A cost-analysis study of robotic versus conventional mitral valve repair.

BACKGROUND Robotic mitral valve repair has been performed in Australia since 2004. The aim of this study was to perform a cost-analysis of robotic mitral valve repair (MVR) with direct comparison to conventional MVR surgery. METHODS All isolated MVRs performed within one metropolitan hospital network, between June 2005 and June 2008, were retrospectively compared. Ad hoc cost analysis was conducted. RESULTS There were 107 robotic and 40 conventional MVRs performed. The post-operative degrees of mitral regurgitation were comparable. Total operating time was 18% longer in robotic compared to conventional (239 min vs. 202 min, p<0.001, 95% CI: 11-27%). In robotic, Intensive Care Unit stay was reduced by 19% (p=0.002, 37 h vs. 45 h), and length of hospital stay was reduced by 26% (p<0.001, 6.47 days vs. 8.76 days). Mean hospital cost, without including capital costs, was not significantly increased (AUD$18,503 vs. AUD$17,880 p=0.176, 95% CI: -282 to 1,530). CONCLUSIONS Robotic mitral repair can be performed with similar immediate repair success rates as conventional surgery with a shorter recovery time, but a slightly longer operative time. There is no significant increase in cost over conventional surgery.

[1]  W. Chitwood,et al.  Video-assisted minimally invasive mitral valve surgery: the "micro-mitral" operation. , 1997, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[2]  L. Nifong,et al.  Building a surgical robotics program. , 2004, American journal of surgery.

[3]  W. Chitwood,et al.  Minimally Invasive Videloscopic Mitral Valve Surgery: The Current Role of Surgical Robotics , 2000, Journal of cardiac surgery.

[4]  L. Cohn,et al.  Minimally invasive cardiac valve surgery improves patient satisfaction while reducing costs of cardiac valve replacement and repair. , 1997, Annals of surgery.

[5]  J. Morgan,et al.  Robotic valve surgery: how does the future look? , 2004, Advances in cardiology.

[6]  F. Casselman,et al.  From classical sternotomy to truly endoscopic mitral valve surgery: a step by step procedure. , 2003, Heart, lung & circulation.

[7]  D. Glower,et al.  Mitral valve operation via Port Access versus median sternotomy. , 1998, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[8]  B. A. Jones,et al.  Robotic mitral valve repair: a community hospital experience. , 2005, Texas Heart Institute journal.

[9]  Mark S Slaughter,et al.  Minimally invasive mitral valve repair using the da Vinci robotic system. , 2004, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[10]  T. Aybek,et al.  Minimally invasive port access versus conventional mitral valve surgery: prospective randomized study. , 2005, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[11]  P. Skillington,et al.  Robotic cardiac surgery at Epworth hospital. , 2004, Heart, lung & circulation.

[12]  M. Marohn,et al.  A consensus document on robotic surgery , 2008, Surgical Endoscopy.

[13]  Y. Woo,et al.  Robotic minimally invasive mitral valve reconstruction yields less blood product transfusion and shorter length of stay. , 2006, Surgery.

[14]  Totally Robotic Mitral Valve Repair , 2007 .

[15]  P. Vos,et al.  Robotic mitral valve repairs in 300 patients: a single-center experience. , 2008, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[16]  D. Murphy,et al.  Endoscopic robotic mitral valve surgery. , 2006, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[17]  Evelio Rodriguez,et al.  Minimally invasive, robotic, and off-pump mitral valve surgery. , 2006, Seminars in thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[18]  A. Carpentier,et al.  [Open heart operation under videosurgery and minithoracotomy. First case (mitral valvuloplasty) operated with success]. , 1996, Comptes rendus de l'Academie des sciences. Serie III, Sciences de la vie.

[19]  A. Kypson,et al.  Robotic mitral surgery: current and future roles , 2008, Current opinion in cardiology.

[20]  D. Cosgrove,et al.  Minimally invasive mitral valve operations. , 1996, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[21]  Mehmet C. Oz,et al.  Does Robotic Technology Make Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery Too Expensive? A Hospital Cost Analysis of Robotic and Conventional Techniques , 2005 .

[22]  F. Laborde,et al.  Mitral valve repair robotic versus sternotomy. , 2006, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[23]  A. Berrebi,et al.  Less invasive techniques for mitral valve surgery. , 1998, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[24]  T Walther,et al.  Pain and quality of life after minimally invasive versus conventional cardiac surgery. , 1999, The Annals of thoracic surgery.