Spanwise flow and the attachment of the leading-edge vortex on insect wings

The flow structure that is largely responsible for the good performance of insect wings has recently been identified as a leading-edge vortex. But because such vortices become detached from a wing in two-dimensional flow, an unknown mechanism must keep them attached to (three-dimensional) flapping wings. The current explanation, analogous to a mechanism operating on delta-wing aircraft, is that spanwise flow through a spiral vortex drains energy from the vortex core. We have tested this hypothesis by systematically mapping the flow generated by a dynamically scaled model insect while simultaneously measuring the resulting aerodynamic forces. Here we report that, at the Reynolds numbers matching the flows relevant for most insects, flapping wings do not generate a spiral vortex akin to that produced by delta-wing aircraft. We also find that limiting spanwise flow with fences and edge baffles does not cause detachment of the leading-edge vortex. The data support an alternative hypothesis—that downward flow induced by tip vortices limits the growth of the leading-edge vortex.

[1]  Turgut Sarpkaya,et al.  An inviscid model of two-dimensional vortex shedding for transient and asymptotically steady separated flow over an inclined plate , 1975, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[2]  Masaru Kiya,et al.  A contribution to an inviscid vortex-shedding model for an inclined flat plate in uniform flow , 1977, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[3]  H. Wolda,et al.  DIVERSITY OF INSECT FAUNAS , 1977 .

[4]  T. Maxworthy Experiments on the Weis-Fogh mechanism of lift generation by insects in hovering flight. Part 1. Dynamics of the ‘fling’ , 1979, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[5]  C. Ellington The Aerodynamics of Hovering Insect Flight. IV. Aeorodynamic Mechanisms , 1984 .

[6]  M. Dickinson,et al.  UNSTEADY AERODYNAMIC PERFORMANCE OF MODEL WINGS AT LOW REYNOLDS NUMBERS , 1993 .

[7]  Dickinson,et al.  THE EFFECTS OF WING ROTATION ON UNSTEADY AERODYNAMIC PERFORMANCE AT LOW REYNOLDS NUMBERS , 1994, The Journal of experimental biology.

[8]  Adrian L. R. Thomas,et al.  Leading-edge vortices in insect flight , 1996, Nature.

[9]  Shigeru Sunada,et al.  Airfoil Section Characteristics at a Low Reynolds Number , 1997 .

[10]  C. Ellington,et al.  The three–dimensional leading–edge vortex of a ‘hovering’ model hawkmoth , 1997 .

[11]  C. Ellington,et al.  The mechanics of flight in the hawkmoth Manduca sexta. II. Aerodynamic consequences of kinematic and morphological variation. , 1997, The Journal of experimental biology.

[12]  Adrian L. R. Thomas,et al.  FLOW VISUALIZATION AND UNSTEADY AERODYNAMICS IN THE FLIGHT OF THE HAWKMOTH, MANDUCA SEXTA , 1997 .

[13]  Ellington,et al.  A computational fluid dynamic study of hawkmoth hovering , 1998, The Journal of experimental biology.

[14]  R. Dudley The Biomechanics of Insect Flight: Form, Function, Evolution , 1999 .

[15]  M. Dickinson,et al.  Wing rotation and the aerodynamic basis of insect flight. , 1999, Science.

[16]  Z. J. Wang Two dimensional mechanism for insect hovering , 2000 .