An Optimization Method of Marker Arrangement for Augmented Reality

Improving tracking accuracy is one of the most important issues for applying augmented reality to nuclear power plant field work. When employing tracking method using single camera and markers, tracking accuracy depends highly on marker arrangement. Manual design of marker arrangement is difficult to find a marker arrangement with high tracking accuracy. Therefore this study is subject to develop a marker arrangement optimization system based on genetic algorithm. Tracking error computation is necessary for each marker arrangement in marker arrangement optimization. Present tracking error computation method are all probabilistic and therefore feasible to nuclear power plant A wheel tracking error computation algorithm is developed. A marker arrangement optimization algorithm is realized by combining genetic algorithm with the wheel tracking error computation algorithm. Trial results show that tracking accuracy can be improved significantly by applying the advices provided by the marker arrangement optimization system.

[1]  Janne Heikkilä,et al.  A four-step camera calibration procedure with implicit image correction , 1997, Proceedings of IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[2]  Songde Ma,et al.  Implicit and Explicit Camera Calibration: Theory and Experiments , 1994, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[3]  David E. Goldberg,et al.  Genetic Algorithms in Search Optimization and Machine Learning , 1988 .

[4]  Long Quan,et al.  Linear N-Point Camera Pose Determination , 1999, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[5]  Roger Y. Tsai,et al.  A versatile camera calibration technique for high-accuracy 3D machine vision metrology using off-the-shelf TV cameras and lenses , 1987, IEEE J. Robotics Autom..

[6]  Hidekazu Yoshikawa,et al.  Development of a tracking method for augmented reality applied to NPP maintenance work and its experimental evaluation , 2006, VRST '06.

[7]  Ronald Azuma,et al.  Recent Advances in Augmented Reality , 2001, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[8]  Peter Meer,et al.  A general method for Errors-in-Variables problems in computer vision , 2000, Proceedings IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. CVPR 2000 (Cat. No.PR00662).

[9]  Tyrone L. Vincent,et al.  Analysis of Head Pose Accuracy in Augmented Reality , 2000, IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph..

[10]  Robert M. Haralick,et al.  Review and analysis of solutions of the three point perspective pose estimation problem , 1994, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[11]  Zhengyou Zhang,et al.  A Flexible New Technique for Camera Calibration , 2000, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..