Computational and Biological Analogies for Understanding Fine-Tuned Parameters in Physics

In this philosophical paper, we explore computational and biological analogies to address the fine-tuning problem in cosmology. We first clarify what it means for physical constants or initial conditions to be fine-tuned. We review important distinctions such as the dimensionless and dimensional physical constants, and the classification of constants proposed by Lévy-Leblond. Then we explore how two great analogies, computational and biological, can give new insights into our problem. This paper includes a preliminary study to examine the two analogies. Importantly, analogies are both useful and fundamental cognitive tools, but can also be misused or misinterpreted. The idea that our universe might be modelled as a computational entity is analysed, and we discuss the distinction between physical laws and initial conditions using algorithmic information theory. Smolin introduced the theory of “Cosmological Natural Selection” with a biological analogy in mind. We examine an extension of this analogy involving intelligent life. We discuss if and how this extension could be legitimated.

[1]  L. A. Jeffress Cerebral mechanisms in behavior : the Hixon symposium , 1951 .

[2]  J. Stamm Cerebral Mechanisms in Behavior, The Hixon Symposium , 1952 .

[3]  J. Neumann The General and Logical Theory of Au-tomata , 1963 .

[4]  M. Bunge Problems in the foundations of physics , 1971 .

[5]  Ervin Laszlo,et al.  Introduction to Systems Philosophy - Toward a New Paradigm of Contemporary Thought , 1972 .

[6]  Gregory J. Chaitin,et al.  Information-Theoretic Limitations of Formal Systems , 1974, JACM.

[7]  Gregory J. Chaitin,et al.  Algorithmic Information Theory , 1987, IBM J. Res. Dev..

[8]  PHYSICS OF OUR DAYS: Physical laws and the numerical values of fundamental constants , 1980 .

[9]  Paul Davies,et al.  The Accidental Universe , 1982 .

[10]  J. Barrow,et al.  The Anthropic Cosmological Principle , 1987 .

[11]  Gregory. J. Chaitin,et al.  Algorithmic information theory , 1987, Cambridge tracts in theoretical computer science.

[12]  Paul Davies,et al.  The cosmic blueprint , 1988 .

[13]  Cosmic Coincidences: Dark Matter, Mankind, and Anthropic Cosmology , 1989 .

[14]  G. Reeke Marvin Minsky, The Society of Mind , 1991, Artif. Intell..

[15]  L. Smolin Did the Universe Evolve , 1992 .

[16]  Dedre Gentner,et al.  The shift from metaphor to analogy in western science , 1993 .

[17]  K. Holyoak,et al.  Mental Leaps: Analogy in Creative Thought , 1994 .

[18]  Possible Implications of the Quantum Theory of Gravity: An Introduction to the Meduso-Anthropic Principle , 1994, hep-th/9402104.

[19]  Christian de Duve,et al.  Vital Dust Life As A Cosmic Imperative , 1995, Nature Medicine.

[20]  Emily Harrison,et al.  The Natural Selection of Universes Containing Intelligent Life , 1995 .

[21]  Iris Fry Are the different hypotheses on the emergence of life as different as they seem? , 1995 .

[22]  The Unconscious Quantum: Metaphysics in Modern Physics and Cosmology , 1995 .

[23]  R. Hayward Metaphors in the history of psychology , 1996, Medical History.

[24]  Gregory Laughlin,et al.  A dying universe: the long-term fate and evolutionof astrophysical objects , 1997, astro-ph/9701131.

[25]  L. Smolin,et al.  The Life of the Cosmos , 1997 .

[26]  Modern cosmology & philosophy , 1998 .

[27]  F. Wilczek Quantum Field Theory , 1998, hep-th/9803075.

[28]  The price of an ultimate theory , 2000 .

[29]  V. Stenger Natural Explanations for the Anthropic Coincidences , 2000 .

[30]  C. Hogan Why the Universe is Just So , 1999, astro-ph/9909295.

[31]  M. Rees,et al.  Just Six Numbers: The Deep Forces that Shape the Universe , 2000 .

[32]  Before the Beginning: Cosmology Explained , 2000 .

[33]  James N. Gardner The selfish biocosm , 2000, Complex..

[34]  E. Chaisson Cosmic Evolution: The Rise of Complexity in Nature , 2001 .

[35]  N. Bostrom ARE YOU LIVING IN A COMPUTER SIMULATION ? , 2001 .

[36]  Cosmology, life, and the anthropic principle. , 2001, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[37]  Cold big-bang cosmology as a counterexample to several anthropic arguments , 2001, astro-ph/0106143.

[38]  N. Bostrom Anthropic Bias: Observation Selection Effects in Science and Philosophy , 2002 .

[39]  Berndt Muller The Anthropic Principle Revisited , 2001, astro-ph/0108259.

[40]  Trialogue on the number of fundamental constants , 2001, physics/0110060.

[41]  Comment on time-variation of fundamental constants , 2002, hep-th/0208093.

[42]  Resource Letter: PEs-1: Physical eschatology , 2002, astro-ph/0211413.

[43]  Stephen Wolfram,et al.  A New Kind of Science , 2003, Artificial Life.

[44]  Is there a Darwinian Evolution of the Cosmos? - Some Comments on Lee Smolin's Theory of the Origin of Universes by Means of Natural Selection , 2002, gr-qc/0205119.

[45]  N. Bostrom Are We Living in a Computer Simulation , 2003 .

[46]  F. Kitsell Commentary on this paper , 2003 .

[47]  L. Nottale Scale-relativistic cosmology , 2003 .

[48]  L. Smolin Scientific alternatives to the anthropic principle , 2004, hep-th/0407213.

[49]  N. Tyson The importance of being constant , 2004 .

[50]  E. Chaisson Epic of Evolution: Seven Ages of the Cosmos , 2005 .

[51]  Leonard Susskind,et al.  The Cosmic Landscape: String Theory and the Illusion of Intelligent Design , 2005 .

[52]  S. Carroll Endless forms most beautiful : the new science of evo devo and the making of the animal kingdom , 2005 .

[53]  The cosmological replication cycle, the extraterrestrial paradigm and the final anthropic principle , 2005 .

[54]  S. Lloyd Programming the Universe: A Quantum Computer Scientist Takes on the Cosmos , 2006 .

[55]  G. Ellis Issues in the Philosophy of Cosmology , 2006, astro-ph/0602280.

[56]  Review of Leonard Susskind "The Cosmic Landscape: String Theory and the Illusion of Intelligent Design , 2006 .

[57]  F. Wilczek,et al.  Dimensionless constants, cosmology and other dark matters , 2005, astro-ph/0511774.

[58]  Charles L. Harper,et al.  Fitness of the Cosmos for Life: Biochemistry and Fine-Tuning , 2007 .

[59]  G. Ellis,et al.  Universe or Multiverse , 2009 .

[60]  P. Davies The Goldilocks Enigma: Why is the Universe Just Right for Life? , 2007 .

[61]  G. Ellis Universe or Multiverse?: Multiverses: description, uniqueness and testing , 2007 .

[62]  Universe or Multiverse?: The anthropic principle revisited , 2007 .

[63]  Marcus Hutter,et al.  Algorithmic Information Theory , 1977, IBM J. Res. Dev..

[64]  Clément Vidal,et al.  An Enduring Philosophical Agenda. Worldview Construction as a Philosophical Method , 2007 .

[65]  Clement Vidal,et al.  The Future of Scientific Simulations: from Artificial Life to Artificial Cosmogenesis. , 2008, 0803.1087.

[66]  G. Perez Multiverse universes with different physical laws might still be habitable , 2009 .

[67]  C. Auffray,et al.  The Evolution and Development of the Universe , 2009, 0912.5508.

[68]  T. Chalmers On Natural Theology , 2009 .

[69]  Laurent Nottale,et al.  Scale Relativity and Fractal Space-Time: Theory and Applications , 2008, 0812.3857.

[70]  G. Perez,et al.  Looking for life in the multiverse. , 2010, Scientific American.

[71]  G. Chaitin,et al.  Kolmogorov complexity , 2010 .

[72]  J. Stewart The Meaning of Life in a Developing Universe , 2010 .

[73]  On the Nature of Initial Conditions and Fundamental Parameters in Physics and Cosmology , 2012 .

[74]  R. Vaas Cosmological Artificial Selection: Creation out of Something? , 2012 .

[75]  C. Vidal Fine-Tuning, Quantum Mechanics and Cosmological Artificial Selection , 2012 .