Assessment of elbow joint kinematics in passive motion by electromagnetic motion tracking

This research provides a detailed analysis of the kinematics of passive elbow motion. It quantifies how closely humeroulnar kinematics approximates rotation around a fixed axis. The results are clinically relevant for emerging treatment modalities that impose an artificial hinge to the elbow joint, such as total elbow arthroplasty and articulated external fixation. In a cadaveric study of seven specimens, we quantified ulnar rotation around the humerus in terms of instantaneous screw displacement axes calculated from electromagnetic motion‐tracking source data. This methodology enabled description of the complex excursion of the elbow axis in terms of translation and orientation changes of the screw displacement axes over the range of motion. Furthermore, we analyzed the envelope of joint laxity for elbow motion under applied small varus and valgus moments. In addition, radiographic landmarks of clinical utility for axis location were evaluated by visualizing the elbow's radiographic appearance when viewed from along the calculated best‐fit (average) rotation axis. Over the normal range of elbow motion, the screw displacement axis varied 2.6–5.7° in orientation and 1.4–2.0 mm in translation. All instantaneous rotation axes nearly intersected on the medial facet of the trochlea. The breadth of the envelope of varus‐valgus joint laxity was greatest within the initial 40° of flexion and decreased by a factor of approximately two for flexion angles exceeding 100°.

[1]  H. R. Lissner,et al.  Biomechanics Of Human Motion , 1962 .

[2]  E. Chao,et al.  Passive motion of the elbow joint. , 1976, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[3]  J. London Kinematics of the elbow. , 1981, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[4]  R. L. Linscheid,et al.  Muscles across the elbow joint: a biomechanical analysis. , 1981, Journal of biomechanics.

[5]  Peter S. Walker,et al.  Biomechanical basis for elbow hinge-distractor design. , 1987 .

[6]  K N An,et al.  Application of a magnetic tracking device to kinesiologic studies. , 1988, Journal of biomechanics.

[7]  K. An,et al.  Kinematics of semi-constrained total elbow arthroplasty. , 1992, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[8]  Distraction arthrosplasty : clinical applications : Newest knowledge of external skeletal fixation devices , 1993 .

[9]  K. An,et al.  Kinematic and stability of the Norway elbow. A cadaveric study. , 1993, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[10]  K. An,et al.  Biomechanics of the elbow and forearm. , 1994, Hand clinics.

[11]  S. Delp,et al.  Variation of muscle moment arms with elbow and forearm position. , 1995, Journal of biomechanics.

[12]  James A. Johnson,et al.  Accuracy of an electromagnetic tracking device: a study of the optimal range and metal interference. , 1996, Journal of biomechanics.

[13]  T D Brown,et al.  Factors influencing accuracy of screw displacement axis detection with a D.C.-based electromagnetic tracking system. , 1998, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[14]  Kinematics and Laxity of Ulnohumeral Joint Under Valgus-Varus Stress , 1998 .

[15]  HINGED EXTERNAL ELBOW FIXATION : OPTIMAL AXIS ALIGNMENT TO MINIMIZE MOTION RESISTANCE , 1999 .