrating the importance of tackling any organizational inhibitors in order to realize maximum benefits at various stages of ERP systems life cycle. Finally, with respect to the evaluation of ERP systems, this research contributes by providing interpretive evaluation of operational ERP systems to explore the process of how benefits were realised, in the participating organizations. It is envisaged that interpretive evaluation will fuel the insights that will maximize the attaining of benefits from ERP implementations.

[1]  Andrew Stein,et al.  Revisiting ERP systems: benefit realization , 2004, 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2004. Proceedings of the.

[2]  M. Markus,et al.  The Enterprise System Experience— From Adoption to Success , 2000 .

[3]  D. Gefen,et al.  Nurturing clients’ trust to encourage engagement success during the customization of ERP systems , 2002 .

[4]  N. Hoffart Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory , 2000 .

[5]  S. Foster Doing business research: a guide to theory and practice , 2012 .

[6]  Sia Siew Kien,et al.  An institutional perspective on sources of ERP package-organisation misalignments , 2004, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[7]  Derrick E. D'Souza,et al.  International Journal of Information Management the Influence of Erp System Implementation on the Operational Performance of an Organization , 2022 .

[8]  Birger Rapp,et al.  Relationships among ERP post-implementation success constructs: An analysis at the organizational level , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[9]  Zahir Irani,et al.  Information systems evaluation: navigating through the problem domain , 2002, Inf. Manag..

[10]  Richard E. Morehouse,et al.  Beginning Qualitative Research: A Philosophical and Practical Guide , 1994 .

[11]  Robert W. Proctor,et al.  Qualitative Research Methods , 2008 .

[12]  Chyan Yang,et al.  Production , Manufacturing and Logistics Why are enterprise resource planning systems indispensable to supply chain management ? , 2009 .

[13]  Jeanne W. Ross,et al.  Learning to Implement Enterprise Systems: An Exploratory Study of the Dialectics of Change , 2002, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[14]  R. Rapoport Three Dilemmas in Action Research , 1970 .

[15]  Brian L. Dos Santos,et al.  Improving the return on IT investment: the productivity paradox , 2000, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[16]  Petri T. Helo,et al.  Expectation and reality in ERP implementation: consultant and solution provider perspective , 2008, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[17]  Robyn Thomas,et al.  Managing Organizational Change: Negotiating Meaning and Power-Resistance Relations , 2011, Organ. Sci..

[18]  Jeanne W. Ross,et al.  The ERP Revolution: Surviving vs. Thriving , 2000, Inf. Syst. Frontiers.

[19]  Mark N. Frolick,et al.  Erp Implementation Failure: A Case Study , 2003, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[20]  Ben Light,et al.  Going beyond 'misfit' as a reason for ERP package customisation , 2005, Comput. Ind..

[21]  K. D. Joshi,et al.  Process and reality in information systems benefit analysis , 1998, Inf. Syst. J..

[22]  Ben Light,et al.  Beyond Enterprise Resource Planning Projects: Innovative Strategies forCompetitive Advantage , 1999, ECIS.

[23]  Chris W. Clegg,et al.  Information technology: a study of performance and the role of human and organizational factors , 1997 .

[24]  Peter Booth,et al.  The impact of ERP systems on firm and business process performance , 2006, J. Enterp. Inf. Manag..

[25]  Robin S. Poston,et al.  Financial impacts of enterprise resource planning implementations , 2001, Int. J. Account. Inf. Syst..

[26]  R. Kaplan,et al.  The balanced scorecard--measures that drive performance. , 2015, Harvard business review.

[27]  D. Morgan,et al.  Sociological Paradigms and Organizational Analysis. , 1983 .

[28]  T. Ramayah,et al.  Enterprise resource planning (ERP) benefits survey of Indian manufacturing firms: An empirical analysis of SAP versus Oracle package , 2011, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[29]  E. Brynjolfsson,et al.  Computing Productivity: Firm-Level Evidence , 2003, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[30]  Steven Jones,et al.  Understanding IS evaluation as a complex social process: a case study of a UK local authority , 2001, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[31]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable , 1992, Inf. Syst. Res..

[32]  Roger Elvin,et al.  A new framework for managing IT‐enabled business change , 1999, Inf. Syst. J..

[33]  Pernille Kræmmergaard,et al.  A comprehensive literature review of the ERP research field over a decade , 2010, J. Enterp. Inf. Manag..

[34]  Gerold Riempp,et al.  Benefits Management - A Literature Review and Elements of a Research Agenda , 2009, Wirtschaftsinformatik.

[35]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Interpreting Information Systems in Organizations , 1993 .

[36]  Margaret Kiley,et al.  'It's a PhD, not a Nobel Prize': How experienced examiners assess research theses , 2002 .

[37]  M. D. Myers,et al.  A disaster for everyone to see: An interpretive analysis of a failed is project , 1994 .

[38]  Oana Velcu,et al.  Strategic alignment of ERP implementation stages: An empirical investigation , 2010, Inf. Manag..

[39]  R. Bernstein,et al.  The restructuring of social and political theory , 1977 .

[40]  T. Davenport Putting the enterprise into the enterprise system. , 1998, Harvard business review.

[41]  Angappa Gunasekaran,et al.  Application of SAP R/3 in on-line inventory control , 2002 .

[42]  Vidyaranya B. Gargeya,et al.  Success and failure factors of adopting SAP in ERP system implementation , 2005, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[43]  B. Berg Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences , 1989 .

[44]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Studying Information Technology in Organizations: Research Approaches and Assumptions , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[45]  Barbara Ebert,et al.  Research information systems at universities and research institutions - Position Paper of DINI AG FIS , 2015 .

[46]  Louis Raymond,et al.  Linking the Effects of ERP to Organizational Performance: Development and Initial Validation of an Evaluation Method , 2010, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[47]  Andreas I. Nicolaou Quality of postimplementation review for enterprise resource planning systems , 2004, Int. J. Account. Inf. Syst..

[48]  K. Eisenhardt Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[49]  José Esteves,et al.  A benefits realisation road-map framework for ERP usage in small and medium-sized enterprises , 2009, J. Enterp. Inf. Manag..

[50]  Peter B. Seddon,et al.  A Multi-Project Model of Key Factors Affecting Organizational Benefits from Enterprise Systems , 2010, MIS Q..

[51]  John S. Oakland,et al.  Production and Operations Management , 1992 .

[52]  M. Morton,et al.  The Transforming Power of Complementary Assets , 2006 .

[53]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Improvising Organizational Transformation Over Time: A Situated Change Perspective , 1996, Inf. Syst. Res..

[54]  Neil F. Doherty,et al.  The consideration of organizational issues during the systems development process: An empirical analysis , 1998, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[55]  Fiona Fui-Hoon Nah,et al.  ERP Implementation: Chief Information Officers' Perceptions of Critical Success Factors , 2003, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[56]  J. Ward,et al.  Evaluation and realisation of IS/IT benefits: an empirical study of current practice , 1996 .

[57]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  Information Systems Failure , 2010 .

[58]  Abdullah S. Al-Mudimigh,et al.  ERP software implementation: an integrative framework , 2001, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..