A Helping Hand for Europe: The Competitive Outlook for the EU Robotics Industry

This report is one of a series resulting from a project entitled "Competitiveness by Leveraging Emerging Technologies Economically" (COMPLETE), carried out by JRC-IPTS. Each of the COMPLETE studies illustrates in its own right that European companies are active on many fronts of emerging and disruptive ICT technologies and are supplying the market with relevant products and services. Nevertheless, the studies also show that the creation and growth of high tech companies is still very complex and difficult in Europe, and too many economic opportunities seem to escape European initiatives and ownership. COMPLETE helps to illustrate some of the difficulties experienced in different segments of the ICT industry and by growing potential global players. Hopefully, COMPLETE will contribute to a better understanding of the opportunities and help shape better market conditions (financial, labour and product markets) to sustain European competitiveness and economic growth. This report deals with robotics applications in general, and in two specific areas selected because of potential market and EU capability in these areas: robotics applications in SMEs, and robotics safety. It starts by introducing the state of the art in robotics, their applications, market size, value chains and disruptive potential of emerging robotics technologies. For each of the two specific areas, the report describes the EU landscape, potential market, benefits, difficulties, and how these might be overcome. The last chapter draws together the findings of the study, to consider EU competitiveness in robotics, opportunities and policy implications. The work is based on desk research and targeted interviews with industry experts in Europe and beyond. The results were reviewed by experts and in a dedicated workshop.

[1]  Y. F. Yong,et al.  Robot Safety , 1985 .

[2]  Robin R. Murphy,et al.  Introduction to AI Robotics , 2000 .

[3]  Martin Hägele,et al.  Dependable Interaction with an Intelligent Home Care Robot , 2001 .

[4]  J. Lanier.  Virtually there. , 2001, Scientific American.

[5]  Mel Siegel,et al.  Sensor fusion for context understanding , 2002, IMTC/2002. Proceedings of the 19th IEEE Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference (IEEE Cat. No.00CH37276).

[6]  Hugh M. Herr,et al.  Cyborg Technology—Biomimetic Orthotic and Prosthetic Technology , 2003 .

[7]  Aristides A. G. Requicha.  Nanorobots, NEMS, and nanoassembly , 2003 .

[8]  Howard Pack,et al.  Industrial policy in an era of globalization : lessons from Asia , 2003 .

[9]  Antonio Bicchi,et al.  Optimal Mechanical/Control Design for Safe and Fast Robotics , 2004, ISER.

[10]  Dannelle P. Sierra,et al.  A review of research in the field of nanorobotics. , 2005 .

[11]  G. Giralt,et al.  Safe and dependable physical human-robot interaction in anthropic domains: State of the art and challenges , 2006, 2006 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[12]  Rolf Dieter Schraft,et al.  Robot-Dummy Crash Tests for Robot Safety Assessment , 2007, Proceedings 2007 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[13]  Alin Albu-Schäffer,et al.  The “DLR Crash Report”: Towards a standard crash-testing protocol for robot safety - Part I: Results , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[14]  Alin Albu-Schäffer,et al.  The “DLR crash report”: Towards a standard crash-testing protocol for robot safety - Part II: Discussions , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[15]  Jin Young Kim,et al.  Pipelines Monitoring System Using Bio-mimetic Robots , 2009 .

[16]  Jae-Bok Song,et al.  Safe robot arm with safe joint mechanism using nonlinear spring system for collision safety , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.