Turbulence Modeling Effects on the CFD Predictions of Flow over a Detailed Full-Scale Sedan Vehicle

In today’s road vehicle design processes, Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) has emerged as one of the major investigative tools for aerodynamics analyses. The age-old CFD methodology based on the Reynolds Averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) approach is still considered as the most popular turbulence modeling approach in automotive industries due to its acceptable accuracy and affordable computational cost for predicting flows involving complex geometries. This popular use of RANS still persists in spite of the well-known fact that, for automotive flows, RANS turbulence models often fail to characterize the associated flow-field properly. It is even true that more often, the RANS approach fails to predict correct integral aerodynamic quantities like lift, drag, or moment coefficients, and as such, they are used to assess the relative magnitude and direction of a trend. Moreover, even for such purposes, notable disagreements generally exist between results predicted by different RANS models. Thanks to fast advances in computer technology, increasing popularity has been seen in the use of the hybrid Detached Eddy Simulation (DES), which blends the RANS approach with Large Eddy Simulation (LES). The DES methodology demonstrated a high potential of being more accurate and informative than the RANS approaches. Whilst evaluations of RANS and DES models on various applications are abundant in the literature, such evaluations on full-car models are relatively fewer. In this study, four RANS models that are widely used in engineering applications, i.e., the realizable k - ε two-layer, Abe–Kondoh–Nagano (AKN) k - ε low-Reynolds, SST k - ω , and V2F are evaluated on a full-scale passenger vehicle with two different front-end configurations. In addition, both cases are run with two DES models to assess the differences between the flow predictions obtained using RANS and DES.

[1]  P. Spalart.  Comments on the feasibility of LES for wings, and on a hybrid RANS/LES approach , 1997 .

[2]  T. Shih,et al.  A new k-ϵ eddy viscosity model for high reynolds number turbulent flows , 1995 .

[3]  W. Jones,et al.  The prediction of laminarization with a two-equation model of turbulence , 1972 .

[4]  P. Spalart,et al.  A hybrid RANS-LES approach with delayed-DES and wall-modelled LES capabilities , 2008 .

[5]  Ken-ichi Abe,et al.  A new turbulence model for predicting fluid flow and heat transfer in separating and reattaching flows—I. Flow field calculations , 1995 .

[6]  D. Wilcox.  Reassessment of the scale-determining equation for advanced turbulence models , 1988 .

[7]  Mesbah Uddin,et al.  Turbulence Models and Model Closure Coefficients Sensitivity of NASCAR Racecar RANS CFD Aerodynamic Predictions , 2017 .

[8]  P. Durbin.  Near-wall turbulence closure modeling without “damping functions” , 1991, Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics.

[9]  Mesbah Uddin,et al.  Simulating DrivAer with Structured Finite Difference Overset Grids , 2015 .

[10]  Peter V. Nielsen,et al.  Modifications of the v2-f Model for Computing the Flow in a 3D Wall Jet , 2003 .

[11]  P. Spalart,et al.  A New Version of Detached-eddy Simulation, Resistant to Ambiguous Grid Densities , 2006 .

[12]  Emmanuel Guilmineau.  Numerical Simulations of Flow around a Realistic Generic Car Model , 2014 .

[13]  Gunther Ramm,et al.  Some salient features of the time - averaged ground vehicle wake , 1984 .

[14]  E. Serre,et al.  High-order large-eddy simulation of flow over the “Ahmed body” car model , 2008 .

[15]  Philippe R. Spalart,et al.  Detached-eddy simulation of an airfoil at high angle of attack , 1999 .

[16]  Alistair Revell,et al.  Key factors in the use of DDES for the flow around a simplified car , 2015 .

[17]  F. Menter.  Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications , 1994 .

[18]  B. Launder,et al.  Application of the energy-dissipation model of turbulence to the calculation of flow near a spinning disc , 1974 .

[19]  Branislav Basara,et al.  Computational Study of the Aerodynamics of a Realistic Car Model by Means of RANS and Hybrid RANS/LES Approaches , 2014 .

[20]  R Spalart Philippe,et al.  Young-Person''s Guide to Detached-Eddy Simulation Grids , 2001 .

[21]  P. Durbin.  SEPARATED FLOW COMPUTATIONS WITH THE K-E-V2 MODEL , 1995 .

[22]  M Giannuzzi,et al.  Low Reynolds turbulence model CFD simulation for complex electronic system: an industrial point of view , 2014 .

[23]  Emmanuel Guilmineau,et al.  Computational study of flow around a simplified car body , 2008 .

[24]  Alistair Revell,et al.  Comparison of RANS and DES Methods for the DrivAer Automotive Body , 2015 .

[25]  D. Wilcox.  Formulation of the k-w Turbulence Model Revisited , 2008 .

[26]  N. C. Markatos,et al.  Recent advances on the numerical modelling of turbulent flows , 2015 .

[27]  Alistair Revell,et al.  Assessment of RANS and DES methods for realistic automotive models , 2016 .

[28]  Nikolaus A. Adams,et al.  Introduction of a New Realistic Generic Car Model for Aerodynamic Investigations , 2012 .

[29]  Nikolaus A. Adams,et al.  Investigation of Unsteady Flow Structures in the Wake of a Realistic Generic Car Model , 2011 .

[30]  P. Durbin.  On the k-3 stagnation point anomaly , 1996 .

[31]  F. Menter,et al.  Ten Years of Industrial Experience with the SST Turbulence Model , 2003 .

[32]  Nikolaus A. Adams,et al.  Experimental and Numerical Investigation of the DrivAer Model , 2012 .

[33]  M. S. Gritskevich,et al.  Development of DDES and IDDES Formulations for the k-ω Shear Stress Transport Model , 2012 .

[34]  T. Han,et al.  Computational analysis of three-dimensional turbulent flow around a bluff body in ground proximity , 1988 .

[35]  M. Pourquié,et al.  Large eddy simulation of an Ahmed reference model , 2002 .

[36]  Florian R. Menter,et al.  Review of the shear-stress transport turbulence model experience from an industrial perspective , 2009 .

[37]  M. Uddin,et al.  Simultaneous Improvement of Vehicle Under-Hood Airflow and Cooling Drag Using 3D CFD Simulation , 2016 .

[38]  Mesbah Uddin,et al.  Turbulence modeling effects on the aerodynamic characterizations of a NASCAR Generation 6 racecar subject to yaw and pitch changes , 2019, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: Journal of Automobile Engineering.

[39]  M. Wolfshtein.  The velocity and temperature distribution in one-dimensional flow with turbulence augmentation and pressure gradient , 1969 .

[40]  Patrick Gilliéron,et al.  Modelling of stationary three-dimensional separated air flows around an Ahmed reference model , 1999 .

[41]  P. Queutey,et al.  Assessment of hybrid RANS-LES formulations for flow simulation around the Ahmed body , 2017, Computers & Fluids.