Sensitivity of top-down CO source estimates to the modeled vertical structure in atmospheric CO

Abstract. We assessed the sensitivity of regional CO source estimates to the modeled vertical CO distribution by assimilating multi-spectral MOPITT (Measurements of Pollution In The Troposphere) V5J CO retrievals with the GEOS-Chem model. We compared the source estimates obtained by assimilating the CO profiles and the surface layer retrievals from June 2004 to May 2005. Because the surface layer retrievals are less sensitive to CO in the free troposphere, it is expected that they should provide constraints in the CO source estimates that are less sensitive to the vertical structure of CO in the free troposphere. The inferred source estimates all suggest a reduction in CO emissions in the tropics and subtropics, and an increase in the extratropics over the a priori estimates. The tropical decreases were particularly pronounced for regions where the biogenic source of CO was dominant, suggesting an overestimate of the a priori isoprene source of CO in the model. We found that the differences between the regional source estimates inferred from the profile and surface layer retrievals for 2004–2005 were small, generally less than 10% for the main continental regions, except for estimates for southern Asia, North America, and Europe. Because of discrepancies in convective transport in the model, the CO source estimates for India and southeastern Asia inferred from the CO profiles were significantly higher than those estimated from the surface layer retrievals during June–August 2004. On the other hand, the profile inversion underestimated the CO emissions from North America and Europe compared to the assimilation of the surface layer retrievals. We showed that vertical transport of air from the North American and European boundary layers is slower than from other continental regions, and thus air in the free troposphere from North America and Europe in the model is more chemically aged, which could explain the discrepancy between the source estimates inferred from the profile and surface layer retrievals. We also examined the impact of the OH distribution on the source estimates and found that the discrepancies between the source estimates obtained with two OH fields were larger when using the profile data, which is consistent with greater sensitivity to the more chemically aged air in the free troposphere. Our findings indicate that regional CO source estimates are sensitive to the vertical CO structure. They suggest that diagnostics to assess the age of air from the continental source regions should help interpret the results from CO source inversions. Our results also suggest that assimilating a broader range of composition measurements to provide better constraint on tropospheric OH and the biogenic sources of CO is essential for reliable quantification of the regional CO budget.

[1]  P. Palmer,et al.  Estimates of global terrestrial isoprene emissions using MEGAN (Model of Emissions of Gases and Aerosols from Nature) , 2006 .

[2]  Dylan B. A. Jones,et al.  Quantifying the impact of model errors on top‐down estimates of carbon monoxide emissions using satellite observations , 2011 .

[3]  Dylan B. A. Jones,et al.  Construction of non-diagonal background error covariance matrices for global chemical data assimilation , 2010 .

[4]  M. Buchwitz,et al.  Global Estimates of CO Sources with High Resolution by Adjoint Inversion of Multiple Satellite Datasets (MOPITT, AIRS, SCIAMACHY, TES) , 2009 .

[5]  H. Worden,et al.  Observations of near-surface carbon monoxide from space using MOPITT multispectral retrievals , 2010 .

[6]  K. Bowman,et al.  The influence of boreal biomass burning emissions on the distribution of tropospheric ozone over North America and the North Atlantic during 2010 , 2011 .

[7]  Steven Pawson,et al.  Error correlation between CO2 and CO as constraint for CO2 flux inversions using satellite data , 2009 .

[8]  Seasonal cycle of emissions of CO inferred from MOPITT profiles of CO: Sensitivity to pyroconvection and profile retrieval assumptions , 2011 .

[9]  Merritt N. Deeter,et al.  Ten years of CO emissions as seen from Measurements of Pollution in the Troposphere (MOPITT) , 2011 .

[10]  Dylan B. A. Jones,et al.  The zonal structure of tropical O 3 and CO as observed by the Tropospheric Emission Spectrometer in November 2004 – Part 1: Inverse modeling of CO emissions , 2009 .

[11]  Dylan B. A. Jones,et al.  Inverting for emissions of carbon monoxide from Asia using aircraft observations over the western Pacific , 2003 .

[12]  Remo Guidieri.  Res , 1995, RES: Anthropology and Aesthetics.

[13]  J. Lamarque,et al.  Monthly CO surface sources inventory based on the 2000–2001 MOPITT satellite data , 2004 .

[14]  M. Saunois,et al.  The formaldehyde budget as seen by a global-scale multi-constraint and multi-species inversion system , 2012 .

[15]  Zhe Jiang,et al.  El Niño, the 2006 Indonesian peat fires, and the distribution of atmospheric methane , 2013 .

[16]  Richard G. Derwent,et al.  Multimodel simulations of carbon monoxide: Comparison with observations and projected near‐future changes , 2006 .

[17]  D. Jacob,et al.  Comparison of Adjoint and Analytical Bayesian Inversion Methods for Constraining Asian Sources of Carbon Monoxide Using Satellite (MOPITT) Measurements of CO Columns , 2009 .

[18]  Merritt N. Deeter,et al.  The MOPITT version 4 CO product: Algorithm enhancements, validation, and long‐term stability , 2010 .

[19]  A. Stohl,et al.  On the pathways and timescales of intercontinental air pollution transport , 2002 .

[20]  Merritt N. Deeter,et al.  Evaluation of MOPITT retrievals of lower‐tropospheric carbon monoxide over the United States , 2012 .

[21]  John H. Seinfeld,et al.  Inverse modeling and mapping US air quality influences of inorganic PM 2.5 precursor emissions using the adjoint of GEOS-Chem , 2008 .

[22]  David G. Streets,et al.  Using CO2:CO Correlations to Improve Inverse Analyses of Carbon Fluxes , 2006 .

[23]  J.G.J. Olivier,et al.  Global emission sources and sinks , 2001 .

[24]  H. Worden,et al.  Carbon monoxide distributions from the IASI/METOP mission: evaluation with other space-borne remote sensors , 2009 .

[25]  Christopher D. Barnet,et al.  A comparison of satellite tropospheric carbon monoxide measurements from AIRS and MOPITT during INTEX‐A , 2007 .

[26]  C. Clerbaux,et al.  On the wintertime low bias of Northern Hemisphere carbon monoxide found in global model simulations , 2014 .

[27]  Annmarie Eldering,et al.  Comparison of carbon monoxide measurements by TES and MOPITT: Influence of a priori data and instrument characteristics on nadir atmospheric species retrievals , 2007 .

[28]  Henk Eskes,et al.  Simultaneous assimilation of satellite NO 2 , O 3 , CO, and HNO 3 data for the analysis of tropospheric chemical composition and emissions , 2012 .

[29]  I. Aben,et al.  Comparing optimized CO emission estimates using MOPITT or NOAA surface network observations , 2012 .

[30]  J. Lamarque,et al.  Operational carbon monoxide retrieval algorithm and selected results for the MOPITT instrument , 2003 .

[31]  P. Hess,et al.  Sensitivity of top‐down estimates of CO sources to GCTM transport , 2005 .

[32]  H. Worden,et al.  MOPITT multispectral CO retrievals: Origins and effects of geophysical radiance errors , 2011 .

[33]  K. F. Boersma,et al.  Spatial distribution of isoprene emissions from North America derived from formaldehyde column measurements by the OMI satellite sensor , 2008 .

[34]  G. Carmichael,et al.  Asian emissions in 2006 for the NASA INTEX-B mission , 2009 .

[35]  Kevin W. Bowman,et al.  Estimating the summertime tropospheric ozone distribution over North America through assimilation of observations from the Tropospheric Emission Spectrometer , 2008 .

[36]  K. Chance,et al.  Constraining global isoprene emissions with Global Ozone Monitoring Experiment (GOME) formaldehyde column measurements , 2005 .

[37]  D. Jacob,et al.  Improved model of isoprene emissions in Africa using Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) satellite observations of formaldehyde: implications for oxidants and particulate matter , 2014 .

[38]  Dylan B. A. Jones,et al.  Regional data assimilation of multi-spectral MOPITT observations of CO over North America , 2015 .

[39]  J. Randerson,et al.  Global fire emissions and the contribution of deforestation, savanna, forest, agricultural, and peat fires (1997-2009) , 2010 .

[40]  Vigdis Vestreng,et al.  Emission data reported to UNECE/EMEP: Quality assurance and trend analysis & presentation of WebDab : MSC-W status report 2002 , 2002 .

[41]  J. Seinfeld,et al.  Development of the adjoint of GEOS-Chem , 2006 .

[42]  Dylan B. A. Jones,et al.  Impact of model errors in convective transport on CO source estimates inferred from MOPITT CO retrievals , 2013 .

[43]  Dorian S. Abbot,et al.  Seasonal and interannual variability of North American isoprene emissions as determined by formaldehyde column measurements from space , 2003 .

[44]  S. Wofsy,et al.  Validation of MOPITT Version 5 thermal‐infrared, near‐infrared, and multispectral carbon monoxide profile retrievals for 2000–2011 , 2013 .

[45]  J. Randerson,et al.  Time-dependent inversion estimates of global biomass-burning CO emissions using Measurement of Pollution in the Troposphere (MOPITT) measurements , 2006 .

[46]  A. Goldstein,et al.  Biogenic versus anthropogenic sources of CO in the United States , 2008 .

[47]  T. N. Krishnamurti,et al.  Global chemical model analysis of biomass burning and lightning influences over the South Pacific in austral spring , 2002 .

[48]  G. Stenchikov,et al.  Analysis of Convective Transport and Parameter Sensitivity in a Single Column Version of the Goddard Earth Observation System, Version 5, General Circulation Model , 2009 .

[49]  Dylan B. A. Jones,et al.  Analysis of CO in the tropical troposphere using Aura satellite data and the GEOS-Chem model: insights into transport characteristics of the GEOS meteorological products , 2010 .

[50]  John C. Gille,et al.  Comparative inverse analysis of satellite (MOPITT) and aircraft (TRACE-P) observations to estimate Asian sources of carbon monoxide , 2004 .

[51]  D. Jacob,et al.  Impact of new laboratory studies of N2O5 hydrolysis on global model budgets of tropospheric nitrogen oxides, ozone, and OH , 2005, Geophysical Research Letters.

[52]  R. Martin,et al.  Net ecosystem fluxes of isoprene over tropical South America inferred from Global Ozone Monitoring Experiment (GOME) observations of HCHO columns , 2008 .