This study argues that society's choices between possible technological developments
are highly reflective of patterns of political, social, and economic power. Employing
insights from recent historical and sociological work on class, gender, consumption
and technology the processes by which social relations shaped the design, marketing
and uses of the car are explained. In turn, it is argued that the legal and physical
infrastructure which developed in the car's wake were extremely expressive of class
and gender relations.
The interwar years are studied because it was during this period, when the car
as a technology was still open to contestation, that the British car culture was defined.
This was so because it was during the 1920s and 1930s that car ownership became
a reality for millions of middle-class Britons. An analysis of the symbolic, as well
as the utilitarian, benefits of ownership is offered and reveals the car's role in the
expression of social and gender identity. The extent to which these factors impinged
upon the actions of car manufacturers and motor dealers is also related. This
perspective and the use of oral evidence has unearthed significant new evidence about
the composition of the motoring community.
The process through which influential sections of opinion reached a
concordance with the car is explained. As it became increasingly useful for them, the
professional and commercial middle-classes swung against significant restrictions on
car use. Pre-1914 they were often outraged by the danger and inconvenience that
were inevitable side effects of rising car ownership. However, once owners
themselves they were increasingly attracted to new ideas about road safety which
placed more and more emphasis on the education and segregation of other road users.
The influential pro-motoring lobby manipulated these developments, a factor which
is investigated here for the first time.
[1]
Cynthia Golomb Dettelbach.
IN THE DRIVER'S SEAT: A STUDY OF THE AUTOMOBILE IN AMERICAN LITERATURE AND POPULAR CULTURE.
,
1974
.
[2]
Andrew Davies.
The Police and the People: Gambling in Salford, 1900–1939
,
1991,
Historical-Philological Journal.
[3]
Clive Emsley,et al.
‘Mother, what did policemen do when there weren't any motors?’ The law, the police and the regulation of motor traffic in England, 1900–1939
,
1993,
The Historical Journal.
[4]
P. Burke.
Distinction: a social critique of the judgement of taste
,
1989
.
[5]
T. Corley.
Consumer Marketing in Britain 1914–60
,
1987
.
[6]
N. Garnham,et al.
Pierre Bourdieu and the sociology of culture: an introduction
,
1980
.
[7]
A. Jackson.
The middle classes, 1900-1950
,
1991
.
[8]
C. Joad.
The untutored townsman's invasion of the country
,
1946
.
[9]
Martha L. Olney.
Credit as a Production-Smoothing Device: The Case of Automobiles, 1913–1938
,
1989,
The Journal of Economic History.
[10]
O. Westall.
The Invisible Hand Strikes Back: Motor Insurance and the Erosion of Organised Competition in General Insurance, 1920–38
,
1988
.
[11]
Mary Cadogan.
Women with wings : female flyers in fact and fiction
,
1992
.
[12]
T C Barker.
Slow Progress: Forty Years of Motoring Research
,
1993
.
[13]
V. Gatrell,et al.
Crime, authority and the policeman-state
,
1990
.
[14]
Alan Armstrong.
Farmworkers: A Social and Economic History 1770-1980
,
1988
.
[15]
Gerald Silk,et al.
Automobile and Culture
,
1984
.
[16]
W. Jackson,et al.
City of Manchester plan
,
1945
.