Experiencing narrative worlds: A latent state–trait analysis

Abstract Transportation describes the degree to which individuals get absorbed in the fictional world of a story. Although conceived as a psychological state evoked by the processed narrative, it has also been associated with trait-like characteristics. An experimentally enhanced latent state–trait (LST) model was used to assess the degree to which transportation reflects (a) stable individual differences, and (b) systematic situational effects and/or person–situation interactions. After reading each of four stories 149 undergraduates rated their degree of being transported into the respective narratives. The contents of the stories were experimentally varied to (a) either facilitate or hinder transportation, and (b) present strong or weak arguments for the idea put forward in the stories. The LST analyses and experimental manipulations concordantly revealed that transportation captures pronounced situational effects related to the presented stories and to some degree also interindividual differences. In line with transportation theory, argument strength had no effect on the state component of transportation.

[1]  M. Crawley.  Mixed‐Effects Models , 2007 .

[2]  Michael Eid,et al.  Latent state–trait theory and research in personality and individual differences , 1999 .

[3]  Markus Appel,et al.  Stories can influence the self-concept , 2014 .

[4]  M. Slater,et al.  Entertainment—Education and Elaboration Likelihood: Understanding the Processing of Narrative Persuasion , 2002 .

[5]  T. Brock,et al.  Journal of Personality and Social Psychology the Role of Transportation in the Persuasiveness of Public Narratives Text Quality Individual Differences and Situational Influences Transportation Scale Items Gender Differences Discriminant Validation: Need for Cognition Effect of Text Manipulation Beli , 2022 .

[6]  Ginger Lockhart,et al.  A comparison of four approaches to account for method effects in latent state-trait analyses. , 2012, Psychological methods.

[7]  W. Klein,et al.  Handbook of Imagination and Mental Simulation , 2008 .

[8]  Markus Appel,et al.  The Influence of Paratext on Narrative Persuasion: Fact, Fiction, or Fake? , 2012 .

[9]  Chingching Chang,et al.  "Being Hooked" By Editorial Content: The Implications for Processing Narrative Advertising , 2009 .

[10]  Bartholomäus Wissmath,et al.  Immersion in Mediated Environments: The Role of Personality Traits , 2009, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[11]  J. Bruner.  The Narrative Construction of Reality , 1991, Critical Inquiry.

[12]  Jennifer Edson Escalas.  IMAGINE YOURSELF IN THE PRODUCT : Mental Simulation, Narrative Transportation, and Persuasion , 2004 .

[13]  Sharda Umanath,et al.  Using Fictional Sources in the Classroom: Applications from Cognitive Psychology , 2012 .

[14]  Markus Appel,et al.  Transportation and Need for Affect in Narrative Persuasion: A Mediated Moderation Model , 2010 .

[15]  Nai-Hwa Lien,et al.  Narrative ads: The effect of argument strength and story format , 2013 .

[16]  Helena Bilandzic,et al.  Transportation and Transportability in the Cultivation of Genre-Consistent Attitudes and Estimates , 2008 .

[17]  Jing Wang,et al.  Media Transportation and Advertising , 2006 .

[18]  Markus Appel,et al.  The Transportation Scale–Short Form (TS–SF) , 2015 .

[19]  Emily Dickinson,et al.  Letters of Emily Dickinson , 1958 .

[20]  M. Ziegler,et al.  Latent state-trait theory: an application in sport psychology. , 2009 .

[21]  Emanuele Castano,et al.  Reading Literary Fiction Improves Theory of Mind , 2013, Science.

[22]  Melanie C. Green,et al.  Transportation into narrative worlds: Implications for the self , 2005 .

[23]  David S. Miall.  Experiencing narrative worlds: On the psychological activities of reading , 2000 .

[24]  Boris Egloff,et al.  A Latent State-Trait Analysis of Implicit and Explicit Personality Measures , 2005 .

[25]  Markus Appel,et al.  The Persuasive Influence of a Fictional Character's Trustworthiness , 2013 .

[26]  Everett M. Rogers,et al.  A Theoretical Agenda for Entertainment—Education , 2002 .

[27]  Melanie C. Green,et al.  In the Mind's Eye Transportation-Imagery Model of Narrative Persuasion , 2002 .

[28]  Sandra Praxmarer.  Message strength and persuasion when consumers imagine product usage , 2011 .

[29]  Melanie C. Green,et al.  This Story Is Not for Everyone: Transportability and Narrative Persuasion , 2010 .

[30]  Ko de Ruyter,et al.  The Extended Transportation-Imagery Model: A Meta-Analysis of the Antecedents and Consequences of Consumers' Narrative Transportation , 2014 .

[31]  D. Bates,et al.  Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-PLUS , 2001 .

[32]  Markus Appel,et al.  A Short Measure of the Need for Affect , 2012, Journal of personality assessment.